(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7069|Grapevine, TX
Obviously Im a Conservative, and I did serve my country. I just thought that some of you would appreciate this.

     Bill Clinton registers for the draft on September 08, 1964, accepting all contractual conditions of registering for the draft.
     
    Selective Service Number 326 46 228. Bill Clinton classified 2-S on November 17, 1964.

    Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on March 20, 1968.

    Bill Clinton ordered to report for induction on July 28,  1969.

    Bill Clinton refuses to report and is not inducted into the military.




    Bill Clinton reclassified 1-D after enlisting in the United States Army Reserves on August 07, 1969, under authority of Col. E. Holmes.
    Clinton signs enlistment papers and takes oath of enlistment.

    Bill Clinton fails to report to his duty station at the University of  Arkansas ROTC, September 1969.

    Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on October 30, 1969, as enlistment with Army
    Reserves is revoked by Colonel E. Holmes and Clinton now AWOL and subject to arrest under Public Law 90-40 (2)(a) a registrant who has failed to report... remains liable for induction.

    Bill Clinton's birth date lottery number is 311, drawn December 1, 1969, but anyone who has already been ordered to report for induction is INELIGIBLE!
     

    Bill Clinton runs for Congress (1974), while a fugitive from justice under Public Law 90-40.

    Bill Clinton runs for Arkansas Attorney General (1976), while a fugitive from justice.

    Bill Clinton receives pardon on January 21,1977, from President Carter.

    Bill Clinton is the FIRST PARDONED FEDERAL FELON ever to serve as President of  the United States.
     

     


    All these facts come from Freedom of Information requests, public laws, and various books that have been published, and have not been refuted by Clinton.

     
    After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

    After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

    After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.



    After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

    After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
     
    Maybe if Clinton had kept those promises, an estimated  3,000 people in New York and Washington, DC that are  now dead would be alive today.
     

    AN INTERESTING QUESTION:
     
    This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show.  Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question.
     
    There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap software and gives billions of dollars to charity.

    The other sponsors terrorism. That being the case, why was it that the Clinton Administration spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the eight years in office, than Osama bin Laden?
     

     


    THINK ABOUT IT!
     
    It is a strange turn of events.  Hillary gets $8 Million for her forth coming memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to be written.
     
    This from two people who spent 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events while under oath.
     
    Sincerely,
     
    Cdr. Hamilton McWhorter USN  (ret)
Darth_Fleder
Mod from the Church of the Painful Truth
+533|7046|Orlando, FL - Age 43
Go get em tiger!
eMarine
Gorgonnash PVP
+119|7083|Sacramento, Cal
Did Bush go to Vietnam anyone??? And yes I'm republican.
Belx
Member
+4|6917|New York, New York
At least Clinton did not invade a country with faulty evidence.
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7069|Grapevine, TX
No, he didn't. Start your own thread if you want to start a new topic. Thanks.
Darth_Fleder
Mod from the Church of the Painful Truth
+533|7046|Orlando, FL - Age 43
No, but he did serve stateside and that one point does not invalidate the previous post.
Darth_Fleder
Mod from the Church of the Painful Truth
+533|7046|Orlando, FL - Age 43

Belx wrote:

At least Clinton did not invade a country with faulty evidence.
No, he invaded an intern and commited perjury in a court of law about it.
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|6873|USA

Belx wrote:

At least Clinton did not invade a country with faulty evidence.
SHUT DOWN! props for that one...yes, clinton is better at presidency than bush...known fact...
This is Bush's approval rating over his term

\
  \
    \
      \
        \
          \
            \
              >
Rakasan
Member
+7|7076|California, USA
Didn't Bush make some serious cutbacks for the VA Health Care System?
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|6873|USA
and spent like 3.3 trillion dollars
Snipedya14
Dont tread on me
+77|6934|Mountains of West Virginia

Darth_Fleder wrote:

Belx wrote:

At least Clinton did not invade a country with faulty evidence.
No, he invaded an intern and commited perjury in a court of law about it.
Oh, right, almost 2000 lives lost, but hey, Clinton had got some action with an intern!!!

Give me a break.



But I thought this was about Hillary Clinton bashing..you got my hopes up. Death to us all if she runs.
Darth_Fleder
Mod from the Church of the Painful Truth
+533|7046|Orlando, FL - Age 43

Naughty_Om wrote:

...yes, clinton is better at presidency than bush...known fact...
This is Bush's approval rating over his term
And you know this how??
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|6873|USA
lets see. invasion of Iraq. Social Security. wire tappings.

Clinton... kept up foreign relations...we actually had money....can speak clearly.

bush...speaks like a 3 year old.

clinton...he handled kosovo well, handled the attack the world trade center in 93 with ease and organization......

COME ON...JUST LOOK at the facts....


bill wont serve again...hillary wont ever get elected, but anyone is better than bush......

Last edited by Naughty_Om (2006-05-24 18:07:34)

Lib-Sl@yer
Member
+32|6952|Wherever the F**k i feel like
Actually if hilary clinton runs her campaing will be funded by the iranians, the chinese and the russians
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|6873|USA
if she runs....she will be crushed. i am voting in the next election and no way in hell am i voting for her in the primaries.... we need strong speaker who can smooth talk like clinton....
Marconius
One-eyed Wonder Mod
+368|6934|San Francisco
Promises, eh?  Perhaps you should go visit Mohammed Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Mahmud Abouhalima, Ahmad Ajaj and Ramzi Yousef.  The perpetrators of the '93 WTC attacks are all in jail for life, and much less can be said about the one possibly self-proclaimed mastermind of 9/11....

For each of those 'promises' you listed, retaliation was carried out and information was gathered.  Richard Clark was assigned to take down al Qaeda, and had a plan drafted after the USS Cole bombing.  Of course, the responsibility for the Cole retaliation would lie in the hands of the person in power, which happened to be GWB, as he just entered office.  Bush decides to ignore Clark and carry out his own agenda, and lets 9/11 happen.

I could post the exact same military personnel breakdown for GWB, but they seem to have censored a few parts of his records, so the entire military action or inaction for Both men is a moot point.

The final "Interesting Question" is absolutely ridiculous.  Hunting down al Qaeda came around in the mid- to late-'90s, which is what Richard Clark was working on.  In the meantime, I guess this soldier forgot his economy lessons and the way the government regards antitrust cases...

Wikipedia, and a little more digging around wrote:

In response to these attacks, President Bill Clinton ordered a freeze on assets linked to bin Laden. Clinton also signed an executive order, authorizing bin Laden's arrest or assassination. In August 1998, the U.S. launched an attack using cruise missiles. The attack failed to harm bin Laden but killed 19 other people. The U.S. offered a US $25 million reward for information leading to bin Laden's apprehension or conviction and, in 1999, convinced the United Nations to impose sanctions against Afghanistan in an attempt to force the Taliban to extradite him.
Hmm...Bush's approval rating from 2004-2006
aaand Clinton's approval rating
Mason4Assassin444
retired
+552|6902|USA

Darth_Fleder wrote:

Belx wrote:

At least Clinton did not invade a country with faulty evidence.
No, he invaded an intern and commited perjury in a court of law about it.
Blowjobs and Adulty ARE NOT AGAINST THE LAW!!! He should have never been in court.

Thats called a witch hunt.
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|6873|USA

Marconius wrote:

Promises, eh?  Perhaps you should go visit Mohammed Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Mahmud Abouhalima, Ahmad Ajaj and Ramzi Yousef.  The perpetrators of the '93 WTC attacks are all in jail for life, and much less can be said about the one possibly self-proclaimed mastermind of 9/11....

For each of those 'promises' you listed, retaliation was carried out and information was gathered.  Richard Clark was assigned to take down al Qaeda, and had a plan drafted after the USS Cole bombing.  Of course, the responsibility for the Cole retaliation would lie in the hands of the person in power, which happened to be GWB, as he just entered office.  Bush decides to ignore Clark and carry out his own agenda, and lets 9/11 happen.

I could post the exact same military personnel breakdown for GWB, but they seem to have censored a few parts of his records, so the entire military action or inaction for Both men is a moot point.

The final "Interesting Question" is absolutely ridiculous.  Hunting down al Qaeda came around in the mid- to late-'90s, which is what Richard Clark was working on.  In the meantime, I guess this soldier forgot his economy lessons and the way the government regards antitrust cases...

Wikipedia, and a little more digging around wrote:

In response to these attacks, President Bill Clinton ordered a freeze on assets linked to bin Laden. Clinton also signed an executive order, authorizing bin Laden's arrest or assassination. In August 1998, the U.S. launched an attack using cruise missiles. The attack failed to harm bin Laden but killed 19 other people. The U.S. offered a US $25 million reward for information leading to bin Laden's apprehension or conviction and, in 1999, convinced the United Nations to impose sanctions against Afghanistan in an attempt to force the Taliban to extradite him.
hear ye to that dood
delta4bravo*nl*
Dutch Delight
+68|6992
Clinton did something good for the USA bush is just fucking up the USA!!!!
psychotoxic187
Member
+11|6949

Naughty_Om wrote:

lets see. invasion of Iraq. Social Security. wire tappings.

Clinton... kept up foreign relations...we actually had money....can speak clearly.

bush...speaks like a 3 year old.

clinton...he handled kosovo well, handled the attack the world trade center in 93 with ease and organization......

COME ON...JUST LOOK at the facts....


bill wont serve again...hillary wont ever get elected, but anyone is better than bush......
Actually Clinton invaded Kosovo without sending it in to vote on, hence it was illegal. He did not handle the first World Trade Center bombings well, 9/11 proves that.
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|6873|USA

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Darth_Fleder wrote:

Belx wrote:

At least Clinton did not invade a country with faulty evidence.
No, he invaded an intern and commited perjury in a court of law about it.
Blowjobs and Adulty ARE NOT AGAINST THE LAW!!! He should have never been in court.

Thats called a witch hunt.
he was in court for lying under oath...but the american people didnt care. so they didnt impeach him.
TrollmeaT
Aspiring Objectivist
+492|6912|Colorado
politicians usually have so many skeletons in their closets that I'm surprised they aren't coughing up bones all the time.

This is true with all parties which just shows our government needs to be overhauled by the people, & make it for the people again.
FubarJonny
bUdSMoKEr
+47|6929
everyone bag on the president there isnt a presidents that 100% of the american people had no problems with maybe Washington but who can tell for sure so stop bitching about how bad bush is or how good he is and about clinton im will to bet that ur gonna be say that anyone is better thatn the next president its the cycle of life in american democracy
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6801

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Actually Clinton invaded Kosovo without sending it in to vote on, hence it was illegal.
Under whose law?  It was a conflict, not a war.

psychotoxic187 wrote:

He did not handle the first World Trade Center bombings well, 9/11 proves that.
Oh, yes.  Because it's not like al-Qaeda had plans to assassinate the pope and blow up over 40 airliners, before crashing a plane into the Pentagon, all in the space of 48 hours.  Oh wait, yes they did!

Does the fact that robberies still happen prove that police don't catch robbers?  No, it merely proves they don't catch *all* robbers in the act.
Marconius
One-eyed Wonder Mod
+368|6934|San Francisco

psychotoxic187 wrote:

Actually Clinton invaded Kosovo without sending it in to vote on, hence it was illegal. He did not handle the first World Trade Center bombings well, 9/11 proves that.
Wrong.  Read my post above.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard