Afghanistan is close enough to the Middle East, fuck off.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Geography is not your strong suit I guess
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Afghanistan is close enough to the Middle East, fuck off.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Geography is not your strong suit I guess
I feel you. Where do you expect our next major war to be?War Man wrote:
To be honest anywhere in the Middle East sounds horrible. I may be pissed that the fighting there was all for nothing, but at the same time relieved at the possibility of the next war NOT being there.SuperJail Warden wrote:
In all seriousness, would you like to go to Afghanistan for round 2 with the Taliban/ISIS if someone put a button in front of you to make it happen?
Why are we occupying heaven?If the Army and the Navy
Ever look on Heaven's scenes. They will find the streets are guarded
By United States Marines
Not long ago, Dilbert labeled South Korea as "somewhere in Southeast Asia." Afghanistan is not a part of the Middle East. "Close enough" doesn't cut it. Mexico isn't a part of Central America, either.War Man wrote:
Afghanistan is close enough to the Middle East, fuck off.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Geography is not your strong suit I guess
I am betting on Latin America. The cartels are militarized enough to make it interesting and we have an excuse of it being in our backyard.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I wonder what the next flavor-of-the-day region for our next forever-war will be, that Americans will be "relieved" to wash their hands of after?
I think one of the mistakes we make while doing our nation-building hobby is to disregard or generalize the culture(s) of the places we are occupying. Failing to understand attitudes, moods. "Afghanistan is close enough."SuperJail Warden wrote:
The religion, type of warfare, and phenotype of the people we fought in Afghanistan isn't too far off from the Middle East. It's not like he said Afghanistan is in Australia.
Last edited by uziq (2021-08-27 22:30:33)
Oh I'm a bigot now? Afghanistan is literally right next to Iran, is that the end of the eastern most side of Middle East for you or do I need to go more west? I am not dilbert if you hadn't noticed and I remember laughing when he said southeast Asia as he wasn't even fucking close, Afghanistan at least is close.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Not long ago, Dilbert labeled South Korea as "somewhere in Southeast Asia." Afghanistan is not a part of the Middle East. "Close enough" doesn't cut it. Mexico isn't a part of Central America, either.War Man wrote:
Afghanistan is close enough to the Middle East, fuck off.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Geography is not your strong suit I guess
This isn't all to be pedantic or anything. Very roughly generalizing geography like that isn't uncommon of bigots.
Last edited by War Man (2021-08-28 10:34:43)
If you are following that kind of logic. If say, Wales and/or Scotland were to secede from UK and join EU, would Britain be considered European?RTHKI wrote:
one isnt europe cause they voted to leave
I didn't say that, and I don't think you are. But a lot of that inaccurate "over there" or "close enough" generalization stuff (be better) is a feature of those attitudes.War Man wrote:
Oh I'm a bigot now?
Mexico is right next to Guatemala, but is not a part of Central America. Afghanistan does border the Middle East (Iran, which also borders Turkmenistan, Pakistan). UK and Ireland are indeed considered a part of Europe (Western Europe), regardless of EU stuff. Pakistan, India a part of South Asia. Afghanistan is a part of the Far East. Indonesia is 80-something percent Muslim, but not considered a part of the Middle East.Afghanistan is literally right next to Iran, is that the end of the eastern most side of Middle East for you or do I need to go more west? I am not dilbert if you hadn't noticed and I remember laughing when he said southeast Asia as he wasn't even fucking close, Afghanistan at least is close.
Next you'll be telling me Ireland and Britain aren't Europe because they aren't on the mainland continent.
Wikipedia on Tuesday updated its page ‘War in Afghanistan’ and listed the result of the 20-year conflict as a “Taliban victory”.
A blog post titled “The Taliban’s victory proves the West has failed to learn the lessons of the past” which was written by Effie G. H. Pedaliu at the London School of Economics, has been cited as a primary source in the edit.
Articles from the New York Times, Fox News, Politico, BBC News, The Washington Post, Radio France Internationale and Deutsche Welle referencing the Taliban victory have also been included in the web resource’s footnotes, News Week reported.
It’s a description that is unlikely to sit well with many Americans, particularly given Wikipedia’s status as the world’s largest and most popular reference website.