JE3146
Member
+109|6863|Oregon
I always used Western Digital. Always always always. I've had 1 drive fail on me in like 8 years and it was a WD. It was replaced by them in less than 2 weeks.

I'll be building a PC for a friend here soon and after reading some reviews, nothing seems that promising.

Seagates appear to be dieing in about 2 to 4 months time.
Hitachi's seem to arrive DOA or die shortly after.
WD's seem to run overly hot. Very very hot.
Maxtor.... is well... Maxtor ( I do own a 200GB PATA drive of theirs and I must say it disproves the negativity towards them. It's been a very reliable drive.... *knock on wood* )


What HD's do you use? I know the Raptor is a popular choice that's had some great reviews, but what about the SATA300 drives? Anyone heard any news of SATA600 drives/mobo controllers yet?
ddenholm67
DanForth Teh Pwnzer
+53|6848|Scotland
raptor ftw.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7008

ddenholm67 wrote:

raptor ftw.
only if u can tolerate its noise and its price.

WD makes really good hdds
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
ddenholm67
DanForth Teh Pwnzer
+53|6848|Scotland
depends really, it does come out on top over any other drive

western digital domake great drives though..
if you want a fast costly drive then go for a raptor,if not, for storage, then something like western dig. will be more appropriate.
cwv_8t88
Member
+3|6831
I own a small computer manufacturing company in upstate New York and I get asked this question by many people including hard core gamers. About 7-8 years ago if you asked me to rank order the best drives I would have said the following:

IBM Deskstar
Maxtor Diamondmax
Seagate (all)
Hitachi
Fuji
Western Digital
All others

But today the standards of the manufactures have become so high due to massive competition that the differences between the drives are so minimal. The better question is not which hardware is better but which service is better if something does go wrong (i.e. you have questions, need to return a faulty drive, etc.). In my opinion, Maxtor is still at the top of my list. I rarely get calls about faulty Maxtor drives but the same can be said for Seagate.

There are two problem you are facing when looking for a good drive:

1 - Crazy Larry - This is a euphamism for the guy that has one Western Digital drive fail on him and suddenly he is spreading that "Western Digital drives suck". Be wary of a sample of one. It seems everyone wishes they were a computer expert these days.

2 - Popular Press - Somewhere there is an article trashing the reputation of every one of the major hard drive manufacturers. Typically, the "tests" they carried out to arrive at this conclusion were hastily carried out and were nothing close to being scientific. They were carried out by people who are paid to create controversy in their articles to keep their columns/jobs.

Sorry to sound so disparate but there is a lot of crap information out there in the mags and on the Internet. Try to find cold, hard facts from reputable sources. But in the mean time keep in mind that the differences in hard drive quality today are minimal.
tupla_s
.
+455|6884|Finland
OMG-AIDS
Member
+24|6855|Florida

tupla_s wrote:

Here's good HD http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10458
I want that
Wow, that is a rediculous ammount of space...you could never use that much in a computer.  And I'd rather put that towards a huge monitor than a HD I could never fill.  Or towards a kick ass computer.
Janus67
Tech God
+86|6887|Ohio, USA
Western Digital, Seagate, Hitachi
sixshot
Decepticon Geek
+50|6967|Planet Seibertron ;)
I personally prefer Seagate... even though I have yet to get one.  I've a WD drive used as a primary drive and for some strange reason, it suddenly started making this sorta high-pitched whining noise.  I could never get rid of it... and often bugs the hell outta me.  The Maxtor drives I have used were all good... I haven't had a drive go ka-put on me yet.  So maybe it's just luck.  Hitachi/IBM Desktars, I dunno... they used to be good back in the days... but after that fall-out with the HDs being flakey... well, you get the picture.

If I was to rank the HDs, I probably would have them in the following order: Seagate, WD, Maxtor, Samsung, Hitachi.  There are other HD brands out there... but those are the ones I'd look at first.  I suggest being picky on warranty, in case a drive decides to go bonkers at the most oddball time.
Janus67
Tech God
+86|6887|Ohio, USA

sixshot wrote:

I personally prefer Seagate... even though I have yet to get one.  I've a WD drive used as a primary drive and for some strange reason, it suddenly started making this sorta high-pitched whining noise.  I could never get rid of it... and often bugs the hell outta me.  The Maxtor drives I have used were all good... I haven't had a drive go ka-put on me yet.  So maybe it's just luck.  Hitachi/IBM Desktars, I dunno... they used to be good back in the days... but after that fall-out with the HDs being flakey... well, you get the picture.

If I was to rank the HDs, I probably would have them in the following order: Seagate, WD, Maxtor, Samsung, Hitachi.  There are other HD brands out there... but those are the ones I'd look at first.  I suggest being picky on warranty, in case a drive decides to go bonkers at the most oddball time.
as of recent Hitachi has greatly improved their drives, in both longevity and in performance.  Because of the problems I have read and have had with Maxtor drives they pretty much fall at the bottom for me now.
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6859|NYC / Hamburg

seagate and wd are very good. I also have 3 Maxtors (1 really old one died after 4 years of operation (but it was build in like 1995)). I also have a samsung that spinns happyly. the only one where i have made bad experiences was hitachi, but apparentely the quality improved. ie go for the one with the best price/space with the features you want.

And for the raptor being loud: at least i cant hear it over my fans. for the heat: true they do get hot, but thats why you can get active cooling for hds
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
nieker
THE FLYING DUTCH PENGUIN, THE NINTENDO PENGUIN
+191|6919|The Netherlands
i have one hd from philips and it works well
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7008
well i would love 2 X 250gb Sata 300mbs WD drives in raid 0
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Rugmonster
Member
+1|7029
My drive of choise seagate. I have 200GB seagates in two of my systems and they are extremely quiet (as in can't hear them at all), relatively cool and fast enough for me. In my laptop, I'm running an IBM/Hitachi 7200RPM drive that kicks ass, but it's also pretty hot meaning I have to be careful with the laptop to make sure it's getting good airflow from underneath.

In general, I have noticed most failures coming from older IBM Deskstars, but from what I hear, they are awesome now. Maxtor is now owned and manufactured by Seagate. I used to hate Western Digitals, and I still think their bargain consumer stuff is still crap. I don't know, just don't go ultra cheap on your drive and you'll be happy. Seagate does have one of the best warantees in the business at 5 years. Not sure what the other manufacturers have. For reviews on drives, look at Toms Hardware and Anandtech
Zedman
Member
+3|7018|NOVA
I plan on buying a couple of these next chance I get: http://www.newegg.com/product/product.a … 6822148140

In the name it says "Perpendicular Recording", basically means more space per platter. Higher read/write rate, etc.

I've always liked Seagate. I have a Hitachi DeskStar and a Seagate. Both have performed well for me. I've had the Seagate for over 3.5 years now and it hasn't crapped out on me yet! But you know, hard drives are fickle. Some last, some don't.
Psycho
Member since 2005
+44|7068|Kansas, USA

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

well i would love 2 X 250gb Sata 300mbs WD drives in raid 0
There is no such thing as a 300mbs hard drive - period. PATA, SATA and SATA-2 drives are all the same speed. The only difference is the "interface" bandwidth. But drives today max out at around 60-70mbs so they are incapable of saturating the available bandwidth in an ATA100/133 let alone either of the SATA formats.

That's not to say there aren't some benefits to using SATA: each drive is on it's own channel so drives don't have to share bandwidth and there is a very small performance gain due to system overhead. But, most of the benefits of SATA will only be realized in a server setting.

I'm not trying to discourace anyone from getting a SATA drive. In fact, all new drives I buy are/will be SATA. But, do not spend a lot of money for SATA-2 thinking you are going to be getting 300mbs performance.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7008
there is no sata 2... and yes i know 300mbs does not give extra performance... but most drives use it except for raptor btw...
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
InnerMonkey
Member
+62|7010
I'll give you my personal preferences based on my experiences.  For reference, I take care of 500+ desktops as part of my job, and have 15+ assorted drives in operation in my house. I can site failures from any manufacturer, but for the past few years Seagate drives have been the most reliable IDE and SCSI drives hands down.  The only real downside to Seagate IMO is that in order to do the rapid replacement thing, it costs you 20 bucks or so (only done this once with Seagate).  WD, especially the Raptor, are generally the best performing drive.  Every manufacturer has good drives, but on average, WD has the Raptor, so they get top billing on IDE performance.  Maxtor have traditionally been the slower of the big 3, but like I alluded to, they also have some good drives, everyone does.  I've used Maxtor's rapid replacement program numerous times, and it's a fantastic thing.  I can get a replacement drive in 2-3 business days, and have 30 days to backup data from the failing drive before mailing it back to Maxtor.  Factor replacement time into your decision....just in case.  ***edit***   Don't let the last bit throw you.  I've just had lots and lots of Maxtor drives, so it stands to reason I'd have seen more of them die.  Truth be told, I have had a Maxtor drive die under warranty in probably 4 years or so.  Most folks barely use a drive that long.

Just look at the specs and the warranty info, and find what suits you best.  If you're not planning on getting a Raptor, I'd just look at the big 3 and balance price/performance.  If money is not object Raptors+RAID 0 would be uber fast, a little hot (use a fan blowing across the drives if you can).  I can't vouch for the noise level of any drive.  I have numerous PCs and 7 aquariums.  Low level noise isn't something I really notice.

You didn't really mention how much space you want, if you're planning a RAID solution, price point you're looking at etc.  It's hard to recommend a specific drive in this case.  I guess if you've got the cash, buy a small Raptor for games, maybe even OS, and use a more reasonably priced drive for storage.


Regarding the Lacie NAS box.  Those are supposed to be nice.  I have a 1.6TB terastation from Buffalotech.  It's a little slow, but otherwise just fine.  I run RAID5 on it and use it as a lazy man's backup.  Important stuff (photos etc) still get backed up to DVDR and put in a safety deposit box.  Everyone should do that!

Last edited by InnerMonkey (2006-06-04 08:27:27)

99Ram2500
Member
+6|6907
Ive used maxtors for my last 7 or so drives or so.. not a single failure. My company preaches WD so when I went SATA, i went WD 160gb.  First one failed within 3 months.  Replaced, more disk errors.  Decided to throw it and bought a 250gb.  Crashed during a game, rebooted to NTLDR missing.  RMA'd and setup raid striping on the return and a new 250..

Figure they all are crap and will die so just raid stripe them to make it a fast death and keep your data backed up.

Brand doesnt really matter anymore.  To think the brand matters as far as reliability goes is like saying which car will let me drive away after a head on 60mph collision with a semi.  Youre stupid to favor any particular brand.

Just buy something and when it fails understand thats the nature of the product and move on.
InnerMonkey
Member
+62|7010
Every manufacturer has a bad model from time to time.  The best example being the IBM deathstar drives.  I went through 8 of those under warranty on a single purchase (so what's that....3 years at the time).  I had the same issue with 4-6gb WDs years ago, and I've seen the same thing out of fujitsu 2.5 inch drives.  If I thought more, I'm sure I could come up with more examples.

WDs generally run hot, and maybe that's what is killing yours.  Where I work has some hot areas (over 100 F in the winter), and I burn through drives in those places sometimes.  BTW, Seagate drives seem to do better in those locations.
Timelord_
Member
+25|6829
Avoid maxtor like the plague...
JE3146
Member
+109|6863|Oregon

InnerMonkey wrote:

Every manufacturer has a bad model from time to time.  The best example being the IBM deathstar drives.  I went through 8 of those under warranty on a single purchase (so what's that....3 years at the time).  I had the same issue with 4-6gb WDs years ago, and I've seen the same thing out of fujitsu 2.5 inch drives.  If I thought more, I'm sure I could come up with more examples.

WDs generally run hot, and maybe that's what is killing yours.  Where I work has some hot areas (over 100 F in the winter), and I burn through drives in those places sometimes.  BTW, Seagate drives seem to do better in those locations.
I still have a 40GB deathstar that I salvaged out of a P3 system eons ago lol.

Still works.... gives a few of those wierd ass "eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee" sounds everyother day or so, but it still works.... Granted it's a file drive, and not a highly accessed main drive now.
JE3146
Member
+109|6863|Oregon

Timelord_ wrote:

Avoid maxtor like the plague...
As I said in my original post, I run a 200GB maxtor. After thinking about it, my sister runs an 80GB Maxtor, and my girlfriend also runs an 80GB Maxtor.

None have had any problems.... *knock on wood*....

People badmouth Maxtor, and hell I'm guilty as any, but the more I think about it, the more they've been downright reliable in comparison...
slo5oh
Member
+28|6953
I think innermonkey derseves some karma, he pegged it.

I live by seagate.  They are #1 in my book (ichiban if I was japanese, but I'm not)
WD makes nice drives, but I too turned away from them in the sub 10 gig days when they were turning out garbage.
Maxtor were always too loud back in the day.  They are not overly loud now, but I see them dropping like rocks at the 2 year mark.  To qualify that statement, I'm currently a network administrator that also does desktop support.  I have been doing this type work for over 10 years.  I've seen dells and IBMs, both using maxtor drives drop like rocks usually at the 2 year mark.  I lost 4 out of 10 IBMs (an order that came in together) last summer and the other 6 are still running today.  That was 40%, not too good in my book. 

For the DIY or BIY (build it yourselfer) I always advise the same, for my money either stick with a rock solid seagate, or spend the extra and get a rapor.  I hear they are a little loud though.  That's the only thing holding me back from trying one in my current system.  The whole system is super quiet and the Seagate drive is so quiet that I can only tell the HDD is in use by looking for the blue HDD LED on the front.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,058|7064|PNW

OMG-AIDS wrote:

tupla_s wrote:

Here's good HD http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10458
I want that
Wow, that is a rediculous ammount of space...you could never use that much in a computer.  And I'd rather put that towards a huge monitor than a HD I could never fill.  Or towards a kick ass computer.
Ahh...the infamous last words. Well, not last. He's still in business...

I can think of plenty of ways to overflow a 2.5TB drive, most involving video editing. Uncompressed video is notoriously huge, and in the editing process it gets duplicated alot. And all my games installed would take at least 300GB.

But as for my preferred brand, WD.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-06-04 22:37:13)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard