west-phoenix-az
Guns don't kill people. . . joe bidens advice does
+632|6633
https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/Posters/Know_the_difference.jpg

too soon? .... too late?

Last edited by west-phoenix-az (2011-11-15 08:21:38)

https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p123/west-phoenix-az/BF2S/bf2s_sig_9mmbrass.jpg
Benzin
Member
+576|6242

FEOS wrote:

CapnNismo wrote:

FEOS wrote:

What I noticed was the difference in performance hit you take between the two when you go from HIGH to ULTRA settings. It seems to be more marked in the Radeon than in the GeForce.
I honestly can't see the difference too much between the two settings...
Radeon: High - 61.44
             Ultra - 39.99
                       -------
                       21.45

GeForce: High - 68.96
              Ultra - 55.50
                        ------
                        13.46

Granted, it's only 8 fps, but it still seems significant to me...
Yea, there is a difference there, but Ultra destroys my GTX460 at 1920x1080. It was still playable, but with enough lag to make it annoying. The difference in the textures was also negligible...
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5994|شمال

FEOS wrote:

CapnNismo wrote:

FEOS wrote:

What I noticed was the difference in performance hit you take between the two when you go from HIGH to ULTRA settings. It seems to be more marked in the Radeon than in the GeForce.
I honestly can't see the difference too much between the two settings...
Radeon: High - 61.44
             Ultra - 39.99
                       -------
                       21.45

GeForce: High - 68.96
              Ultra - 55.50
                        ------
                        13.46

Granted, it's only 8 fps, but it still seems significant to me...
Cost/performance. thats whats all about brah
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6654|'Murka

Beduin wrote:

FEOS wrote:

CapnNismo wrote:


I honestly can't see the difference too much between the two settings...
Radeon: High - 61.44
             Ultra - 39.99
                       -------
                       21.45

GeForce: High - 68.96
              Ultra - 55.50
                        ------
                        13.46

Granted, it's only 8 fps, but it still seems significant to me...
Cost/performance. thats whats all about brah
Cost data wasn't in any of the charts provided...and not all of us have a running inventory in our heads. So cost was pretty much irrelevant to the discussion, as it was never mentioned. Until now, that is.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6392|'straya

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Not sure why people are comparing the HD6950 and the GTX580. The GTX580 is twice the price of the 6950. The 6970 (which is still ~$150 cheaper than the 580) performs better at all 3 resolutions at high quality. (Although admittedly the 6970 falls back behind the 580 on ultra settings).

That was what I was happy about since I own a HD6970, and play at high settings.
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5994|شمال

FEOS wrote:

Beduin wrote:

FEOS wrote:


Radeon: High - 61.44
             Ultra - 39.99
                       -------
                       21.45

GeForce: High - 68.96
              Ultra - 55.50
                        ------
                        13.46

Granted, it's only 8 fps, but it still seems significant to me...
Cost/performance. thats whats all about brah
Cost data wasn't in any of the charts provided...and not all of us have a running inventory in our heads. So cost was pretty much irrelevant to the discussion, as it was never mentioned. Until now, that is.
u dont wanna talk cost, u wanna talk 8 fps. u mad, bro?
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6349|eXtreme to the maX
No he doesn't want to talk cost - Its an Air Force thing
Fuck Israel
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6654|'Murka

Beduin wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Beduin wrote:


Cost/performance. thats whats all about brah
Cost data wasn't in any of the charts provided...and not all of us have a running inventory in our heads. So cost was pretty much irrelevant to the discussion, as it was never mentioned. Until now, that is.
u dont wanna talk cost, u wanna talk 8 fps. u mad, bro?
Not mad at all (and cost is important to me both at home and at work, thank you very much, Trollbert ). Just pointing out that some of us don't have the costs of these things ingrained in our heads--I haven't done a build in several years (had to get off that crack pipe). So, since the only data presented was performance-related, that's all I had to go with in comparing the cards.

And it's less that it's 8 fps, it's more that it's still a difference of 15.5 on the high end...and less than 40 fps on the Radeon card. Again, just looking strictly at performance data. Taking cost into account would certainly change the perspective...but none of that info was offered for consideration.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5994|شمال
<3
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5994|شمال
SOLD the two gpu's
lost 60 € though
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
NeXuS
Shock it till ya know it
+375|6585|Atlanta, Georgia
https://i41.tinypic.com/2070294.png
Camm
Feeding the Cats.
+761|5212|Dundee, Scotland.

NeXuS wrote:

uzi has something like 600Gb
for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6032|Catherine Black
afxz #: do me a favour
afxz #: tech open thread
afxz #: your bro just said about my music library
afxz #: 8-)
afxz #: post this and say "itunes alone"
afxz #: https://i.imgur.com/DRNsr.jpg
afxz #: cool brah
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
NeXuS
Shock it till ya know it
+375|6585|Atlanta, Georgia

Finray wrote:

afxz #: do me a favour
afxz #: tech open thread
afxz #: your bro just said about my music library
afxz #: 8-)
afxz #: post this and say "itunes alone"
afxz #:
afxz #: cool brah
I dont think I even know 600GB worth of musicians...
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6875|949

you guys are both uzi's bitch
Camm
Feeding the Cats.
+761|5212|Dundee, Scotland.
beautiful.

my new pc has taken bfbc2 from 1280x720 @ low: <30fps
to
1680x1050 @ everything high: min 51, max 166, avg 99.5

for a fatty you're a serious intellectual lightweight.
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6032|Catherine Black

Finray wrote:

Finray wrote:

Weird bug I've noticed with Opera:

Constantly feels like low fps, scrolling is jerky, letters aren't coming up as soon as I press the keys, etc

but when I grab the bar at the top, pull down to un-fullscreen, then push it to the top to full screen again, it fixes it for like .. 3 seconds. Then it's back to low fps.

Anyone experienced this or got any ideas?
Fixed it by reinstalling video drivarz.
Thank you past Finray, I knew posting the solution would come in handy one day.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,741|6981|Cinncinatti
get a better browser?
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
SonderKommando
Eat, Lift, Grow, Repeat....
+564|6903|The darkside of Denver

Camm wrote:

beautiful.

my new pc has taken bfbc2 from 1280x720 @ low: <30fps
to
1680x1050 @ everything high: min 51, max 166, avg 99.5

you should be good to play bf3 then.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6875|949

Avg 100fps on bc2?
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6976|St. Andrews / Oslo

Ordering an iPad..

Question is, though, is the 64GB version worth the extra £80 over the 32GB? Anyone have any experience with them, and how much space you tend to fill up? Like, how much space do apps and such take?
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|7015|PNW

Camm wrote:

NeXuS wrote:

uzi has something like 600Gb
But you wouldn't have heard of it.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6654|'Murka

Jenspm wrote:

Ordering an iPad..

Question is, though, is the 64GB version worth the extra £80 over the 32GB? Anyone have any experience with them, and how much space you tend to fill up? Like, how much space do apps and such take?
We've had a 32gb 1st gen for a while now and haven't come close to filling it up, despite gobs of apps and movies for both the wife and kids.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6654|'Murka

Thinking about getting a new gaming keyboard.

Currently have a Z-Board Merc. Wondering if it's whats causing my problems in BF3 controllability. Plus, it's old and I don't think they even support drivers for it any more...

Suggestions?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6349|eXtreme to the maX
Bleh, wondering if a new PC for BF3 is really worthwhile.

Maybe I'll get one for Solidworks 2012.
Fuck Israel

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard