aipotwckma
Member
+5|6895
The two major religions[Catholicism/Christianity & Islam] in the world at least have a sense of humanity and a sense of unity. Athiesm and Secularism feel no shame in promoting inhuman beliefs, e.g. homosexuality for one. I am not going to bash and say that everyone will go to hell if they are an athiest. I am only stating that if everyone in the world were athiest, the human race would be peaceful, yet incredibly immoral. Think of it balancing out. When there are two religions, their people would probably not like the other, starting wars or some sort of hatred.[The Crusades, for example] However, the two religions beliefs promote a sense of morality compared to athiesm. On the other side, if everyone were athiest, there would be no religious beliefs of any kind, therefore creating a very small sense of unity[if not, none at all] and morality of anyones choosing.[Which can be bad, in many cases..] However, athiesm may create a sense of peace, excluding politics.

This is just my view. Discuss if you like.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6872|949

First off, atheists/secularists do not promote homosexuality.  Most just come to the rational conclusion that homosexuality is a human condition, not a choice.  When did you decide to become heterosexual?  Second, why do you say atheists/secularists have no morality?  I consider myself more moral than many of the prominent Christians out there.  Third, many other factors beside religion unite people.
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|6899|BC, Canada
wow.... were you on some bad acid when you came up with this? or and someone just hit you really hard in the head... with a sledge hammer?
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|7014|Noizyland

Couldn't agree more Ken.
Whos morals are we talking about by the way? Yours? Mine? Societies? Morals have nothing to do with religeon. Morals are taught in the Bible and the Koran etc. but religeon is not responsible for them. Do you think that because I'm an athiest I think that murder is right or moral? No, it's fucking immoral and I didn't need a Bible to tell me that!
I think it is immoral when someone can't accept who someone else is. I have homosexual friends and they are great people. I don't think they are immoral and I don't think they chose the way the are just like I think you can't choose your own eye colour.

Your description of an Athiest world with no unity - that's not Athieism, that is Anarchism. Completely different. Honestly do you really think people are only united because of religeous beliefs? Do you have friends who arn't the same religeon as you? If so, that completely discredits your theory doesn't it? If not I think you should get out a bit more.

Interesting opinion though, I always enjoy a good debate.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
UON
Junglist Massive
+223|6893

aipotwckma wrote:

I am only stating that if everyone in the world were athiest, the human race would be peaceful, yet incredibly immoral.
I doubt humanity is capable of being peaceful, and you forget that the real reason behind most wars is money... religion just gives the excuse. And certain standards of morality are governed by rule of law where I live in the UK, so why would that be any different if there weren't any god-botherers?  And aren't an abnormally high percentage of vicars gay child molesters?

aipotwckma wrote:

if everyone were athiest, there would be no religious beliefs of any kind, therefore creating a very small sense of unity[if not, none at all]
I would strongly disagree with that statement.  Maybe you mean nihilists who believe in nothing, including strong community and equal opportunity which is a uniting factor amongst many athiests.
[THE] comben
Wee and Biscuits
+43|6773|Cardiff
unless im much mistaken, religion has caused more death and suffering through out recorded history than any other factor....

i am an athiest, im too bitter and disgusted with teh world to beleive that theres a 'higher being' who actually made this shit up lol.  what a waste of time that would have been lol.

anyhoo despite not being into religion (whilst respecting the principles of peeps who do beleive and the fact that pretty much all religions teach u to show compasion and respect) i prolly got more respect for my fellow man than someone who bothers to write this...

'I am only stating that if everyone in the world were athiest, the human race would be peaceful, yet incredibly immoral'

... on a forum for a war game!

also if there was no religion the world would prolly be exactly the same as it is.  we'd just substitute a word for religion and kill each other some more.
j5f5ff
Member
+11|6990
One could also argue that an athiest would be more respectful of others because without the promise of forgivness and an afterlife, life becomes more valuable.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6872|949

j5f5ff wrote:

One could also argue that an athiest would be more respectful of others because without the promise of forgivness and an afterlife, life becomes more valuable.
Reincarnation/afterlife and religion are not the same thing.  Most (if not all) religions believe in some sort of afterlife, but one can believe in reincarnation but not a higher power.
Marconius
One-eyed Wonder Mod
+368|6934|San Francisco
Alright... *cracks knuckles*

1.  Atheism promotes NOTHING.  It in itself is a philosophic belief that there is no higher power/god.  That is it.  There is no dogma, there are no rituals, etc.  Believing that it is promoting something other than this to support your case is futile.  Atheism does not tell people how to live their lives, therefore does not promote homosexuality, degrade human unity, or anything that you personally feel is perverse.

2.  As was said before, Atheism does Not equal Anarchism.  Lack of morality leads to Anarchism; believing that there is no higher power doesn't constrain you from recognizing what is generally regarded as Right and Wrong.  You don't need your Rights and Wrongs dictated to you, you just learn through social experiment and adaptation.  It's called Reason.

3.  Human unity falls under several categories and cannot be lumped up into religion alone.  A lack of religion would allow humans to unify under the very idea that they are indeed Human.  Western Religion seems to inspire more division than unity, with constant violence being carried out in any of "god's" many names.  Or just look at how sectarian they have all become as more and more followers branch off with their own forms of Reason mixed with their teachings.  Christianity alone as over 700 separate sects, each believing in something different.  Religion is almost turning into a xeno-divide; lack of it would allow humans to unify much easier, without fear of being persecuted or sparking millenia of wars and hatred due to group differences in philosophical opinion.

It is possible to be Good without god, you just need to back away from the religions that slander that form of thinking in order to keep people under their control.  Freethought will unite people, reason will be the oil in the gears of society.
j5f5ff
Member
+11|6990

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

j5f5ff wrote:

One could also argue that an athiest would be more respectful of others because without the promise of forgivness and an afterlife, life becomes more valuable.
Reincarnation/afterlife and religion are not the same thing.  Most (if not all) religions believe in some sort of afterlife, but one can believe in reincarnation but not a higher power.
agreed.  I slanted my response toward monothism simply because the original poster seemed so inclined.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|6976|Salt Lake City

Ken, Marconius, and rdx-fx have all said it very well, so I'm not going add any additional content other than to say I completely agree.
herrr_smity
Member
+156|6868|space command ur anus
Atheists don't promote homosexuality or anything else, and why are homosexuality inhuman i will go so far as to say that as long as there have been humans on the planet there have been homosexuals.
even other animals can be gay
JaMDuDe
Member
+69|7017
We all know whats right and wrong. Even without the bible/koran telling us. Morality is innate.
Xietsu
Banned
+50|6796
OHMUHGAWz JAMDOOD UNDURSTAAANDZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But anyways, let me provide a teensy bit of education. Morality, as we know it (exclusive to the individual "rights" of man), is not intrinsic in nature. Ethics is stemmed through environment, exposure, and etc.

Oh yeah...I was gonna' sae...
The construction of these religious scriptures had, most likely, been in an effort to unify and explain common emotion (joo' knoh, dat weetle feeling yoo get inside when you do something spooshel). Considering that modern society has evolved to such a degree, no longer are such binding forces needed (well, if you're in America--couldn't say the same for some other places, yuh knoh).

Last edited by Xietsu (2006-06-08 17:55:46)

Marconius
One-eyed Wonder Mod
+368|6934|San Francisco
Holy crap!  Jamdude is learning!  Someone knife me, I must be dreaming...
Xietsu
Banned
+50|6796
Gawlf Klap Tiiiime!!
JaMDuDe
Member
+69|7017
Yeah but its God given moral law, not accidental mutation/natural selection/environment given.

Last edited by JaMDuDe (2006-06-08 18:31:15)

Xietsu
Banned
+50|6796
Sorry, I retract my golf clap.
Marconius
One-eyed Wonder Mod
+368|6934|San Francisco
Dammit!  Oh well, back to the drawing board...
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6795

Marconius wrote:

Alright... *cracks knuckles*

1.  Atheism promotes NOTHING.  It in itself is a philosophic belief that there is no higher power/god.  That is it.  There is no dogma, there are no rituals, etc.  Believing that it is promoting something other than this to support your case is futile.  Atheism does not tell people how to live their lives, therefore does not promote homosexuality, degrade human unity, or anything that you personally feel is perverse.

2.  As was said before, Atheism does Not equal Anarchism.  Lack of morality leads to Anarchism; believing that there is no higher power doesn't constrain you from recognizing what is generally regarded as Right and Wrong.  You don't need your Rights and Wrongs dictated to you, you just learn through social experiment and adaptation.  It's called Reason.

3.  Human unity falls under several categories and cannot be lumped up into religion alone.  A lack of religion would allow humans to unify under the very idea that they are indeed Human.  Western Religion seems to inspire more division than unity, with constant violence being carried out in any of "god's" many names.  Or just look at how sectarian they have all become as more and more followers branch off with their own forms of Reason mixed with their teachings.  Christianity alone as over 700 separate sects, each believing in something different.  Religion is almost turning into a xeno-divide; lack of it would allow humans to unify much easier, without fear of being persecuted or sparking millenia of wars and hatred due to group differences in philosophical opinion.

It is possible to be Good without god, you just need to back away from the religions that slander that form of thinking in order to keep people under their control.  Freethought will unite people, reason will be the oil in the gears of society.
TrollmeaT
Aspiring Objectivist
+492|6912|Colorado
Catholicism & Christianity are 2 different religions, inhuman beliefs = homosexuality, I don't think so I know 2 girls that are & they are the most human people I have ever met.

Morality is like religion, it is defined by the person using it.

I'm a proud pagan & very peaceful & moral {according to me} , the most aggressive I get is when I play bf2 and slam the keyboard when I die or let out a huge "fuck!"

I would do your homework a little more before starting a discussion like this because you're obviously biased on some points & have no freaking idea what you are talking about to begin with.
ComradeWho
Member
+50|6935|Southern California

aipotwckma wrote:

The two major religions[Catholicism/Christianity & Islam] in the world at least have a sense of humanity and a sense of unity. Athiesm and Secularism feel no shame in promoting inhuman beliefs, e.g. homosexuality for one. I am not going to bash and say that everyone will go to hell if they are an athiest. I am only stating that if everyone in the world were athiest, the human race would be peaceful, yet incredibly immoral. Think of it balancing out. When there are two religions, their people would probably not like the other, starting wars or some sort of hatred.[The Crusades, for example] However, the two religions beliefs promote a sense of morality compared to athiesm. On the other side, if everyone were athiest, there would be no religious beliefs of any kind, therefore creating a very small sense of unity[if not, none at all] and morality of anyones choosing.[Which can be bad, in many cases..] However, athiesm may create a sense of peace, excluding politics.

This is just my view. Discuss if you like.
i think what you fail to realize is that most atheists have rejected religion specifically because the morality is simplistic, archaic, and basically for stupid people who don't want to think too much about right and wrong and need to make up some external authority for the world to make sense. atheists usually have complicated and well thought out moral codes that are far superior than anything found in a "magic book" that contains the laws of some "magical superhero."

the best philosophers are atheists.. you know.. the ones that helped to establish the morality that is essential to the development of the abrahamic religons. what is christianity withour aristotle? i bet you don't know!


on a side note homosexuality is conducted by humans, it is therefor a human act, and is therefor humane by definition. just like genocide. i really don't think it's inhumane to leave people alone who want to have sex with each other - sex is a good thing - christian's have created a lot of problems for the world by coming up with irrational sex rules. that's why it's so funny that you brought up the catholics.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6956
what about Buddhism? they i think is one of the most peaceful religions in the world, never think of war, just peace.

i agree w/ marconius
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6915|Canberra, AUS
I think the original poster has been successfully pwned over their complete and utter ignorance.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
BVC
Member
+325|6935

aipotwckma wrote:

The two major religions[Catholicism/Christianity & Islam] in the world at least have a sense of humanity and a sense of unity. Athiesm and Secularism feel no shame in promoting inhuman beliefs, e.g. homosexuality for one. I am not going to bash and say that everyone will go to hell if they are an athiest. I am only stating that if everyone in the world were athiest, the human race would be peaceful, yet incredibly immoral. Think of it balancing out. When there are two religions, their people would probably not like the other, starting wars or some sort of hatred.[The Crusades, for example] However, the two religions beliefs promote a sense of morality compared to athiesm. On the other side, if everyone were athiest, there would be no religious beliefs of any kind, therefore creating a very small sense of unity[if not, none at all] and morality of anyones choosing.[Which can be bad, in many cases..] However, athiesm may create a sense of peace, excluding politics.

This is just my view. Discuss if you like.
Athiests have morals, we just don't need a book, priest or mullah to tell us what they are.  Mine are based largely in practicality, and what I would be willing to tolerate upon myself and those I care about, they're actually quite a lot like the "ten commandments"; I believe murder is wrong, going after someone elses SO is a no-no etc...

That said, I don't believe theres anything wrong with homosexuality.  I'm heterosexual, but if my neighbour chooses to fuck another guy up the arse, or if my other neighbour falls in love with an other woman, whys it any of my business?  Its their right to choose what they do and with whom they do it, and any attempt to deny them that right is an attempt to deny them their freedom.

Consider this:  Lets assume for a minute that the christian god does exist.  He gave us all free will right?  Hes supposed to be the very embodiment of all that is good, right?  If thats the case, then isn't god's gift of free will a good thing?  And wouldn't any action that erodes itl be going against god's will?  Dare I say it, but outlawing the right to choose a same-sex partner, or the right to choose who you worship (or don't), wouldn't that be anti-christian?

I'm an athiest, I believe in many things, and one of them is free will.  In my view, anyone who attacks the free will of another is immoral by my standards, and I'm sure there are many people (christian, muslim and otherwise) out there who agree with me.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard