Poll

Bf3s Server Rotation

32 Man Rush3%3% - 1
32 Man Conquest50%50% - 15
32 Man Rotation Rush+Conquest30%30% - 9
32+16%16% - 5
Total: 30
NeXuS
Shock it till ya know it
+375|6312|Atlanta, Georgia
What would you like it see?
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5556

Conquest would be the most popular and need the least administering
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5556

No one likes switching between conquest ans rush anyway
Roc18
`
+655|5761|PROLLLY PROLLLY PROLLLY
If we're doing 32 man it has to be rush/conquest mix. They've made the gamemode better in this game compared to BC2. I actually enjoy playing rush now lol.

Otherwise 64 man conquest.

Last edited by Roc18 (2011-11-01 18:17:29)

NeXuS
Shock it till ya know it
+375|6312|Atlanta, Georgia
vote brah
gurdeep
­
+812|4725|proll­y
havent played the game, but since im pretty sure its similar to bc2, rush is fucking gay
Roc18
`
+655|5761|PROLLLY PROLLLY PROLLLY

gurdeep wrote:

havent played the game, but since im pretty sure its similar to bc2, rush is fucking gay
Nah nigga the maps are much better. Playing rush isn't as shitty.
gurdeep
­
+812|4725|proll­y
>implying the maps had much to do with rush being whack as fuck
Roc18
`
+655|5761|PROLLLY PROLLLY PROLLLY

gurdeep wrote:

>implying the maps had much to do with rush being whack as fuck
That was the whole reason it sucked for me. Most of the rush maps were way to big, Actama Desert rush and Arica Harbor rush are the perfect examples, I remember one map where rush was good in BC2 but I don't remember the name of it. In BF3 most of the maps i've played rush on were enjoyable, especially Tehran Highway.

Last edited by Roc18 (2011-11-01 18:38:19)

Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6119|'straya
64 player conquest with BF2ish settings (no 3d spotting, no health regen, FF on, no killcam) is working well for us. It's a pretty fun way to play bf3 tbh.
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,053|6593|Little Bentcock

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

64 player conquest with BF2ish settings (no 3d spotting, no health regen, FF on, no killcam) is working well for us. It's a pretty fun way to play bf3 tbh.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6438
FF needs to be off and killcam on or the game is total shit.
NeXuS
Shock it till ya know it
+375|6312|Atlanta, Georgia

Adams_BJ wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

64 player conquest with BF2ish settings (no 3d spotting, no health regen, FF on, no killcam) is working well for us. It's a pretty fun way to play bf3 tbh.
Definitely old school BF2 style.
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6119|'straya

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

FF needs to be off and killcam on or the game is total shit.
Not really.
Sturgeon
Member
+488|4911|Flintshire
Large conquest, set the tickets at higher than 400 though (5-600 should do) so the round last 30-45 mins instead.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png
Roc18
`
+655|5761|PROLLLY PROLLLY PROLLLY
You negros best turn FF OFF in the server
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6686

Roc18 wrote:

You negros best turn FF OFF in the server
stats r lyfe. FF off = no nade spamming fuck yeh.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6438

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

FF needs to be off and killcam on or the game is total shit.
Not really.
Well if you liked getting sniped and killed by your own retarded team then yes, it is better.
Roc18
`
+655|5761|PROLLLY PROLLLY PROLLLY

Cybargs wrote:

Roc18 wrote:

You negros best turn FF OFF in the server
stats r lyfe. FF off = no nade spamming fuck yeh.
Not necessarily. Nade spam happens whether FF is on or off. You just risk killing your own teammates with it on.
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6119|'straya

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

FF needs to be off and killcam on or the game is total shit.
Not really.
Well if you liked getting sniped and killed by your own retarded team then yes, it is better.
I very rarely get teamkilled. I don't know what retarded server you're playing on but about the only time I regularly get teamkilled is on Metro. And that map is AIDS.
Canin
Conservative Roman Catholic
+280|6445|Foothills of S. Carolina

I prefer conquest over rush, but I will play either.
Roc18
`
+655|5761|PROLLLY PROLLLY PROLLLY

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:


Not really.
Well if you liked getting sniped and killed by your own retarded team then yes, it is better.
I very rarely get teamkilled. I don't know what retarded server you're playing on but about the only time I regularly get teamkilled is on Metro. And that map is AIDS.
I got teamkilled like 10 times playing on the AU server with Nexus. Most of those teamkills came from being ran over by tanks/cars by my own teammates. Please do not have FF on in this server.
Sturgeon
Member
+488|4911|Flintshire
Or have it on but at a lower damage (50%) or something?
https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png
jord
Member
+2,382|6648|The North, beyond the wall.
What surge said, I like to tk people that deserve it, but 50% means less unintentional tks.
Sturgeon
Member
+488|4911|Flintshire
FF off for mines too if there's an option for that?
https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard