rdx-fx
...
+955|6842

aynrandroolz wrote:

american delusion. to call the iraq-afghan wars a 'third world war' shows just how inflated america's sense of conflict (and by extension, importance) really is.

9/11 was not an 'unprovoked' attack. it was america finally, after nearly half a century of neo-imperialist rule and foreign-policy intereference, finally reaping what it had sowed.

ditto the financial crash. an elementary education in middle-east history and in 1980's->2000's economic policy will show you clearly enough why america was to become the single greatest locus for islamic hatred, and why a huge financial sector bubble was long due a prickly pinned pop-cum-detonation.
American delusion?  You take ATG's opinion as American opinion in general.  Talk about inflation...

"half a century of neo-imperialist rule". So 1979-2001, 22 years, is half a century?

You conveniently forget to mention the real imperialist nations, England & France.
You forget that most of the borders in the Middle East and Africa were drawn by England & Russia during the "Great Game", in the 150+ years of English, Russian, and French imperialism before 1979.
You forget that Iraq was a colonial territory of England, as were India/Pakistan.

For a literature genius, you don't seem to have heard of T.E. Lawrence "of Arabia",
nor Albert Camus (wrote extensively about French Imperialism in Algeria),
nor Rudyard Kipling (wrote extensively on British Imperialism in India, Africa, and the Middle East)

Your England, Your Europe drew the artificial borders in the Middle East, which is a root cause of the unrest in the middle east.
Kurds in Iraq sound familiar? Ethnic and religious unrest in the middle east is your fucked up policy of "let's draw borders with Crayons! Based on English ideas!!Fuck the savage natives!!!"

The US foreign policy in the middle east, from 1979 (Fall of the Shah of Iran) to 2001 (9/11) was a mistake.
We had a policy of backing Sunni despots, dictators, and dickheads - because we thought we could do business with them, and they seemed the best able to maintain stable governments in their countries.
In a practical sense, we were wrong.
In an ethical sense, we were almost criminally negligent.

22 years of backing the wrong heads of state in the middle east, and Uzi thinks the US 'deserved' 9/11..
I wonder what he thinks Europe and England 'deserve' for the 150 years of the Great Game, 750 years of imperialism, the Mandate of Palestine (Israel), and the arbitrary borders drawn for middle eastern countries after WW-II?

Oh, and the British Mandate of Palestine in 1917, the founding of a homeland for European Jews displaced by pogroms in Europe, the European Holocaust, and making the state of Israel... remind me who's fault that little experiment was?


(Oh, and most of those Jews the Europeans and Russians didn't want, ended up in the USA.
Not Israel.
Thanks for that. 
Einstein & Co. did wonders to advance US science & industry over European science for a few decades)
rdx-fx
...
+955|6842
An Englishman talking about hubris, ego, imperialism, and 'getting what you deserve'...

Only people on the fucking planet that have absolutely zero place to chide anyone else on racist imperialism.

Next he'll be lecturing me on good beer, dental plans, and military procedures.

Last edited by rdx-fx (2012-12-31 16:07:30)

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6356|eXtreme to the maX
The British and French empires were finished a century ago, the US has been pulling the strings ever since.

9/11 Was one of  the puppets twanging a string and catching the puppet-master in the eye, not much more than that.
Fuck Israel
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4505
you continually talk about inflation... and then extrapolate particular posts i make to particular posters (jay being a mercenary - you shit bricks and think i'm calling all american soldiers mercenaries; atg with his typical paranoiac delusions - you think i'm inditing all americans, etc.). it's hilarious because i'm pretty sure you're just looking for an easy excuse to vent and get shit off your chest. i have never said or indicated anywhere that all "americans" suffer from atg's delusion. but he does exhibit a delusion from the american perspective if he likens iraq-afghan to the two world wars, no? atg is a certain 'type' of american, from a wide-enough (european) perspective: he falls into that wide 'god-fearing' bracket, and he's posted about 1,000 threads on here in the past with plenty of eschatological and conspiratorial nonsense. my post and its tone was clearly in response to who i was quoting. so let's not talk of 'inflation'. i'm not putting myself - or the country i represent - on any sort of pedestal, here; i'm not trying to give any lessons.

and what does europe's colonizing have to do with anything? i'm not saying 'america r bad kekekeke'. i'm saying 9/11 wasn't spontaneous. nor was the last financial crisis. 9/11 wasn't a historical anomaly or an act of senseless violence. it wasn't the malefic islamists and their thirst for white blood - much as someone of shifty's age/generation, after 10 years of fox news and neo-con crowing, would probably believe. nowhere am i saying or even implying on the subtlest level that america is THE DEVIL INCARNATE. i just said in simple terms that an islamic backlash and a financial crash were probably on the cards for a long time. america took the blessed mantle from the european colonial powers when it came to 'catering to interests', to put it politely, in areas of acute geopolitical significance. not just the middle east, but the south americas and far-east asian theatres, too. just as europeans were hated in various parts of the globe throughout the last few centuries, so you'll likely find many an angry xenophobe or hate-filled fundamentalist in certain corners of the world today spouting anti-americanism. i really have no idea why you deign to post 3 paragraphs of condescending "for a literature genius" tripe. that's two posts in a row now when you've spat on my cock and then hopped right on top, big boy. i'm not talking to you. go post your notepad.exe thought-experiments alone, in silence.

how you go off on a three-paragraph rant and end up talking about einstein and exiled jews contributing to science is beyond me. it comes across as slightly mentally imbalanced.

Last edited by aynrandroolz (2012-12-31 16:21:03)

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6356|eXtreme to the maX

rdx-fx wrote:

Oh, and the British Mandate of Palestine in 1917, the founding of a homeland for European Jews displaced by pogroms in Europe, the European Holocaust, and making the state of Israel.
You're wildly misinterpreting what happened, in terms of the aims of Zionism, British intention and what happened on the ground.

Britain essentially caved in to Zionist demands and aspirations, there were no active pogroms and hadn't been for decades, no-one was displaced, even the Zionists didn't claim that - try reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ben-Gurion
Fairly obviously 1917 predates WW2.......

The intention was to allow some jews to migrate to their former homeland, not to create a new apartheid state by displacing the Palestinians from theirs.

As far as the collapse of respect for the US in the international arena goes, facilitating the creation of Israel would be it in Middle Eastern eyes.
Fuck Israel
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5724|Ventura, California
I had no idea aynrandroolz was Uzique.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
rdx-fx
...
+955|6842

aynrandroolz wrote:

american delusion. to call the iraq-afghan wars a 'third world war' shows just how inflated america's sense of conflict (and by extension, importance) really is. 


  9/11 was not an 'unprovoked' attack. it was america finally, after nearly half a century of neo-imperialist rule and foreign-policy intereference, finally reaping what it had sowed.  an elementary education in middle-east history and in 1980's->2000's economic policy will show you clearly enough why america was to become the single greatest locus for islamic hatred.
Here are your words.

In the first snippet, you do not call out ATG specifically, only "American delusion", and our supposed 'inflated sense of importance'.

In the second snippet, you exaggerate the role of the US in the Middle East's problems, while completely ignoring your own country's centuries of unbridled imperialism and exploitation of the world. Then you have the gall to snidely deride ATG, implying he lacks even the most 'elementary education in middle-east' history. For an educated man, you are grossly ignorant of middle eastern history, if you don't include European colonialism & imperialism in your reasoning for middle eastern hatred for the West and the US.

I have not 'shat bricks' - you post some rant from atop your high horse, getting key details wrong in your vain rush to heap insult on your usual suspects. I respond with detail and rebuttal to your spewing of overly vague bullshit and venomous spittle.

If you do not like my responses, then I suggest you crawl back under whichever rock you've been inhabiting lately.
(Or, if that language is too dense for you to parse; In American English, "Fuck Off")

"continually talk of inflation". Seriously, are you fucking high? YOU mentioned inflation in your rant at ATG, I responded to your 'continual' hyperbole. Again YOU paint with a too-wide brush, again I call you on it.

Other than your misstep about "continually talk of inflation", your revised assessment of why the Islamists hate the US is reasonable. You still ignore European & English colonialism/imperialism as the founding factors for the Middle East's current unrest and ingrained distrust of the West.

Your petty imaginings of my 'mental imbalance', Freudian inclusion of your cock, and other rambling insults sound more like you're on another cocaine fueled mania, dear little Uzi-que.
rdx-fx
...
+955|6842
In simplest terms, Uzique, I respect your wit & intelligence, but your titanic ego needs to go find an iceberg to sink itself on.

You've got standing disagreements with Jay, ATG, and others "and imma let you finish", but at least try to get your background details right. You come in implying that the US deserved 9/11, or that the US military is a 'welfare gravy train', of course someone from the US is going to throw a flag on that.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5836

The feared fiscal cliff was at hand Monday night, with nothing expected to pass Congress before a combination of tax increases and spending cuts starts to kick in at midnight.

A deal to avert that combination, which economists warn could push the U.S. economy back into recession, was "within sight" on Monday afternoon, President Barack Obama said. And in the Senate, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told members that they were "very, very close" to a deal, having worked out an agreement on taxes.

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, said senators "are hoping to vote tonight" on some package to avert the cliff. But the House of Representatives adjourned without voting on anything Monday -- and Obama's remarks earlier Monday, in which he chided Congress and warned that battles over spending still loomed, hit a nerve among several Republicans in the Senate.

"They are close, but they're not there yet," Obama said. "And one thing we can count on with respect to this Congress is that if there is even one second left before you have to do what you're supposed to do, they will use that last second."

Obama said the deal now on the table would prevent a tax increase for the overwhelming majority of Americans, extend the child tax and tuition credits for families as well as those for clean-energy companies, and extend unemployment benefits for 2 million people. But even then, he said lawmakers still have to figure out how to mitigate the possible damage from sharp spending cuts that are scheduled to start biting January 2, when the federal government reopens after the New Year's holiday.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/31/politics/ … ?hpt=hp_t1
ಠ_ಠ       (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Congressional budget office predicts a recession. We have been out of recession since Spring '09.

I blame our current political conditions on the financial situation. Despite the Iraq war push back our government managed to operate orderly enough. I am not blaming any one party or group for this. I am supportive of both Bush and Obama.

But others think the finance crisis may in part be Bush's fault.
In an article in Sunday’s Washington Post, former Clinton-era economic adviser Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard University public policy lecturer Linda J. Bilmes say that the Iraq war forced the US to take on more debt than it had to, and caused in part the rising oil prices that resulted in large amounts of money flowing out of the US economy.

To counter the effects of those trends, fiscal policy makers had to keep interest rates unnaturally low, causing the securities and real estate bubbles that burst at the start of the recession, the authors say.

The authors also amended their assessment from several years ago that the Iraq war’s true cost is around $3 trillion, saying new information suggests that the cost goes “beyond” that estimate.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 02200.html
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5609|London, England
We've been back in a recession since September
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6356|eXtreme to the maX
Cutting taxes and borrowing to fund a pointless war wasn't exactly a piece of fiscal genius.
Fuck Israel
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4505
rdx

the usa did 'deserve' 9/11, in a historical sense, inasmuch as innocent civilians can ever 'deserve' to be murdered, i.e. it was unjust and criminal, but historically... consequential... shall we say. the wheels had been set in motion on that for a long time; it had a certain inevitability about it (even if the actual event was more monstrous than any could have imagined). you are picking up on a perceived 'anti-americanism' where there is none. you complain that i'm not talking about european colonialism and getting into yet another usa vs. europe 'who is the best' discussion... the topic is "what event marks the end of the post cold war american prosperity", and as such my didactic remarks to "check recent history" are all ABOUT this topic. i wasn't even thinking about europe and its involvement in the middle-east during my post because the discussion wasn't even about that. this is not a usa vs. europe pissing contest, i repeat. so do you want me to disclaim every single post i make that points out 'less savory' chapters in us history with 1,000 word tangents and historical background expositions? why would i talk about the english creation of palestine in a topic - and more specifically in a context with shifty and atg - that is about the 9/11 attacks? yes, you could argue in some sense that all of the last 2-3 centuries' history has created an ambient 'white noise' of anti-western sentiment in middle-eastern history. but, for fuck's sake, do you want me to go into the motives of pope urban the second for the first crusade, too, whilst we're at explaining the middle-east versus west thing? christ (no pun intended). all i said was that 9/11 was the result of so-and-so many decades of american neo-imperialism, and the financial crash was a result of such-and-such decade's fiscal policy (and general credit-consumerist culture that went along with it). at no point did my post infer that the european colonies never existed, or that america was in any way the new and ONLY rex romana.

like i said in the first place, you're using minor posts that detail very specific points to very specific posters as an excuse to jump on my dick. it's boring. no i am not going to type 3-4 paragraphs of hand-wringing relativist liberal guilt filler every time i want to critique a certain period of any certain nation's history. yes, we all bear collective guilt. yes, all countries have done bad stuff and got involved in naughty things. this thread is about america's supposed 'decline'. i think the last 30-40 years of american economic and foreign policy are a good focus for discussions. sorry i'm not safeguarding everything i say with a mention of the belgian congo or something, to keep your jingoism from boiling over with seething rage. for the sake of simplicity i think it's enough to prescribe shifty some basic reading in late-20th century american history, first and foremost. i'm not exactly denying the european age of empire in that remark.

all this stuff about 'my ego' and 'great literary scholar' is just bizarre. i am not going to waste my time hand-wringing pointing out old europe's bloody deeds and parallelisms. check the topic, and more specifically check who the fuck i'm quoting in context before you jump off on yet another one of your free-associative 10-paragraph lectures. the two things you pick out are "the usa deserved it", and "military is a gravytrain". my posts were fairly simple and straightforward, so to recapitulate:

1) the usa did 'deserve' an islamic attack, although deserve is an unwieldy word in this sense. more like there was a history of anti-american sentiment directly as a result of us involvement in the middle east, and lots of malfeasance and general meddling around, to gloss over it rather simplistically. the fact your intelligence services had first trained the threat, and then later made reports and flagged up concern about same-factions posing a new threat to homeland security... suggests that, yes, 9/11 was a matter of direct historical consequentiality.

2) jay's particular life path does involve cynically using the military's financial schemes as a 'gravytrain' and free ride through college funding. never once did my post even remotely suggest that all soldiers are on the gravytrain. never once did i make it some anti-military anti-us inane rant. very specifically highlighting jay's continued and shining cognitive dissonance. my cousin 2 months ago finally got into the royal marines, and has spent his festive season on a freezing mountain somewhere, catching hypothermia and being hospitalized. i respect military service, even if it's not for me. the 'gravytrain' comment is specifically about jay's principles: hating on welfare handouts whilst sailing through college via the path of least financial resistance... even if that involves going into a warzone to fight in a conflict he didn't believe in. VERY different to what you got so angry over (i.e. nothing).

Last edited by aynrandroolz (2012-12-31 19:13:02)

A2TG2
Hazbeen
+67|4775|at your six

aynrandroolz wrote:

A2TG2 wrote:

9/11

That was an event perpetrated by globalist to unleash a third world war that we are now in the middle of.
american delusion. to call the iraq-afghan wars a 'third world war' shows just how inflated america's sense of conflict (and by extension, importance) really is. it is also a gross disrespect to those who served and died in the first two world wars to insist that a little romp around the desert against a bunch of tribal goatlords is anything near the deployment and devastation of a 'third world war'. or as if anything near as much is at stake (cries of neo-con "freedom" in today's case are merely propagandist and fear-mongering - arguably so in the first two world wars, too, if you're adopting the position of a cynic; but real territory and real power was at stake). this isn't even another vietnam, and vietnam was far from a fuckin' world war. feel free to call it that though to over-inflate the crisis and thus assuage your humiliation-in-failure. this is america trying to play toy empire in the sandbowl and failing, miserably, is all. 'the coalition' was more like a farcical neo-imperialist world police nee naw'ing onto the scene after a made-for-tv terrorist disaster; hardly the allies vs. the axis. the 'axis of evil' here - much like in the cold war - is largely imaginary and phantasmal in its threat. if there's anything that the expensive and painfully protracted "war on terror" has taught us over the last decade, it's that the "global terror network" is mostly a collective fiction... one penned ironically enough by CIA black propaganda, decades previous. you bought into your own self-concocted nightmare.

shifty, america's twin-blow (in domestic market and in world security) were both ticking time-bombs. it wasn't as if one day, suddenly and spontaneously, everything just unraveled. 9/11 was not an 'unprovoked' attack. it was america finally, after nearly half a century of neo-imperialist rule and foreign-policy intereference, finally reaping what it had sowed. ditto the financial crash. an elementary education in middle-east history and in 1980's->2000's economic policy will show you clearly enough why america was to become the single greatest locus for islamic hatred, and why a huge financial sector bubble was long due a prickly pinned pop-cum-detonation.
We have troops in 35 African countries, Libya, Eqypt, Tunisia, Pakistan, Warziristan...the list is long. These are all countries we have swept away. Our drone army is unstoppable and you are all subjects of the neo-con empire.
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4505
you may have troops in african countries, but china has contractors. it is clear who is playing the long game, and who is going to win.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7022|PNW

What event marks the end of the Post Cold war American prosperity?
We're falling over the edge of the fiscal cliff into a putrid vat of smelly catchphrases and slogans, but if you want my opinion:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6356|eXtreme to the maX
I wouldn't really say Libya, Pakistan, Egypt have exactly been swept away, in Libya and Egypt West-friendly dictators have been replaced with West-unfriendly Islamics in revolutions in part run by Al Qaeda, Pakistan is now on the brink of falling to the Islamics.

9/11 Was expected payback for all the Arabs slaughtered and dispossessed - with unwavering US backing - by Israel over the last 60+ years to the present day.

If we're going to continue to bring up British malfeasance in the region 100-200 years after the event how much longer do we suppose the Arabs are going to hate America for?
The Jews continue to play the Holocaust card, there's at least another 60-100 years of aggrieved unrest ahead in the Arab world.

9/11 and the wave of pro-Islamic revolutions are the beginning of a seismic change.
Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5609|London, England

aynrandroolz wrote:

2) jay's particular life path does involve cynically using the military's financial schemes as a 'gravytrain' and free ride through college funding. never once did my post even remotely suggest that all soldiers are on the gravytrain. never once did i make it some anti-military anti-us inane rant. very specifically highlighting jay's continued and shining cognitive dissonance. my cousin 2 months ago finally got into the royal marines, and has spent his festive season on a freezing mountain somewhere, catching hypothermia and being hospitalized. i respect military service, even if it's not for me. the 'gravytrain' comment is specifically about jay's principles: hating on welfare handouts whilst sailing through college via the path of least financial resistance... even if that involves going into a warzone to fight in a conflict he didn't believe in. VERY different to what you got so angry over (i.e. nothing).
By your definition, anyone who works for a wage is on some form of gravytrain. Who has the cognitive dissonance? You're so bent on trying to insult me, and you've latched onto my military service so hard, that you keep trying to stretch it to turn it into a negative. It's hilarious. I worked 60 hours a week most weeks, even when I was on a CONUS post. I wasn't exactly living it up on my $1800/mo pay either. Keep digging though, you made me laugh even through my massive new year's hangover!
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6356|eXtreme to the maX

Jay wrote:

aynrandroolz wrote:

2) jay's particular life path does involve cynically using the military's financial schemes as a 'gravytrain' and free ride through college funding. never once did my post even remotely suggest that all soldiers are on the gravytrain. never once did i make it some anti-military anti-us inane rant. very specifically highlighting jay's continued and shining cognitive dissonance. my cousin 2 months ago finally got into the royal marines, and has spent his festive season on a freezing mountain somewhere, catching hypothermia and being hospitalized. i respect military service, even if it's not for me. the 'gravytrain' comment is specifically about jay's principles: hating on welfare handouts whilst sailing through college via the path of least financial resistance... even if that involves going into a warzone to fight in a conflict he didn't believe in. VERY different to what you got so angry over (i.e. nothing).
By your definition, anyone who works for a wage is on some form of gravytrain. Who has the cognitive dissonance? You're so bent on trying to insult me, and you've latched onto my military service so hard, that you keep trying to stretch it to turn it into a negative. It's hilarious. I worked 60 hours a week most weeks, even when I was on a CONUS post. I wasn't exactly living it up on my $1800/mo pay either. Keep digging though, you made me laugh even through my massive new year's hangover!
Guys, you're both equally insecure about your life/career choices - I don't understand why you don't get along.
Fuck Israel
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|6943
I think 9/11 and the 20-zeros will go down in history as the beginning of the end.
Uzique The Lesser
Banned
+382|4505
nope.gif, i'm perfectly happy and secure in mine, and i didn't have to do any morally bankrupt or overly cynical ploys to get there, or in order to get funding. in fact, i'm having money thrown at me to do what i love. not quite the same as jay, bouncing around three college courses for the better part of a decade and then settling on a government welfare scheme. let me know when i'm in my mid-30's, living at home, sniping people's lifestyle choices, though. that'll be a different ballgame, indeed. a very different ballgame.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6356|eXtreme to the maX

aynrandroolz wrote:

let me know when i'm in my mid-30's, sniping people's lifestyle choices.
You're in your mid 20s, living off handouts, sniping at people's lifestyle choices.

When you're in your mid-30's, teaching twaddle to snotbags at a second-rate public school for a pittance and still sniping at the lifestyle choices of people more dynamic and successful than you, then we'll see.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2013-01-01 15:52:42)

Fuck Israel
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5429|Sydney

Karbin wrote:

I dont see just one "Thing" but 3.
9/11
Katrina
Iraq
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5724|Ventura, California
I'm trying to see how Katrina aided to end American prosperity. I know little of New Orleans but if I recall correctly it is an important shipping port. If that's the case I don't see why it wouldn't have just been rebuilt and business continued as usual.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6356|eXtreme to the maX
It didn't aid the end, it was an event which marked the realisation that America couldn't look after Americans.
Fuck Israel
-Sh1fty-
plundering yee booty
+510|5724|Ventura, California
It's not that we can't it's that we won't. Katrina was marked with looting, violence, and really poor organization. A combination of human scum and poor leadership turned it into a mess.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard