BF2S Forums Marrage is pretty much a shame anyway

Bubbalo wrote:

Before I begin, I have to ask: what the hell are you on?

Bubbalo wrote:

1 Your point?  The fact that divorce is incredibly commonplace further reduces the 3 importance of the sanctity of marriage argument.

Bubbalo wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

So you're pretty much saying that it's a terrible, rotten thing...marriage. irt1 (see above)

Where did I say that?  I merely said that the idea that marriage should be limited to certain unions to protect it's sanctity because divorce is already so commonplace.

Well, why didn't you say so in the first place? I don't see how saying "the rate of divorce reduces the importance of the sanctity of marriage" is in any way similar to "marriage should be limited to certain unions to protect its sanctity because divorce is common."

Marriage is defined as a union between a man and a woman in a mated relationship. The 'sanctity of marriage' argument seeks to ensure that this definition remains unmolested, legally. The number of divorces are irrelevant to the counter-argument, as divorce is legal.

Bubbalo wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

and there are more important things to do in the world than to abolish marriage, no matter how horrible anyone thinks it is.

Who talking about abolishing marriage?

It's been discussed before. I don't know if you were involved, as I don't track your every move. If you'll notice, the word "anyone" does not equate with "bubbalo."

irt2 (see below) Funny that you should mock my communication skills.

Bubbalo wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

The idea that an increase in a particular activity reduces its importance is silly.  In an extreme scenario, if government buildings being bombed in your country suddenly became "incredibly commonplace," would you assign to them reduced importance? Just because minimart stick-ups are a commonplace activity doesn't mean I'd rush out to do it. If one of my friends jumped off of a bridge, I wouldn't follow them. And if I was married, I wouldn't rush headlong into a divorce just because other people are doing it.

Actually, when something happens more often the effect is reduced.  Look at countries where murder is commonplace, and compare the reaction of the populace to the reaction in a country where it rarely happens.  Seriously, this whole paragraph is outright wrong.  There's not any question about it, at all.

Effect is the keyword here. Your original term, I believe, was irt3 (see above) "importance."

Bubbalo wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Do I have to explain and iterate every one of my posts in utmost detail to you?

2 Actually, you do have to iterate every one of your posts.  Otherwise noone can read them.  I find it funny that you criticise my comprehension when you're the one who doesn't seem to have understood anything I've said.

I think that perceived "no one" is you. Oooh, look! I can bandy veiled insults too.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-06-11 05:19:35)

Cougar wrote:

I really don't see why this issue is a debate, gays SHOULD NOT be allowed to marry.  Period.

Why?

For one it is not natural.  Marriage is the human way of showing that we are homogeneous(sp?), or rather that we have the same partner throughout life that we bear children with.  Geese are another example except without the marriage part.  If a goose's partner dies it doesn't reproduce with another male or female for the rest of it's life.  Humans have created "marriage" is our way of showing this, even though the majority aren't very good at it.  Two fags cannot reproduce and therefore in a natural sense of the word, have no reason to be married.

Second, it's disgusting.  They stick their PENISES in each other's BUTTHOLE'S.  Not natural, not good, the state does not need to recognize that these two dudes toss each others salad.  It's gross.  Ever seen two dude's making out?  Made ya wanna vomit huh?  Imagine going to marriages and hearing the preacher say, "you may now kiss the groom's" followed by two homo's making out.  No thanks.

Third, they have sex with each other.  Not good.  That shouldn't be a religiously and federally sanctioned event.  Personally, I'm a bit confused on the whole homosexuality thing because I look at my ass in the mirror and in no way whatsoever does it look enticing or delicious.  If your the kinda guy that would choose a hairy, sweaty shit crusted ass over a well shaved and juicy vagina and a pair of tits........then there is something wrong with your brain.  Seriously.

Fourth, its disgusting.  I once experimented with anal sex with my girlfriend......I won't go into details but let's just say things got really gross really fast and it didn't smell to great either.  For all those wanting to try it...don't, it ain't all it's cracked up to be in porno's.  To simulate, take a fresh dump in the toilet and then get on your knees and stick your face in the bowl and start masturbating, not that great.  These people do it willingly and they ENJOY it.  What's worse is they do it with other guys.  WTF!?

Fifth, lesbians.  99.999999% of lesbians are women who couldn't get a decent guy if they tried and they wear alot of plaid and have stupid flattop haircuts.  This is not what growing up with Hustler taught me, but it's true.  It's almost as disgusting as guy fags but not quite.  I don't know how many of you have smelled vagina after a day in denim, but it ain't pleasant.  All lesbians wear is denim, so use your imagination.

Sixth.  Why in the fuck would anyone want to be gay?  Because they are fucking idiots, or at least thats the only reason I can come up with.  Rebellious perhaps?  I don't know but I feel sorry for the kids that have to grow up with two daddies or two mommies, how weird is that at high school graduation or at a Parent Teacher Conference?  Forget friends, that kid is branded for life and will probably end up gay himself/herself.

Lets recap:

1. Not natural
2. Disgusting
3. Not good.
4. Disgusting.
5. Weird
6. Bad future for children.

I rest my case.

Bigwrm wrote:

1.  You are a retard
2.  You are a retard
3.  Your ignorance is not good.
4.  Your ignorance is disgusting
5.  Your attitude is "weird" to me
6.  Your attitude is bad for the the children


  Whata poor case you rest.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-06-11 15:24:52)

Cougar wrote:

You know what, FUCK all of you assfags.  If your the kind of person that would stick up for two men fucking each other in the ass then you are definitly not the kind of people I want to be around, much less have a conversation with.  MEN ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO FUCK EACH OTHER IN THE ASS.  Stare at that sentence for a while.  You show me a legitimate reason why two DUDES need to fuck each other in the ass, then I will agree with you whole-heartedly.  I really don't see how anyone could disagree on the fact that homosexuals have something worng with their goddamned brain. 

And whoever called me a Bible thumping fucktard, is a motherfucking dumbass.  Grow some fucking balls and leave a name you twat.

Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-11 22:56:48)

Cougar wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

Cougar wrote:

You know what, FUCK all of you assfags.  If your the kind of person that would stick up for two men fucking each other in the ass then you are definitly not the kind of people I want to be around, much less have a conversation with.  MEN ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO FUCK EACH OTHER IN THE ASS.  Stare at that sentence for a while.  You show me a legitimate reason why two DUDES need to fuck each other in the ass, then I will agree with you whole-heartedly.  I really don't see how anyone could disagree on the fact that homosexuals have something wrong with their goddamned brain. 

And whoever called me a Bible thumping fucktard, is a motherfucking dumbass.  Grow some fucking balls and leave a name you twat.

Dude, is this not resemblant of a needless hatred that is so shunned from the modern, ethical perspective? How could one possibly produce such a whacko fucking perspective? You present nothing other than fearful bias rooted in superficiality. Absolutely, god damn pathetic. Just because another human has developed varying preferences for satisfaction and enjoyment by no means constitutes that another defends these as there own, but merely that this defender respects their right to be what they are and to make the choices that they have. All in all, I can only say that you're indeed a pitiful heap of human.

Well by that logic, I'm entitled to my opinion of hating faggots just as you are entitled to your opinion of being one.  Developed varying preferences?  MEN WHO CRAM THEIR COCKS IN OTHER MENS ASSHOLES ARE NOT DISPLAYING A VARIED PREFERENCE, THEIR SICK!  I respect NOTHING in respect to homosexuality, IMHO they are scum, just like in your honest opinion I'm a worthless pile of flesh, but at least I'm not a worthless pile of flesh that goes to bed every night with Johnny Numbnuts laying next to me with a boner.

The fact that homosexuals are accepted in modern society is proof of our declining morality and desensitivity to things that are just not right.  The fact that people like you defend them, I find to be frankly disturbing.

(P.S. Unlike Xietsu, I'm man enough to leave my fucking name after I neg someone, instead of hiding like a bitch in anonymity.)

Xietsu wrote:

Cougar wrote:

Xietsu wrote:

Dude, is this not resemblant of a needless hatred that is so shunned from the modern, ethical perspective? How could one possibly produce such a whacko fucking perspective? You present nothing other than fearful bias rooted in superficiality. Absolutely, god damn pathetic. Just because another human has developed varying preferences for satisfaction and enjoyment by no means constitutes that another defends these as there own, but merely that this defender respects their right to be what they are and to make the choices that they have. All in all, I can only say that you're indeed a pitiful heap of human.

Well by that logic, I'm entitled to my opinion of hating faggots just as you are entitled to your opinion of being one.  Developed varying preferences?  MEN WHO CRAM THEIR COCKS IN OTHER MENS ASSHOLES ARE NOT DISPLAYING A VARIED PREFERENCE, THEIR SICK!  I respect NOTHING in respect to homosexuality, IMHO they are scum, just like in your honest opinion I'm a worthless pile of flesh, but at least I'm not a worthless pile of flesh that goes to bed every night with Johnny Numbnuts laying next to me with a boner.

The fact that homosexuals are accepted in modern society is proof of our declining morality and desensitivity to things that are just not right.  The fact that people like you defend them, I find to be frankly disturbing.

(P.S. Unlike Xietsu, I'm man enough to leave my fucking name after I neg someone, instead of hiding like a bitch in anonymity.)

Every descriptor attributed to you in my previous post, is, in all aspects of this discussion, wholly correct. Your rendition of "that logic" is, by far, an extreme misinterpretation/misrepresentation of the fact. The point is that I respect anothers preferences/choices in life, and you merely concoct pathetic, irrelevant jibe supportive to your feaful bias of superficial degree. I find it so very odd that your main focus is "fucking in the ass" when man and woman do the same thing (you know, stool packing). You're seriously fucking sad. And to assume I've left you karma anonymously, how fucking juvenile. Grow the fuck up. More evidence to your petty superficiality. Honest, if you want, I'll leave you a negative karma right now. Just let me know you want some negative .

Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-11 23:34:22)

Xietsu wrote:

I labeled you that? Please, let me know, I'd like to see the evidence you have for something that I haven't done. As I said, if you want me to negative karma you, I will do so with a signature, as to dissuade your delusions (funny that I even need propose this, you're such a fucking tool to your misconceptions [and superficiality...gotta' love...that pitiful fuckin' superficiality]).

If English comprehension truly escapes you to such a degree and I actually require repetition, then you are sincerely trivial and without value.

Serious-fucking-ly, if I need reiterate what I have said, you're not deservant of the effort.

Xietsu wrote:

You fucks tonight...geesh. Cougar, you're just full of bullshit. All you do is spew and spew, all the while remaining an ignorant little fuck. I can just imagine the type of job you held in the military...

Xietsu wrote:

I can just imagine the type of job you held in the military...

Cougar wrote:

Their called NCO's fuckwad.

SiMSaM16 wrote:

Marriage is a sacred thing between a man and women (no homos).

Last edited by Bubbalo (2006-06-12 00:18:06)