BF2S Forums Transit of Venus

I'm saying Venus doesn't have anything to do with events on earth, it just coincides with some of them. Cause important shit happens on a daily basis.

and no I won't look up what astrologer is, I couldn't care less.

-Sh1fty- wrote:

and no I won't look up what astrologer is, I couldn't care less.

It's posts like this following previous posts like the one you made on the last page is the reason why many here consider you to be an idiot.

You believe the universe is 6,000 years old and read what's written in a book that has been modified countless times over the centuries by an organisation that specialises in thought control. At least celestial bodies do in fact exist and are observable.

Exactly. If one of the planets in our system altered its orbit we would all be affected, just one example.

not me


or shifty

And not just our eyeballs, but the entire Earth. OK

Jaekus wrote:

You believe the universe is 6,000 years old and read what's written in a book that has been modified countless times over the centuries by an organisation that specialises in thought control. At least celestial bodies do in fact exist and are observable.

Sigh

Have you ever taken the time to check out a non-dodgy site about creationism? Science isn't just nonreligious. Based on facts people make conclusions. My conclusions are different from yours. Does that make me, or you, wrong? I'm feeling like I'm not making sense here. One of those CBA to put effort into a discussion moods.

Think about it this way, M3thod. We all live on the same planet earth, all 7 billion of us. We have the same atoms, cells, fossils, etc. to look at. What people deduce from that evidence is different. I look at it and see proof of creationism, as do millions of others. You look at it as proof of evolution and the big bang, and so do millions of others. As you can see, there are multiple conclusions.

On a related note, congratulations. You are now promoted from Captain Obvious, to General Obvious for that exceptionally entertaining amount of obvious. Have a cookie, good sir.

-Sh1fty- wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

You believe the universe is 6,000 years old and read what's written in a book that has been modified countless times over the centuries by an organisation that specialises in thought control. At least celestial bodies do in fact exist and are observable.

Sigh

Have you ever taken the time to check out a non-dodgy site about creationism? Science isn't just nonreligious. Based on facts people make conclusions. My conclusions are different from yours. Does that make me, or you, wrong? I'm feeling like I'm not making sense here. One of those CBA to put effort into a discussion moods.

Yeah except that there are a whole heap of science that points out the earth is billions of years old, and the universe billions of years older. So yes, you aren't making any sense.

Creationism manipulates the facts to fit an ideal.

Science collates ALL the facts to draw a conclusion that is then constantly tested, evaluated and if needs be changed to fit the facts.

Anyway, there's another thread dedicated to such a discussion.

Ultrafunkula wrote:

Jaekus wrote:

Anyway, there's another thread dedicated to such a discussion.

This. Keep the ASTRONOMY discussion going on and keep that other stuff in the other thread.

Tyical Virgo response.

x = \_/

Damn snow blocking my view.

nukchebi0 wrote:

m3thod wrote:

you cant have 2 conclusions to 1 question genius.

If x²-4=0, what is x?

The one and only correct answer is ±2