Well I'm watching it, I thought the previous Star Trek movie was alright.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
?UnkleRukus wrote:
I thought Star Trek was against your religion.
Better than a teaser that spoils the entire movie.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
The fuck, they didn't show any ships shooting at each other. And great, another teaser that still doesn't explain what the movie's about.
Star Trek = CommunismUnkleRukus wrote:
I thought Star Trek was against your religion.
Bad guy wants to destroy Federation, Captain of the Enterprise has to stop him.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
The fuck, they didn't show any ships shooting at each other. And great, another teaser that still doesn't explain what the movie's about.
I was hoping they'd simply fix the time fuckup from Star Trek 11. Because, you know, time travel, right? Or aren't the lives of an entire planet worth it?Spidery_Yoda wrote:
Bad guy wants to destroy Federation, Captain of the Enterprise has to stop him.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
The fuck, they didn't show any ships shooting at each other. And great, another teaser that still doesn't explain what the movie's about.
Sadly the plot of most Star Trek films. Including the previous 2.
Mutantbear wrote:
our culture is going to shit because hollywood doesnt make original movies
wat
Sequels have officially ruined pop cultureMutantbear wrote:
our culture is going to shit because hollywood doesnt make original movies
wat
Marxism.Dilbert_X wrote:
Star Trek = CommunismUnkleRukus wrote:
I thought Star Trek was against your religion.
Think about it.
Which of the previous movies really required foreknowledge of the Star Trek universe?Macbeth wrote:
Never liked Star Trek. Am looking forward to this movie though. They were smart to make the first one in the reboot series not require a foreknowledge of the star trek universe. Selling the movie on its own merit as opposed to selling the previous movies on the tv show's. Good stuff.