It's not happening. The UK Supreme court (one below the High Court, so not the final court of appeal) ruled that the referendum is invalid due to parliamentary sovereignty (ah doi).SuperJail Warden wrote:
How is Brexit going? Serious question, not trolling. The media here doesn't talk about it much anymore. From what I understand the conservatives were afraid to pull the trigger on it and it is stalled in the courts?
the supreme court is much higher than the high court and is the final court of appeal (except the europeans on civil matters). it's kind of in the name. you don't have a 'supreme' court that is bound to a higher authority.Cybargs wrote:
It's not happening. The UK Supreme court (one below the High Court, so not the final court of appeal) ruled that the referendum is invalid due to parliamentary sovereignty (ah doi).SuperJail Warden wrote:
How is Brexit going? Serious question, not trolling. The media here doesn't talk about it much anymore. From what I understand the conservatives were afraid to pull the trigger on it and it is stalled in the courts?
So it's up to the MPs to trigger Article 50.
fuck i wrote it the wrong (australian) way.uziq wrote:
the supreme court is much higher than the high court and is the final court of appeal (except the europeans on civil matters). it's kind of in the name. you don't have a 'supreme' court that is bound to a higher authority.Cybargs wrote:
It's not happening. The UK Supreme court (one below the High Court, so not the final court of appeal) ruled that the referendum is invalid due to parliamentary sovereignty (ah doi).SuperJail Warden wrote:
How is Brexit going? Serious question, not trolling. The media here doesn't talk about it much anymore. From what I understand the conservatives were afraid to pull the trigger on it and it is stalled in the courts?
So it's up to the MPs to trigger Article 50.
Last edited by uziq (2016-11-16 11:25:46)
What about divorced parents who live in separate countries due to work reasons. it happens.SuperJail Warden wrote:
Didn't have to marry her. Could have continued to live a 10 minute drive away from his kid instead of moving to the other side of the country.
My cousin knocked up some chick when they were both 18. She decided to move to another state as well and never had a job.SuperJail Warden wrote:
There is a big difference between moving for work and moving to Texas to buy a house after winning the lotto.
And I don't think mothers should be split off from their children like that. You sound like the kind of guy who thinks girls "should have just gotten an abortion"
I am sorry you come from a broken home. But there was literally no reason for this guy to move. He lived in the nice part of NJ, Hoboken.Cybargs wrote:
My cousin knocked up some chick when they were both 18. She decided to move to another state as well and never had a job.SuperJail Warden wrote:
There is a big difference between moving for work and moving to Texas to buy a house after winning the lotto.
And I don't think mothers should be split off from their children like that. You sound like the kind of guy who thinks girls "should have just gotten an abortion"
My parents were divorced and lived in separate countries. Welcome to life.
I'm sure your cousin wanted to get out of the shithole that is NJ.
naw divorced parents is pretty fucking awesome.SuperJail Warden wrote:
I am sorry you come from a broken home. But there was literally no reason for this guy to move. He lived in the nice part of NJ, Hoboken.Cybargs wrote:
My cousin knocked up some chick when they were both 18. She decided to move to another state as well and never had a job.SuperJail Warden wrote:
There is a big difference between moving for work and moving to Texas to buy a house after winning the lotto.
And I don't think mothers should be split off from their children like that. You sound like the kind of guy who thinks girls "should have just gotten an abortion"
My parents were divorced and lived in separate countries. Welcome to life.
I'm sure your cousin wanted to get out of the shithole that is NJ.
Last edited by SuperJail Warden (2016-12-05 13:05:33)
The jury had three options, besides deadlocking: a conviction for murder, a conviction for voluntary manslaughter or an acquittal.SuperJail Warden wrote:
you can literally shoot a guy on video and there will be jurors who find the cop not guilty. amazing
^^^ this.AussieReaper wrote:
The jury had three options, besides deadlocking: a conviction for murder, a conviction for voluntary manslaughter or an acquittal.SuperJail Warden wrote:
you can literally shoot a guy on video and there will be jurors who find the cop not guilty. amazing
In a letter to Judge Newman on Friday, a single juror said he could not “in good conscience consider a guilty verdict.”
The jury could have decided to placate this one objector and press for voluntary manslaughter. They seem to have held their ground that it was a murder.
A mistrial is actually the best outcome, as the next set of jurors will hopefully deliver a unanimous decision and actually convict the officer of murder rather than the manslaughter option.
Last edited by SuperJail Warden (2016-12-06 06:57:24)
SuperJail Warden wrote:
Going to age out of my mother's healthcare plan on the Jan 1st. She is a state worker and her health insurance is A+. Really not looking forward to having to shop around and deal with all this insurance crap. This is doubly so considering I am dangerously mentally ill.
Last edited by uziq (2016-12-22 14:20:40)
