If you look at bilateral agreements and various other relationships that are primarily run through State and USAID, and you compare mil-to-mil relationships with other countries and you then compare DoS and DoD budgets, you'll see what I'm talking about. Much bigger ROI from State.Dilbert_X wrote:
Bang for the buck? How so?FEOS wrote:
I've said here multiple times: we get more budgetary bang for the buck from the State Dept than from DoD.
It is protecting the flow of global commerce through those areas, not just ours. Pull off your "hate America" blinders and try some objectivity.Dilbert_X wrote:
The difference is the military is now protecting the shipment of manufactured goods from China to America, not the import of raw materials and the export of manufactured goods. That and the importation of ME oil to run your inefficient vehicle fleet and industry.You think the military has no role in trade? Read a history book. War of 1812. Barbary Coast Pirates (USMC Hymn much?). Sea of Aden. Straits of Malacca.
So having a powerful military is taking you backwards, not forwards.
Fuck it. What am I thinking? I'm talking to Dilbert. Never gonna happen.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular