Dilbert: I know, cage fights!
Yes, I stand corrected. A bigger cage. So much better.2 hours, 53 minutes ago Dilbert_X (1765) DAST Chat Stadium fights you moron - DX
Dilbert: I know, cage fights!
Yes, I stand corrected. A bigger cage. So much better.2 hours, 53 minutes ago Dilbert_X (1765) DAST Chat Stadium fights you moron - DX
I've put forward a workable solution lets hear yours.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Dilbert: I know, cage fights!Yes, I stand corrected. A bigger cage. So much better.2 hours, 53 minutes ago Dilbert_X (1765) DAST Chat Stadium fights you moron - DX
They're doing it already, they have a massive surfeit of males. Besides Uighur rape camps and Hazara sex slaves is there a solution?But we can't do anything about population because chinese and indians and pakistanis etc will select male children
Forbes wrote:
Every new child brings another mouth to fill, to be sure, but every child also brings another brain that has almost unlimited capabilities. When they are free, more people mean more ideas and more innovation. Scrooge’s most blameworthy attribute is, unfortunately, shared by many self-styled humanitarians. The evidence in support of the thesis that more people leads to more wealth is clear and nearly overwhelming. Rather than waiting for people to die so that they can decrease the surplus population, we should be looking for better ways to align incentives so as to encourage more innovation.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/artcarden/ … 5c97445aea
unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Dilbert: "arena battles to control the surplus male population garnered from bizarre policy is a workable solution. what's your workable solution?"
"Why don't you like my human sacrifice idea? What's your better idea?" I'm sorry but the burden of this death battles notion is entirely on you. Also you, "all this religious hoodoo is pretty bad. Anyway, let me tell you about my pseudoscientific opinions."
Dilbert_X wrote:
I've put forward a workable solution lets hear yours.
Right? But as robotic as "more people = more wealth" outlook is, it's at the very least more positive than Dilbert's "the only way forward is to turn the planet into Borderlands," which I'm still waiting for him to explain as a "workable solution." Deathmatches, what in the dystopian #*(&. Even Scrooge himself would probably raise an eyebrow.uziq wrote:
more ‘wealth’ is a cringemaking way of looking at human life. how very forbesian.
saying that capitalism's model of infinite growth/infinite expansion is fundamentally flawed is nothing like endorsing malthusian population doom-mongering, or their corollaries, eugenics and social engineering. you do realize that malthus and marx were writing roughly contemporarily, right, and were aware of the other's work? marx and engel both explicitly criticized malthus's 'population principle'.Dilbert_X wrote:
Wait, it seems like yesterday you were ridiculing me for Malthusian gloom-mongering.
Most people don't even attempt to use their brains, more people is not the solution.
Last edited by uziq (2022-01-18 03:44:38)
The discussion is about Marx and Malthus.uziq wrote:
did marx … and engels … propose anything?
Last edited by uziq (2022-01-19 13:10:55)
Last edited by uziq (2022-01-19 14:13:07)
I like SPAM fried.uziq wrote:
have to lol at the hotdog/mystery meats though. it’s one of the quirks of korean cuisine. they basically have adapted 1950s GI mess tin food into their ‘folk’ cuisine. there’s a ‘GI’ or ‘soldier’s stew’ here that literally has SPAM as its main ingredient (cf. hawaiian, pacific islander and phillipino diets, i guess).
That's my excuse too, but all I'd really have to do is chuck a couple gadgets into a cabinet.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
I too want to make my own noodles, just to understand how difficult it is. I don't currently have the counter space though.