TopHat01
Limitless
+117|6135|CA

FloppY_ wrote:

dtacs wrote:

Support has C4 and Claymores, one of the biggest mistakes DICE made in BF3 removing a pure Recon/SF tool that defined the series.

I've seen it used once since release.
"defined the series" is abit over the top when you only refer to BF2
Both Bad Company games gave C4 to the Recon class, and considering BF3 resembles the BC series more then it's older PC predecessors, it's odd they'd give explosives to the soldier with unlimited ammo.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6944|Purplicious Wisconsin

TopHat01 wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

dtacs wrote:

Support has C4 and Claymores, one of the biggest mistakes DICE made in BF3 removing a pure Recon/SF tool that defined the series.

I've seen it used once since release.
"defined the series" is abit over the top when you only refer to BF2
Both Bad Company games gave C4 to the Recon class, and considering BF3 resembles the BC series more then it's older PC predecessors, it's odd they'd give explosives to the soldier with unlimited ammo.
Assault could be equipped with c4 in BC2, so it has been done before where the ammo class can get explosives. Support also has had the mortar call ability for in Battlefield 2 Modern Combat and BC1 but support didn't have ammo packs in either of those. It absolutely makes no sense.

Why don't they stop giving the engineer the rocket launcher, and give him both c4 and landmines instead?
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6516|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

FloppY_ wrote:

1942: (-claymores) Engineer
Vietnam: (+various traps and explosives) Engineer
BF2: Sniper/SpecOps
2142: Sniper
BC2: (-claymores) Assault & Recon
BF3: Support?

Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-10-29 18:08:03)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
chuyskywalker
Admin
+2,439|7078|"Frisco"

An assault person can't resupply their explosives (gren/c4) from their own pack, FYI. Negates a lot of the concerns.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6944|Purplicious Wisconsin

chuyskywalker wrote:

An assault person can't resupply their explosives (gren/c4) from their own pack, FYI. Negates a lot of the concerns.
In bad company 2? I resupplied my explosives all the time as assault. Just is slower than regular ammo.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,054|6853|Little Bentcock

War Man wrote:

chuyskywalker wrote:

An assault person can't resupply their explosives (gren/c4) from their own pack, FYI. Negates a lot of the concerns.
In bad company 2? I resupplied my explosives all the time as assault. Just is slower than regular ammo.
We are playing BF3.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6944|Purplicious Wisconsin

Adams_BJ wrote:

War Man wrote:

chuyskywalker wrote:

An assault person can't resupply their explosives (gren/c4) from their own pack, FYI. Negates a lot of the concerns.
In bad company 2? I resupplied my explosives all the time as assault. Just is slower than regular ammo.
We are playing BF3.
Assault have their own ammo packs?
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Pure_Beef_68
Pure_beef_69 -1
+20|6183

War Man wrote:

Adams_BJ wrote:

War Man wrote:


In bad company 2? I resupplied my explosives all the time as assault. Just is slower than regular ammo.
We are playing BF3.
Assault have their own ammo packs?
Have you even played this game?
Shem
sɥǝɯ
+152|6757|London (At Heart)

Assault has medikits. Support has ammo....
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6516|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
I for one, am glad they went back to the 2142 style classes... It's the most logical one...


Assault can heal and revive on the front line where it is needed

Engineers gonna engineer

Support hang back a little, players can fall back to them to resupply.

Recon should recon, but they usually sit on a rock waiting for someone to run into their scope
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
RDMC
Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!
+736|6795|Area 51
Need moar special forces.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5588|London, England
They got rid of medic? Now I'm really not buying the game
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Shem
sɥǝɯ
+152|6757|London (At Heart)

To be fair, the assault class was pretty useless in bf2
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6516|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Shem wrote:

To be fair, the assault class was pretty useless in bf2
qft
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6944|Purplicious Wisconsin

Pure_Beef_68 wrote:

War Man wrote:

Adams_BJ wrote:


We are playing BF3.
Assault have their own ammo packs?
Have you even played this game?
Haven't bought it yet

Shem wrote:

Assault has medikits. Support has ammo....
I know, just the way I read chuy's post, sounded like assault had ammopacks.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5714|Bolingbrook, Illinois

Shem wrote:

To be fair, the assault class was pretty useless in bf2
you forgot about noob tubing
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6641|'Murka

Jay wrote:

They got rid of medic? Now I'm really not buying the game
Medic = Assault

Geneva convention need not apply.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6516|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

FEOS wrote:

Jay wrote:

They got rid of medic? Now I'm really not buying the game
Medic = Assault

Geneva convention need not apply.
"Do no harm" right out the window
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6944|Purplicious Wisconsin

HaiBai wrote:

Shem wrote:

To be fair, the assault class was pretty useless in bf2
you forgot about noob tubing
Grenade launcher made assault boring and meh.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Sisco
grandmaster league revivalist
+493|6573
Loving this thread!
https://www.abload.de/img/bf3-bf2ssig0250wvn.jpg
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6698
BF2 assault was just a more useless version of medic.
.:ronin:.|Patton
Respekct dad i love u always
+946|7039|Marathon, Florida Keys

Shem wrote:

To be fair, the assault class was pretty useless in bf2
you could flashbang teammates who stole your jet/chopper if FF was off and you couldnt M95 them out
https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6516|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

Shem wrote:

To be fair, the assault class was pretty useless in bf2
you could flashbang teammates who stole your jet/chopper if FF was off and you couldnt M95 them out
That must be why they added the tactical flashlight? lol
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6905|Canberra, AUS

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

BF2 assault was just a more useless version of medic.
g3 was a blast to use though. tap, tap, dead.

Last edited by Spark (2011-10-30 21:53:51)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,741|6967|Oxferd Ohire
^ only reason i played assault
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard