You won't be able to. Planes evaporate when they hit WALLS OF SOLID GRANITE at 500 MPH.
Yeah. It was completely vaporized. That's what happens to 100 tons of reinforced steel when it hits WALLS OF SOLID GRANITE at 500 MPH.
Planes do not vaporize. Anyone that has seen any plane wreck knows that.
I like when people don't understand sarcasm.
Not knowing the facts? Uh, ok. You're ignorant.
The Pentagon isn't your average building. Flying anything at it at a high rate of speed is the same thing as flying into the face of a mountain. The mountain is going to laugh at you and stay there ... and whatever was being flown at it would be ripped to small pieces.
Take a look at the pictures again. What do you see? Small pieces of airplane and the Pentagon largely still intact.
THEY FOUND THE FLIGHT RECORDER. THEY FOUND BODY PARTS OF PEOPLE THAT WERE ON THE AIRLINER. GET OVER THE CONSPIRACY THEORY.
The Pentagon isn't your average building. Flying anything at it at a high rate of speed is the same thing as flying into the face of a mountain. The mountain is going to laugh at you and stay there ... and whatever was being flown at it would be ripped to small pieces.
Take a look at the pictures again. What do you see? Small pieces of airplane and the Pentagon largely still intact.
THEY FOUND THE FLIGHT RECORDER. THEY FOUND BODY PARTS OF PEOPLE THAT WERE ON THE AIRLINER. GET OVER THE CONSPIRACY THEORY.
For the record I'm not saying this is a conspiracy thoery but it is interesting how it all seems a bit odd...
http://www.911inplanesite.com/
http://www.911inplanesite.com/
Standard operating procedure in a plane crash is to hit the big ass button usually on the cockpit wall that says "FUEL DUMP", this is so when the plane does stop moving, you're not hit by a wall of burning fuel in your wake, the terrorists chose these flights because they were long distance flights and would be loaded with as much fuel as possible. Jet fuels have one of the highest octane ratings around and CAN vaporize the lightweight alloys used in aircraft construction, many of the commercial ones being based on some form of aluminum. You can test this yourself simply by taking an aluminum beer can, drinking the beer, tossing it on a campfire, then promptly stumbling face first into the coals. Seriously though, some of you may work with torches and aluminum in body shops or even constucting your nerd cred case mods can do this.
Reinforced steel is too heavy to make a plane out of, anyone knows that.
Reinforced steel is too heavy to make a plane out of, anyone knows that.
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-06-03 09:12:09)
Good to be back.
it was no boeing that hit the pentagon because it would have atleast destroyed more then what has been destroyed at the pentagon, only the first wall was destroyed if it was a boeing it would have destroyed the 2e and 3e wall (office) whatever it is in there
Here's a couple more interesting bits:
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4 … t_slow.mov
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4crashtest.mov
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4 … t_slow.mpg
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4crashtest.mpg
So, do tell me, since you seem to be the professor of physics here. An F4 moving at 320 MPH vaporizes when hitting a reinforced concrete wall like that of a nuclear reactor's cooling tower. A 757 moving at 500+ MPH with a full load of gas hitting the reinforced walls of the Pentagon does not? I think you need to recheck there, Mr. Smartey.
(Edit: fixed link)
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4 … t_slow.mov
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4crashtest.mov
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4 … t_slow.mpg
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4crashtest.mpg
So, do tell me, since you seem to be the professor of physics here. An F4 moving at 320 MPH vaporizes when hitting a reinforced concrete wall like that of a nuclear reactor's cooling tower. A 757 moving at 500+ MPH with a full load of gas hitting the reinforced walls of the Pentagon does not? I think you need to recheck there, Mr. Smartey.
(Edit: fixed link)
Last edited by remo (2006-06-03 09:15:07)
Physics are mother natures way of telling libs to STFU!remo wrote:
Here's a couple more interesting bits:
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4 … t_slow.mov
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4crashtest.mov
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4 … t_slow.mpg
http://www.sandia.gov/media/mov_mpg/f_4crashtest.mpg
So, do tell me, since you seem to be the professor of physics here. An F4 moving at 320 MPH vaporizes when hitting a reinforced concrete wall like that of a nuclear reactor's cooling tower. A 757 moving at 500+ MPH with a full load of gas hitting the reinforced walls of the Pentagon does not? I think you need to recheck there, Mr. Smartey.
(Edit: fixed link)
Get rid of the r in your name and thats why i am not gonna listen to you... remo-r=emo.remo wrote:
Not knowing the facts? Uh, ok. You're ignorant.
The Pentagon isn't your average building. Flying anything at it at a high rate of speed is the same thing as flying into the face of a mountain. The mountain is going to laugh at you and stay there ... and whatever was being flown at it would be ripped to small pieces.
Take a look at the pictures again. What do you see? Small pieces of airplane and the Pentagon largely still intact.
THEY FOUND THE FLIGHT RECORDER. THEY FOUND BODY PARTS OF PEOPLE THAT WERE ON THE AIRLINER. GET OVER THE CONSPIRACY THEORY.
Ok terror mongers, I'll tell you why you can't find the plane. After breaking through the first wall, the Pentagon's defense computer realised that the plane would cause an unacceptable amount of damage. Therefore the Pentagon generated a micro-blackhole for a fraction of a second to negate the possiblitity of the plane destroying half the building.
Last edited by the_ubernoob_ (2006-06-03 09:23:07)
Thanks for the constructive criticism.(EUS)Gen.BadSnipaDay wrote:
Get rid of the r in your name and thats why i am not gonna listen to you... remo-r=emo.
rofl...(EUS)Gen.BadSnipaDay wrote:
Get rid of the r in your name and thats why i am not gonna listen to you... remo-r=emo.remo wrote:
Not knowing the facts? Uh, ok. You're ignorant.
The Pentagon isn't your average building. Flying anything at it at a high rate of speed is the same thing as flying into the face of a mountain. The mountain is going to laugh at you and stay there ... and whatever was being flown at it would be ripped to small pieces.
Take a look at the pictures again. What do you see? Small pieces of airplane and the Pentagon largely still intact.
THEY FOUND THE FLIGHT RECORDER. THEY FOUND BODY PARTS OF PEOPLE THAT WERE ON THE AIRLINER. GET OVER THE CONSPIRACY THEORY.
o yea thats right a boeing 757 is the same size as an F4....an F4 moving at 320 MPH is almsot the same as a Boeing 757 prolly twice the size maybe triple the size moving at 500 mph. Concrete isnt that stong to hold back a huge plane from only doing that small of damage.
Last edited by ShellShock.PwN (2006-06-03 09:27:35)
This kind of covers everything...
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/gua … hit-it.htm
...fascinating stuff!
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/gua … hit-it.htm
...fascinating stuff!
DING! Correct!kr@cker wrote:
the terrorists chose these flights because they were long distance flights and would be loaded with as much fuel as possible. Jet fuels have one of the highest octane ratings around and CAN vaporize the lightweight alloys used in aircraft construction, many of the commercial ones being based on some form of aluminum.
And where is this fuel stored? In the wings. Why aren't the wings there? Because the fuel ignited and exploded.
DING! Correct again! Planes aren't like buildings ... they have some reinforced pieces that endure most of the stress ... landing gear, wings, fuselage. When the wings are gone, you have the fuselage ... whoa, like a missile!! What a coincedence!! A missile hit the Pentagon!!!kr@cker wrote:
Reinforced steel is too heavy to make a plane out of, anyone knows that.
If a missle hit the Pentagon, that's the biggest f'in cruise missile I've ever seen.
http://www.planecrashinfo.com/w010704.htm
Where be jet?
It is suspicious though, that the wings did not seem to impact the Pentagon. But I am no aviation expert, so I don't know what happens when a plane crashes into a building like that.
It's so difficult to be neutral lately. And now excuse me, I have to go deal with a trojan I picked up somewhere in the last 5 minutes.
Edit: edited link now until I find out where i got the trojan
Edit2: restored it, I hope it didn't come from that site. tell me if you have any problems.
Where be jet?
It is suspicious though, that the wings did not seem to impact the Pentagon. But I am no aviation expert, so I don't know what happens when a plane crashes into a building like that.
It's so difficult to be neutral lately. And now excuse me, I have to go deal with a trojan I picked up somewhere in the last 5 minutes.
Edit: edited link now until I find out where i got the trojan
Edit2: restored it, I hope it didn't come from that site. tell me if you have any problems.
Last edited by Sorcerer0513 (2006-06-03 09:59:24)
that link you have is amazing +1.
Thanks for pointing that out. Of course they're not the same size ... they are, however, of similar construction. If you flew an F4 at the Pentagon you wouldn't have seen nearly the type of damage ... you would have seen a small fire and a black spot, like in the videos I posted above.ShellShock.PwN wrote:
o yea thats right a boeing 757 is the same size as an F4....an F4 moving at 320 MPH is almsot the same as a Boeing 757 prolly twice the size maybe triple the size moving at 500 mph. Concrete isnt that stong to hold back a huge plane from only doing that small of damage.
The Pentagon isn't concrete. It's a building constructed of reinforced concrete walls, upgraded with bomb-resistant kevlar, bolted steel beams and 2 inch thick bulletproof and bomb-resistant windows. Ie. a bunker.
They probably did ... there just wasn't anything left of them. You're not going to see a "mark" like that on the WTC ... the Pentagon, again, is of completely different construction. It was made to withstand such a destructive force. It's the damn center of the U.S. military!Sorcerer0513 wrote:
It is suspicious though, that the wings did not seem to impact the Pentagon.
WELL DAMMIT SOMEONE TELL ME WHERE THE FUCK WALDO IS!! I GIVE UP!!RicardoBlanco wrote:
This kind of covers everything...
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/gua … hit-it.htm
...fascinating stuff!
hmm neg one for my second post, reason being"_____" signed by "______"
tho i did get a pos karma for my terrorists in toronts post reason being "mmmm" signed by "____"!
can't argue with mmmm
Last edited by kr@cker (2006-06-03 09:40:00)
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf - Pentagon Building Performance Report
Here you all go. Enough conspiracy BS. This is straight from the experts ... ACSE/SEI (American Society of Civil Engineers / Structural Engineering Institute)
Here you all go. Enough conspiracy BS. This is straight from the experts ... ACSE/SEI (American Society of Civil Engineers / Structural Engineering Institute)