Because I responding to you that my old response was to certain people, oh and I'll pass on the shut up and get out.Jaekus wrote:
Why quote my post then?War Man wrote:
It was a response to certain people here(see link as an example).
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 3#p3828863
Edit: Now shut the fuck up
Oh yeah, it's because you have the logical application of an ape.
Now shut the fuck up and get the fuck out, the grown ups are talking.
I honestly and truly believe you suffer from some form of mental deficiency.War Man wrote:
Because I responding to you that my old response was to certain people, oh and I'll pass on the shut up and get out.Jaekus wrote:
Why quote my post then?War Man wrote:
It was a response to certain people here(see link as an example).
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 3#p3828863
Edit: Now shut the fuck up
Oh yeah, it's because you have the logical application of an ape.
Now shut the fuck up and get the fuck out, the grown ups are talking.
13urnzz wrote:
no. you shut the fuck up. you do not have the logistics to shut down intelligent people, or the means to advance your inbred, narrow-minded talking point. The majority of this forum and indeed the world does not agree with your home schooled, bucolic outlook on reality. begone to your parents' 18th century world view and comment on the 21st century no more.War Man wrote:
Edit: Now shut the fuck up
Last edited by Jaekus (2012-08-25 20:32:03)
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p3819570Jaekus wrote:
I honestly and truly believe you suffer from some form of mental deficiency.War Man wrote:
Because I responding to you that my old response was to certain people, oh and I'll pass on the shut up and get out.Jaekus wrote:
Why quote my post then?
Oh yeah, it's because you have the logical application of an ape.
Now shut the fuck up and get the fuck out, the grown ups are talking.
But you actually thought it was legit immediately after seeing it and decided to post it.Jaekus wrote:
I'm not sure why that's funny. I don't spend my life on 4chan and reddit like everyone else, it just popped up on facebook and I found it amusing.
I also don't quote other people, make an unrelated point and then say I was addressing someone else anyway and somehow think this is a legit way to handle a discussion.
Last edited by Jaekus (2012-08-25 18:57:56)
A zygote =/= a baby.Stingray24 wrote:
Yet someone said to be so severely lacking managed to embarrass you. Now back to more justification for killing babies.
Stingray, why ask for 'more justification' when your mind is clearly made up? if it is your honest intention to have civil discourse on the matter, i would first refer you to someone you know more qualified to speak about carrying a child to term, someone you know and opinion you trust, and ask her if she would bear a rapists' child or her father's child - then come back and have a level headed conversation without your talking points.AussieReaper wrote:
A zygote =/= a baby.Stingray24 wrote:
Yet someone said to be so severely lacking managed to embarrass you. Now back to more justification for killing babies.
Idiot.
i have spoken to a women who was a victim of rape. that woman is my wife. she chose to have an abortion, and since we have been married, we have not been able to conceive a child.Stingray24 wrote:
Using the word fuck doesn't lend more credence to your position, nor does it represent the civility you desire. My statement was a description of the thread up to this point.
Guess you aren't allowed to participate in the discussion either, since you haven't personally spoken to a woman who did chose to carry a rapist's child to term. Why ask for anecdotal evidence, which you will dismiss, when your mind is made up?
No, I simply disagree with you. Maybe you guys can try posting without calling names and it'd represent your views more effectively. If you don't value human life at it's beginning, fine. I do. No matter what perspective I provide to explain why I hold that position, it's unlikely to change your position. Especially if you can't get beyond thinking those who hold views that don't match yours are stupid. But if you'd like to pull the discourse up a couple notches in civility, I'd be glad to explain.AussieReaper wrote:
A zygote =/= a baby.Stingray24 wrote:
Yet someone said to be so severely lacking managed to embarrass you. Now back to more justification for killing babies.
Idiot.
you obviously are confusing the term 'fuck off' with calling a person a name, and nice sidestep of the issue.Stingray24 wrote:
Maybe you guys can try posting without calling names and it'd represent your views more effectively.
Simple question. Do you consider a zygote a baby?Stingray24 wrote:
No, I simply disagree with you. Maybe you guys can try posting without calling names and it'd represent your views more effectively. If you don't value human life at it's beginning, fine. I do. No matter what perspective I provide to explain why I hold that position, it's unlikely to change your position. Especially if you can't get beyond thinking those who hold views that don't match yours are stupid. But if you'd like to pull the discourse up a couple notches in civility, I'd be glad to explain.AussieReaper wrote:
A zygote =/= a baby.Stingray24 wrote:
Yet someone said to be so severely lacking managed to embarrass you. Now back to more justification for killing babies.
Idiot.
you called him a name he wont debate youAussieReaper wrote:
Simple question. Do you consider a zygote a baby?Stingray24 wrote:
No, I simply disagree with you. Maybe you guys can try posting without calling names and it'd represent your views more effectively. If you don't value human life at it's beginning, fine. I do. No matter what perspective I provide to explain why I hold that position, it's unlikely to change your position. Especially if you can't get beyond thinking those who hold views that don't match yours are stupid. But if you'd like to pull the discourse up a couple notches in civility, I'd be glad to explain.AussieReaper wrote:
A zygote =/= a baby.
Idiot.
Care to explain why/why not?
Stingray24 wrote:
@ burnzz and aussie
I'll be glad to re-state what I've posted in other thread on the subject, but you'll have to wait til tomorrow.
uh, i got served when jsnipy closed the thread. turns out, that my being a man, am no authority on abortion. save your precious keystrokes Stingray for your fellow men that will debate you on the subject, and show them the mater-debator that you are!burnzz's wife wrote:
"why are you even giving those fools the time of day? let me guess, you're argueing abortion with guys? really? ask them what woman, oh nevermind. no woman is going to argue abortion. her mind is made up, even if she tells men that she is wrestling with it in her own mind."
It's not in my mind...it's based on posts in this thread. Hence the quotation marks.AussieReaper wrote:
I like how in your mind having an abortion based on a birth defect means that the parent thinks the child is a freak.
That's an honest, objective assessment of the parents point of view.
You've created a straw man argument by giving those who disagree with you the most extreme position imaginable with giving them a "Kid's not perfect. Totally OK to abort it." attitude and then jump onto your soap box about how they shouldn't be so denigrating.