Hey!13urnzz wrote:
wait a minute - is this finray on camm's account? this is precisely the knuckleheaded type of thing finray would say . . .Camm wrote:
waaaaaaayhaaaaaaaaaaay! /drunk13urnzz wrote:
ijustorderedakeyboardonline.thisone'sspacebarjustcrappedout.:\
I just bought a pair of the Definitive Technology BP7006 speakers.
http://www.definitivetech.com/Products/ … tid=BP7006
They're on sale at Vann's right now for $300 each. One hell of a deal: buying $1300 speakers for $600.
http://www.definitivetech.com/Products/ … tid=BP7006
They're on sale at Vann's right now for $300 each. One hell of a deal: buying $1300 speakers for $600.
Remember Me As A Time Of Day
Girlfriend's dad bought me this.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Starting a museum?
Where are the other keys?
They're on the back, right?
A different pad..?
E: Whoever thought rainbow was a good colour to put on anything that isn't for Gay Pride?
They're on the back, right?
A different pad..?
E: Whoever thought rainbow was a good colour to put on anything that isn't for Gay Pride?
Last edited by FFLink (2012-05-21 16:29:47)
Heh, I've got an Amiga A500+ as wellOrangeHound wrote:
Starting a museum?
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
It's a SPECTRUM.FFLink wrote:
E: Whoever thought rainbow was a good colour to put on anything that isn't for Gay Pride?
headband and wrist band colors of the day.
FFLink wrote:
E: Whoever thought rainbow was a good colour to put on anything that isn't for Gay Pride?
Bahahahahaha. I didn't want to point it out. Thought it was too obvious.coke wrote:
It's a SPECTRUM.FFLink wrote:
E: Whoever thought rainbow was a good colour to put on anything that isn't for Gay Pride?
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Well, they deliberately chose to use the gay part of the EM spectrum.
Those were the "in" colors of the time. Think disco and roller skates.globefish23 wrote:
Well, they deliberately chose to use the gay part of the EM spectrum.
Not to the marketing guys.RTHKI wrote:
i thought disco was the 70s
Had to buy one of these as that hard drive I got from eBay turned out to be IDE. The autofill form filled it in as SATA, and the guy apologised about that.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
They're handy for old drives, but suck if you want decent cable management, or have a case with side-mounting hard drives.
Yeah I know, it's only until I can afford a new SATA drive, then this one will get chucked in my server.FFLink wrote:
They're handy for old drives, but suck if you want decent cable management, or have a case with side-mounting hard drives.
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Yay - new computer on the way. Anyone played with the Z68 SSD caching wotsits yet?
[burnzz]Finray has, believe it or not[/burnzz]Bertster7 wrote:
Yay - new computer on the way. Anyone played with the Z68 SSD caching wotsits yet?
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
I wanted to, but didn't get a chance. Since it only allows you to cache a certain amount of space and I have a 128GB SSD, I was hoping I could create a new partition on the drive and cache to that. But as it turns out, you can't.Bertster7 wrote:
Yay - new computer on the way. Anyone played with the Z68 SSD caching wotsits yet?
So instead, I'm running a SSD for Windows and my primary applications, and everything else on a 3TB drive.
The 2 spare 32GB SSDs I have should be about perfect though I'm hoping. One for caching and one with a preinstalled Windows image on so I can reinstall ultra fast (to system disk running on a PCI E SSD) whenever I need to.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I wanted to, but didn't get a chance. Since it only allows you to cache a certain amount of space and I have a 128GB SSD, I was hoping I could create a new partition on the drive and cache to that. But as it turns out, you can't.Bertster7 wrote:
Yay - new computer on the way. Anyone played with the Z68 SSD caching wotsits yet?
So instead, I'm running a SSD for Windows and my primary applications, and everything else on a 3TB drive.
That's the plan anyway.
Your OS should be on the physical drive you want to link to the SSD cache drive.
At least that's the way I remember it.
At least that's the way I remember it.
I certainly hope not. That would be rather pointless.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Your OS should be on the physical drive you want to link to the SSD cache drive.
At least that's the way I remember it.
From what I understand you simply select the drive you want to accelerate from the RST utility, which for me will be storage drives.
My OS and apps will be running on far faster drives than the SSD I'll be using for caching.
After a few minutes scanning through uncertain, circuitous threads like this one on anandtech and other sites with people who aren't really sure but think it can be done, I've simply changed my opinion to "I don't know."Bertster7 wrote:
I certainly hope not. That would be rather pointless.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Your OS should be on the physical drive you want to link to the SSD cache drive.
At least that's the way I remember it.
From what I understand you simply select the drive you want to accelerate from the RST utility, which for me will be storage drives.
My OS and apps will be running on far faster drives than the SSD I'll be using for caching.
But if it works for you, tell me and the first thing I'll do is snatch up a 64GB SSD to cache this 3TB mofo.