then you might want to explain this : The Municipality of Anchorage has just imposed at $150 fee, effective 1 Jan 11, to process BATFE forms for CLEO signature.iceman785 wrote:
Ya know, if you lived in Alaska you wouldn't need a suppressor license or a conceal carry license... Gotta love this state.
Thanks for that link, SERE. Will check them out.SEREMAKER wrote:
http://thunderbeastarms.com/products/30p-1
How do they rate, quality-wise & functionally, in comparison to AAC, YHM, or Surefire?
Have been browsing around here
Not sure about comparing I've been at a range with someone using a thunder and he was extremely pleased with suppressorrdx-fx wrote:
Thanks for that link, SERE. Will check them out.SEREMAKER wrote:
http://thunderbeastarms.com/products/30p-1
How do they rate, quality-wise & functionally, in comparison to AAC, YHM, or Surefire?
Have been browsing around here
I'll be getting in my trust for my purchase of a supressed P22 in a few days ..... went through guntrustlawyer .... instead of waiting out 6 - 7 months on the paperwork from the feds I can turn around time of 2 weeks give or take plus if something were to happen to me, the firearm would just transfer from me to next on the list
still have to buy a tax stamp for each firearm but I plan on getting a P22, glock 19, SBS
Damn, don't those guys charge a arm and a leg for trusts?
I'm familiar with the benefits of a trust. I checked those guys out awhile back and they were considerably higher than the local dealers that do them.
much higher then just the BATFA forms but I would have to wait till we cycled out the current chief for a more pro-gun one or a judge ( turns out it has to be a certain type of judge )
plus like that I can add others to the trust that will potential shoot the pistols
I thought about doing an LLC since its considerable cheaper in the beginning but theres yearly fees and up-keep
plus like that I can add others to the trust that will potential shoot the pistols
I thought about doing an LLC since its considerable cheaper in the beginning but theres yearly fees and up-keep
Ouch. That might fall to a legal challenge. $150 for processing a minimal amount of paperwork is not a fee, it is a tax (arbitrary and capricious?)SEREMAKER wrote:
then you might want to explain this : The Municipality of Anchorage has just imposed at $150 fee, effective 1 Jan 11, to process BATFE forms for CLEO signature.iceman785 wrote:
Ya know, if you lived in Alaska you wouldn't need a suppressor license or a conceal carry license... Gotta love this state.
Got a legal question for y'all.
I have a Ruger Mini 14 which was manufactured in 1992. I live in New York State. Now, according to the assault weapon ban weapons made after 1994 can only have two off of the list of "evil" features. Currently, I have one (barrel is threaded for a flash supressor). If I was to add a pistol grip and telescoping stock would I be exempt from the ban because my carbine was manufactured before the ban, or still included in the ban because I would be modifying it to fall under the label of an assault weapon after the ban?
Thanks in advance!
I have a Ruger Mini 14 which was manufactured in 1992. I live in New York State. Now, according to the assault weapon ban weapons made after 1994 can only have two off of the list of "evil" features. Currently, I have one (barrel is threaded for a flash supressor). If I was to add a pistol grip and telescoping stock would I be exempt from the ban because my carbine was manufactured before the ban, or still included in the ban because I would be modifying it to fall under the label of an assault weapon after the ban?
Thanks in advance!
should be grandfathered in .... meaning if you're the owner with paperwork then you can modify with in reason[HOF]Mercenary wrote:
Got a legal question for y'all.
I have a Ruger Mini 14 which was manufactured in 1992. I live in New York State. Now, according to the assault weapon ban weapons made after 1994 can only have two off of the list of "evil" features. Currently, I have one (barrel is threaded for a flash supressor). If I was to add a pistol grip and telescoping stock would I be exempt from the ban because my carbine was manufactured before the ban, or still included in the ban because I would be modifying it to fall under the label of an assault weapon after the ban?
Thanks in advance!
but it would better to call up a gunstore in the area and ask them
Some firearm laws make absolutely no sense at all. They're written and voted in by people who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. I wouldn't trust a gun store with my money or freedom, I've heard a lot of wrong shit from people that should know better. NY is a bitch and a gun store will not defend you if you take their advice and your modification is illegal. I recommend you find and read your local laws. Research local forums for a starting point if you can't find where to start. Don't find a answer in one place and run with it. You may be OK state wise, but there may be a issue with city or county code. There is more incorrect information spread in the gun community than probably any other. Some places will bend you over for the littlest shit, really, some places will screw you for some petty shit. Your chance of getting caught is slim, but can be costly (incarceration/legal defense/fine) and may effect your future legal firearm ownership.
Last edited by west-phoenix-az (2011-10-18 22:13:14)
Thanks for the advice guys! Will do.
I'd look up how things are defined in the law.
Let's say, to be a "registered assault weapon" (or whatever they call it), it had to have those parts as of 1994 (or whenever the law said so). If that is the case, you are pretty much out of luck....unless they specifically said Ruger Mini-14s were "assault weapons" in a different part of the law. If the law isn't written that way, you might be good if the serial numbered parts were made before the ban. It depends a lot on the specific wording of the law.
Let's say, to be a "registered assault weapon" (or whatever they call it), it had to have those parts as of 1994 (or whenever the law said so). If that is the case, you are pretty much out of luck....unless they specifically said Ruger Mini-14s were "assault weapons" in a different part of the law. If the law isn't written that way, you might be good if the serial numbered parts were made before the ban. It depends a lot on the specific wording of the law.
Hangfire!
Lucky idiot!
Lucky idiot!
There's Arabic writing under the barrel, forward of the trigger guard.
And something written near the muzzle, with the number "32" next to it.
Get someone who can read Modern Standard Arabic in here?
Beduin?rdx-fx wrote:
There's Arabic writing under the barrel, forward of the trigger guard.
And something written near the muzzle, with the number "32" next to it.
Get someone who can read Modern Standard Arabic in here?
i used to, not any more though.
Last edited by m3thod (2011-10-21 14:47:43)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
I thought I read somewhere that was his daily carry.
It'll be in Delta's collection in 3 weeksSEREMAKER wrote:
It'll be on gunbroker in about a week