Not exactly a negative thing, we've done this before and it wasn't bad. Besides, Belgium has had a longer period of no government than we have.AussieReaper wrote:
Silly Americans. You don't even have a government.
Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.
The end of the world would be less likely if the Orange Messiah weren't in charge.War Man wrote:
What's wrong with the end of the world guys?
You misquoted me, reread the previous post and realize what I was talking about.Dilbert_X wrote:
The end of the world would be less likely if the Orange Messiah weren't in charge.War Man wrote:
What's wrong with the end of the world guys?
I can't think of anything worse than allowing politicians to vote themselves more money.SuperJail Warden wrote:
It is annoying having to read articles about who raised more campaign money. Publicly financed campaigns should be something the country works towards.
Its a problem that in the short term companies think they can save money by hiring cheaper immigrants, often to plug the gap until they offshore entirely.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
its crazy to me that people are worried that low-skilled, uneducated immigrants who can't speak english will take their jobs.
I don't know many people who have gone through our school system and don't feel they are above picking fruit in a field or working in a slaughterhouse. I certainly wouldn't want to do those jobs. If we block immigration I don't think the jobs would be taken by American-born people unless wages rose astronomically, but then they'd just be automated.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
its crazy to me that people are worried that low-skilled, uneducated immigrants who can't speak english will take their jobs.