For some reason I doubt they will make a 3rd BC. I just think if they did, people would wonder why they didn't include the destruction in BF3. Remember when they said how FB3 was going to include *more* destruction than BC2? And remember all the misleading trailers, with carefully edited shots where they made you think that all of those paris buildings would be collapsible? sigh. They've "made their decision" already. Why go back now?
Started playing BF1943, again. I like how the explosions/smoke are kind of cel shaded or something. Its better than the "omg realism" in BF3 where smoke covers everything, framerate drops to shit and everything looks ugly as fuck. I prefer the colorful/cartoony look of 1943. The maps are gorgeous. I've probably already said it here on bf2s in the past, but it really is a true battlefield game. Planes, boats, tanks and classes are all perfectly balanced. Plus it also has destruction.