Ah these girls are white. No white women discussion thread.
why does a college kid need to hook up with a 17 year old. she'll be inexperienced and you'll feel rotten. plus half the attraction is in breaking the social taboo around hitting one of your sister's friends. it feels daring and risque, hence exciting and attractive. really, if you looked at it in the harsh cold light of day, it would seem banal and kind of pathetic.
My age is showing, but girls under 25 don't attract me at all anymore.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
yeah right
Don't get me wrong, nice to look at, but I wouldn't be able to talk to them for more than ten minutes without getting bored or annoyed. I'm sure you feel the same way about teenage girls now that you're done with college.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
yeah right
Last edited by Jay (2013-05-05 14:52:29)
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
yes, i do. but my point was just that women aged 18-25 are at their prime, hormonally/pheromonally speaking. everything about their physique and behaviour during those ages is crying out to be screwed. i don't think any dude with a libido can be honest with himself and say he wouldn't find a 21 year old belle at her peak attractive. being tolerable/mature/not full of crazy is another thing entirely. i don't think our basic mating instincts evolved with domestic considerations in mind.
No, but I'd like to think, even among the less civilized rungs of society, that we've evolved beyond a purely animalistic drive when it comes to procreating. You're basically saying that you think every man should walk around and sniff the ass off every 20-25 year old woman to see if shes in heat? Complex personality is part of what makes us human and those personalities don't always mix. Personalities can also mature to the point where younger personalities are no longer attractive.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
yes, i do. but my point was just that women aged 18-25 are at their prime, hormonally/pheromonally speaking. everything about their physique and behaviour during those ages is crying out to be screwed. i don't think any dude with a libido can be honest with himself and say he wouldn't find a 21 year old belle at her peak attractive. being tolerable/mature/not full of crazy is another thing entirely. i don't think our basic mating instincts evolved with domestic considerations in mind.
i never said he'd fall in love with every young woman. i just said you probably never get too old to lust after a young belle who is fresh, taut, supple, in full natural bloom. plus that and all the hormones flowing around a person of that age-bracket. i just said there would always be a primal regard for young, attractive women. i think we both knew we weren't talking about falling in love with them, just because.
The girls who were kidnapped in Ohio reminds me of that season of Dexter. very disturbing stuff.
I'll take his word for over yours simply because he is old and you are not. His statement holds approximately 100% more weight than yours.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
i never said he'd fall in love with every young woman. i just said you probably never get too old to lust after a young belle who is fresh, taut, supple, in full natural bloom. plus that and all the hormones flowing around a person of that age-bracket. i just said there would always be a primal regard for young, attractive women. i think we both knew we weren't talking about falling in love with them, just because.
It looks as though I was right about Benghazi and the subsequent coverup..
Soooo.... Fuck you Ty, Recipro, and shocking. lemmings.
Soooo.... Fuck you Ty, Recipro, and shocking. lemmings.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
I take Jay's words at more of a Louis CK kind of approach to young woman, insofar as he thinks they're attractive, but they're not gonna fuck him anymore, which he knows so he can just slag them off and stop trying to impress them/deal with their shit.Extra Medium wrote:
I'll take his word for over yours simply because he is old and you are not. His statement holds approximately 100% more weight than yours.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
i never said he'd fall in love with every young woman. i just said you probably never get too old to lust after a young belle who is fresh, taut, supple, in full natural bloom. plus that and all the hormones flowing around a person of that age-bracket. i just said there would always be a primal regard for young, attractive women. i think we both knew we weren't talking about falling in love with them, just because.
yeah i mean it's not like my point isn't based on basic chemistry and behavioral science or anthropology or anything. let's trust jay and take his word for it, cause he's in his 30's and says he doesn't fancy 21 year olds anymore (liar).Extra Medium wrote:
I'll take his word for over yours simply because he is old and you are not. His statement holds approximately 100% more weight than yours.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
i never said he'd fall in love with every young woman. i just said you probably never get too old to lust after a young belle who is fresh, taut, supple, in full natural bloom. plus that and all the hormones flowing around a person of that age-bracket. i just said there would always be a primal regard for young, attractive women. i think we both knew we weren't talking about falling in love with them, just because.
You are a giant bag of douche. That's, like, the only way I can explain it, a giant bag of douche.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
yeah i mean it's not like my point isn't based on basic chemistry and behavioral science or anthropology or anything. let's trust jay and take his word for it, cause he's in his 30's and says he doesn't fancy 21 year olds anymore (liar).Extra Medium wrote:
I'll take his word for over yours simply because he is old and you are not. His statement holds approximately 100% more weight than yours.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
i never said he'd fall in love with every young woman. i just said you probably never get too old to lust after a young belle who is fresh, taut, supple, in full natural bloom. plus that and all the hormones flowing around a person of that age-bracket. i just said there would always be a primal regard for young, attractive women. i think we both knew we weren't talking about falling in love with them, just because.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22459815A prominent barrister specialising in reproductive rights has called for the age of consent to be lowered to 13.
Barbara Hewson told online magazine Spiked that the move was necessary in the wake of the Savile scandal to end the "persecution of old men".
She also said that complainants should no longer receive anonymity.
The NSPCC called her views "outdated and simply ill-informed" and said to hear them "from a highly experienced barrister simply beggars belief".
Her remarks come after a number of high-profile arrests over allegations of historical sexual offences in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal.
Among those to have been convicted is former BBC broadcaster Stuart Hall, who admitted 14 charges of indecently assaulting girls, including one aged nine, between 1967 and 1985.
Ms Hewson described Hall's crimes as "low-level misdemeanours" which "ordinarily... would not be prosecuted".
'Prurient charade'
"What we have here is the manipulation of the British criminal justice system to produce scapegoats on demand. It is a grotesque spectacle," she said.
"It's time to end this prurient charade, which has nothing to do with justice or the public interest."
She argues for an end to complainant anonymity, a strict statute of limitations to prevent prosecutions after a substantial amount of time has passed and a reduction in the age of consent to 13.
She said that "touching a 17-year-old's breast, kissing a 13-year-old, or putting one's hand up a 16-year-old's skirt" are not crimes comparable to gang rapes and murders and "anyone suggesting otherwise has lost touch with reality".
The NSPCC described crimes such as Hall's as "incredibly serious" and said that "to minimise and trivialise the impact of these offences for victims in this way is all but denying that they have in fact suffered abuse at all.
"Any suggestion of lowering the age of consent could put more young people at risk from those who prey on vulnerable young people."
It also argued that complainant anonymity should be maintained and that historical prosecutions should be allowed as "many who are abused are bullied, blackmailed and shamed into staying silent, often well into adulthood".
Nope. Normal adult men don't grope 13 year olds.
Fuck Israel
take it to the big-girl problems threadExtra Medium wrote:
You are a giant bag of douche. That's, like, the only way I can explain it, a giant bag of douche.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
yeah i mean it's not like my point isn't based on basic chemistry and behavioral science or anthropology or anything. let's trust jay and take his word for it, cause he's in his 30's and says he doesn't fancy 21 year olds anymore (liar).Extra Medium wrote:
I'll take his word for over yours simply because he is old and you are not. His statement holds approximately 100% more weight than yours.
No, more like amazed at the absolute absurdity of you and Uzique. It's like neither one of you has actually ever visited or lived in the real world. Both of you seem to have a college desk opinion of how the world does and should work without regard to blunt reality or common sense.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Have you been breaking bread with burnzz and atg?Extra Medium wrote:
You are a giant bag of douche. That's, like, the only way I can explain it, a giant bag of douche.
In two days of me posting here this time, between the two of you, you've said:
Eating meat is stupid.
Humans are only attracted to physical traits and personality plays no part in human mating rituals.
Organic farming can feed the world.
People who visit certain websites that contain idiotic communities are idiots even if they don't participate in said communities.
A justice department report was biased because the website that linked to the justice department report was biased.
A justice department report was stupid because the website that linked to the justice department report had stupid comments on it.
Implied that anyone who reads any news source or website that you don't approve of or agree with loses credibility instantly.
Go live in Iran, I get the feeling you would be happier there.
where did i say eating meat is stupid? i eat meat every day. i said eating red meat often is unnecessary.
where did i say humans are only attracted by physical traits? i just said it's unlikely a man will cease to find all 21-year olds physically attractive.
where did i say organic farming can feed the world? i said people outside of cities can make easy steps towards greater self-sufficiency.
where did i say a website you visit determines you? i said it's funny that you espouse right-wing opinions and frequent liveleak.
you are a fucking idiot of the highest order. seriously. and you accuse me of reading comprehension issues. you have a childish knack for hyperbole and reductio ad absurdum. i suggest you go take some rhetoric lessons from those pesky "college desk" sorts.
where did i say humans are only attracted by physical traits? i just said it's unlikely a man will cease to find all 21-year olds physically attractive.
where did i say organic farming can feed the world? i said people outside of cities can make easy steps towards greater self-sufficiency.
where did i say a website you visit determines you? i said it's funny that you espouse right-wing opinions and frequent liveleak.
you are a fucking idiot of the highest order. seriously. and you accuse me of reading comprehension issues. you have a childish knack for hyperbole and reductio ad absurdum. i suggest you go take some rhetoric lessons from those pesky "college desk" sorts.
Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-05-09 11:23:23)
You can't even comprehend basic english. If you bothered to read (or comprehend) I said "between the two of you). That means some of the statements were from him and some from you.Uzique The Lesser wrote:
where did i say eating meat is stupid? i eat meat every day. i said eating red meat often is unnecessary.
where did i say humans are only attracted by physical traits? i just said it's unlikely a man will cease to find all 21-year olds physically attractive.
where did i say organic farming can feed the world? i said people outside of cities can make easy steps towards greater self-sufficiency.
where did i say a website you visit determines you? i said it's funny that you espouse right-wing opinions and frequent liveleak.
you are a fucking idiot of the highest order. seriously. and you accuse me of reading comprehension issues. you have a childish knack for hyperbole and reductio ad absurdum. i suggest you go take some rhetoric lessons from those pesky "college desk" sorts.
I refuse to debate (read: pointlessly argue) with you and your friend who are obviously outside of reasoning with anyone who has an opinion other than their own.
i'd suggest you refrain from making comments such as "you can't even comprehend basic english" or accusing us of "absurdity", when the basic tact of your posts is 'twist something someone said beyond all recognition and then put it back in their mouth'. oh, and i already skipped over the stupid news-comments parts that were aimed at newbie. the other parts all applied to conversations we have had.
Last edited by Uzique The Lesser (2013-05-09 12:13:19)
I would also like that:Extra Medium wrote:
[...]
1. I never said eating meat was stupid, but I do think eating too much red meat is problematic.
2. One person out of five hundred people being motivated enough to grow a tomato plant isn't going to solve world hunger, but what's your problem with trying to convince more people to grow stuff if they have access to dirt, water and sunlight?
3. I didn't call you an idiot for linking to Breitbart. I was curious about what kind of people read it and got an idea from the comments I've read. It's about as objective as moveon.org with the occasional movie review thrown in for some odd reason. Why do you even read it?
To answer your question in the other thread, I would call pewresearch.org a more objective improvement. Breitbart is even described by wikipedia in the first sentence as "a conservative news and opinion website." Well no duh.
Uzique and I are not "best friends irl" with this planned out via Teamspeak. We just both don't agree with you atm.
Stephen Hawking joins academic boycott of Israel
Do you think the BDS movement has the potential to influence Israel's policies?
Do you think the BDS movement has the potential to influence Israel's policies?
Last edited by 13/f/taiwan (2013-05-09 15:49:40)
Nothing else has.
Related: Stephen Hawking accused of hypocrisy over Israel conference boycott
Seems pretty goofy since Intel is all over the globe.
Seems pretty goofy since Intel is all over the globe.
• This article was amended on 9 May 2013 to remove a reference to Intel being an Israeli firm. It is a US multinational with bases in Israel.