the way chatbots lace words together creeps me the heck out
"this incident was notable among the community"
"here are some insights based on his contributions"
"these members exemplify the diverse and dynamic interactions that have characterized the bf2s.com forums over the years"
"was instrumental in creating and maintaining"
participates in discussions across multiple sections, including "visual media" and "tech"" / "known for participating in discussions related to visual media"
"exemplified the enthusiasm"
"forming bonds that lasted well after the game's heyday"
"a rich diversity to the community that went beyond gaming"
side note, if you can get a chatbot to glitch out, an output may devolve into random word soup. each word individually could've fit into a response to user input, but makes no sense next to its neighbor. things like punctuation and ending a paragraph are all but tossed aside. imo, this is more interesting to read through than the painfully "safe," obsessed-with-inoffensiveness stricture of chatgpt. nothing like a program that speaks high and mighty about relying on verifiable information, and yet still get stuff wrong
all the time.chat ai is sometimes so much like the classic random fingers on each hand, limbs out of nowhere, and the characteristicly gooey, dead eyeballs in each socket. but with words.
there's an increasingly disturbing trend of people in some of my circles who consult chatbots for information and will come at me with some unfounded factoid proven wrong by books or even level 1 google-fu. but how do you argue with someone who gets all their takes from grok?
from x.ai:
Explore Grok, the AI by xAI designed to answer nearly any question with an outside perspective on humanity. Dive into insightful, often humorous responses, and get help on a wide range of topics, from the mundane to the profound.
ffs it even sounds like it was written by a chatbot. "from the mundane to the profound," blech.
i fully expect right-wing reporting on the next big race protests to heavily feature ai-manipulated photojournalism. they'll finally get that picture of seattle burning or whatever without having to straight up use pictures from another city in a past decade, and it'll be the first thing i see forwarded to me when checking my email some morning. i'll circle the six joints on a brick-thrower's finger, and i bet the person who sent it will argue that the depicted is mutant with a lazy eye.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2025-01-27 09:02:32)