Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6250|...
The US "took the lead" because of WW2, end of story. In the aftermath of the war it was the only participant nation that was almost completely unaffected by the conflict. Most of the other (previously world-leading) nations had both their infrastructure and economy destroyed and endured pretty significant reductions of their (working) populations.
inane little opines
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6357|eXtreme to the maX
I wouldn't say they had a technical lead at the end of WW2, the Germans, and even the British, were way ahead in many areas, and I can't think of an area where they were behind the US. Maybe high altitude long-range bombers, thats about it, but then the Germans had them years before - they just didn't use them.

The US had a huge population and huge production capacity, and the advantage of both being remote from the battlefield.
That and total security of energy (oil) supply, but nothing else.

Yes someone will say the A-Bomb, but the Germans were well down that track and the A-Bomb wasn't even a war winner.
Fuck Israel
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6967

Shocking wrote:

The US "took the lead" because of WW2, end of story. In the aftermath of the war it was the only participant nation that was almost completely unaffected by the conflict. Most of the other (previously world-leading) nations had both their infrastructure and economy destroyed and endured pretty significant reductions of their (working) populations.
Some kid in my East Asian enterprise class said US cars sold so well in the 1950s because of American ingenuity and patriotism. He kinda forgot to mention the only other two countries that can make a car worth a shit (Japan and Germany) was pretty much occupied and had their industries bombed to shit.

The 1950s were the American "golden economic age" because they had 0 competition and didn't have to rebuild their economy.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6357|eXtreme to the maX
How did this thread evolve into this awesomeness?
Fuck Israel
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6250|...
The Germans were far from creating an a-bomb. Their theories on making one were completely wrong (apparently), they would've required absolutely massive amounts of uranium. The US facilitated the necessities to create one. As for who invented it - that was a combined effort of scientists from many different nations. A Frenchman first proposed the idea though.

In engineering ze germans were ahead of everyone else in pretty much everything. Almost every single piece of military equipment they had was 'better' than allied counterparts.

Last edited by Shocking (2012-09-09 05:19:10)

inane little opines
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6357|eXtreme to the maX
Well, I was talking about technology, not simply their equipment was 'better'.
They were ahead in jet engines - they had jet combat aircraft before Britain had given the US a sample of the Whittle engine - and about a decade ahead in rockets.

Technologically they were unmatched, not so in production capacity, its just lucky Hitler was a terrible tactician and didn't understand how to use a technological advantage to his advantage - instead he pretty well threw them all away.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2012-09-09 06:39:41)

Fuck Israel
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6967
One thing americans are really good at is bringing the greatest and brightest to immigrate to their country, and they know how to commercialize products. The germans invented the car, the Americans sold it.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6250|...

Dilbert_X wrote:

Well, I was talking about technology, not simply their equipment was 'better'.
They were ahead in jet engines - they had jet combat aircraft before Britain had given the US a sample of the Whittle engine - and about a decade ahead in rockets.

Technologically they were unmatched, not so in production capacity, its just lucky Hitler was a terrible tactician and didn't understand how to use a technological advantage to his advantage - instead he pretty well threw them all away.
True. The panzer maus project, railroad cannons etc - while these are some pretty cool things they hogged resources and manpower without them being of any significant value.
inane little opines
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6357|eXtreme to the maX
The main reason the Germans technology projects were of no significant value was Hitler messed with them so badly, he either cancelled them just when they were about to deliver, having sunk 99% of the costs, demanded cradical concept changes, or just misdeployed them.
Fuck Israel
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|6961|Oklahoma City

Dilbert_X wrote:

Except......

In the 1940s America didn't have a technical lead over anyone.
America was the Apple of the technology world. We didn't always invent everything first, but we saw practical uses for inventions and jumpstarted their popularity. (Then we usually claimed we invented it, as we added rounded corners.)

Radio waves were predicted by a Scottish scientist in the 1860s, but in 1866 an American dentist displayed the first wireless telegraphy and aerial wireless communication. This was 20 years before Hertz (German) demonstrated the first radio wave frequencies. An Italian is credited with proving this could be used to send and receive messages in 1902. But in 1899, the US army already had wireless communication with ships. In 1901, Hawaii had a radiotelegraph service installed to communicate between the islands. In 1904, the vacuum tube was invented in Britain (a diode tube). In 1906, Lee De Forest (an American) invented the triode vacuum tube, allowing a radio system to be capable of carrying voice. In 1907, De Forest invented the Audion vacuum tube, which was used in almost everything electronic until the transistor was invented in 1947. De Forest also invented the AM radio.


Other American Inventions:

1901:
The vacuum cleaner
Instant Coffee (Japanese American, in America)

1902:
The Air Conditioner

1903:
First gas motored manned aircraft
Bottle making machinery
The Tractor
Windshield Wipers

1906:
Sonar

1907:
First synthetic plastic (By a Belgium-American, in America)

1910:
First talking motion picture

1911:
Electrical ignition system for cars

1912:
Motorized movie cameras

1913:
The bra

1914:
Gas mask

1915:
Pyrex

1918:
The superheterodyne radio circuit

1920:
Tommy gun
Band-Aids

1923:
Frozen Food

1924:
Moving coil loudspeaker

1926:
Liquid fueled rockets

1927:
Electronic television system
Technicolor
The iron lung

1928:
Electric Razor

1929:
Car radio

1930:
Scotch tape
Neoprene
Differential analyzer (analog computer)

1931:
Stop motion photography

1932:
Polaroid instant photographs
Parking meter
Radio Telescope

1933:
FM Radio
Drive-In Movie theater

1935:
Nylon
Canned beer

1936:
Voice recognition machine
Colt revolver

1937:
Photocopier

1938:
Teflon

1940:
Color television
The Jeep
Ameripol (synthetic rubber)

1942:
Nuclear reactor (Led by an Italian-American in Chicago)
Electronic Digital computer

1943:
Plastic putty (Silly putty)

1944:
Synthetic cortisone

1945:
Hypertext
Atomic bomb (Numerous countries of origin involved, invented in America)

1946:
Microwave oven

1947:
Mobile telephone
Transistor
Tupperware seal



Considering the number of revolutionary, technological advancements on this list, and the number that made world-wide impact and are still in use today, I have to say I disagree with your assessment that "In the 1940s America didn't have a technical lead over anyone."
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6357|eXtreme to the maX
Yes, I can see the huge military advantage the bra would have given US forces over the Wermacht, but I'm pretty sure the Germans had silly-putty or its equivalent.
Fuck Israel
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|6961|Oklahoma City
Oh, I am sorry, was your quote "The Americans did not have a military technology advantage over anyone" ? Cause that is not what you said.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6967

HITNRUNXX wrote:

Oh, I am sorry, was your quote "The Americans did not have a military technology advantage over anyone" ? Cause that is not what you said.
Context context context. The whole discussion was on WW2 and technologies involved.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|6961|Oklahoma City
It looked to me like the conversation was on whether or not the US was a superpower before WWII. Military is not the only factor in deciding a superpower.
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|6961|Oklahoma City
To save you from going back a page:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

America didn't get to be the world's superpower by the 1940s through socialism, communism, etc. Free enterprise is a damn good thing.

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

No, they got to be a superpower in the 40's (don't forget about the British Empire and the Soviet Union) through centralization, fear-mongering and an atrocious amount of spending. The dissolution of the Soviet Union broke the spell and more Americans began to wonder WTF we were doing.

RAIMIUS wrote:

Yeah, nothing to do with massive industrial capability, being a leader in technology, and having a society that encouraged business and innovation....


Really dude?

Dilbert_X wrote:

Except......

In the 1940s America didn't have a technical lead over anyone.

In wartime - America, like most countries, reverted to a socialist model, with central govt taking decisions from the centre and the people becoming subjects, not citizens.

Or explain how a military draft fits with a free-market democracy.
So I disagree with your context statement, Cybargs... The discussion was NOT on WW2 or the military until after Dilbert's statement, except a line about how the military was government run.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6357|eXtreme to the maX
Either way America didn't have any kind of lead, the war spurred the country to catch-up, overtake and maintain a lead.

Thats a funny list, did Pace write it?
1936: Colt revolver
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Colt

Americans - So smart they can invent things 101 years after they've been invented and they've been dead 74 years?

I'm not bothering with the rest of the list, except to say Americans have a curious definition of invention which has never squared with their 'first to invent' patent system.
Fuck Israel
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6967
hurr durr america took lead because free enterprise. yeah FDR wasn't a fan of big government at all
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7023|PNW

I think police should be required by law to give you a lollipop after a stop-and-frisk.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6967
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|6961|Oklahoma City

Dilbert_X wrote:

Either way America didn't have any kind of lead, the war spurred the country to catch-up, overtake and maintain a lead.

1936: Colt revolver
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Colt

Americans - So smart they can invent things 101 years after they've been invented and they've been dead 74 years?
My mistake on that one sorry, had list 40 web pages open looking at inventions, and went in and looked at each one, but missed that one. Not sure what it was supposed to be.

Still disagree with you on the US not having a technological lead. You have no basis for that at all. Of numerous "greatest inventions" sites that target the early 1900s, the US has the vast majority of listings. Britain has a large number, then Germany starts taking off as WWII approaches.

Not really sure where your justification for your claims stand.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5837

What does any of this have to do with stop and frisk?
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6357|eXtreme to the maX

HITNRUNXX wrote:

Still disagree with you on the US not having a technological lead. You have no basis for that at all. Of numerous "greatest inventions" sites that target the early 1900s, the US has the vast majority of listings. Britain has a large number, then Germany starts taking off as WWII approaches.

Not really sure where your justification for your claims stand.
Not sure where your justification for saying America had a lead stands, Americans patent anything and everything. It wouldn't occur to most people to bother patenting something like a bra, numbers of patents isn't the be-all and end-all.

At the outbreak of WW2 America had no military technological advantage in any area, and was a long way behind in many - aero-engines and radar being two examples which spring to mind.
Fuck Israel
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|6961|Oklahoma City
So of all the countries in the world, the US had no technological leads in any area, were not a superpower, and your reasoning is that because they were not in the middle of a war and did not dump all their money into military tech, then that excludes them from having any tech advantages. Got it. We should dump 100% of our money into military from here on so we can be considered to have a tech advantage.

And there were a number of things that are accredited to "US" inventions that I left off the list because they were actually invented elsewhere, and just patented over here. There were also a number of things I left of that list because they were slightly improved upon... Such as aerosol sprays, which have no less than 5 dates and groups of people that invented them.

As for radar, the US were playing with it to track boats as early as 1922. In 1934, in the US, there was the full pulsed system, and were able to use it to locate planes. The British were the first to fully use it as an air defense system... Does that mean the US couldn't? No, it means the US were not expecting planes to attack them at that point, so why would they? England had a massive threat and they implemented something to deal with it. That doesn't mean they were technologically superior in every way... It means they had a need, and that need got priority.

Jets they were behind on. They had some really nice battleships though... Since, you know, if the US were going to get involved in the war they were going to have to travel over water to actually get to the battle... I suppose we could have built jets and then just parked them in our own country with nowhere to go.

I think you are confusing technology advancements with military needs. Military alone does not a superpower make.

By the way, I never said America had an overall lead, but YOU said they had NO technological lead on ANYONE. A totally ridiculous statement.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6357|eXtreme to the maX
At the start of the war, say 1939, America was technologically behind the other protagonists, there's no real argument about it.
It was nothing to do with being in a war or not.
Fuck Israel
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|6961|Oklahoma City
Yet according to almost every book on the history of the United States, they are listed as being a superpower by about 1900... Technological, Agricultural, and Industrial are consistently listed as the main reasons why. So yes you are right, there is no real argument about it.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard