For example?FEOS wrote:
Israel has modified its list of demands over the years. You're right about that. It's become more amenable to the Palestinian position. Yet the Palestinians still won't budge.
Fuck Israel
For example?FEOS wrote:
Israel has modified its list of demands over the years. You're right about that. It's become more amenable to the Palestinian position. Yet the Palestinians still won't budge.
We've already covered it.Dilbert_X wrote:
For example?FEOS wrote:
Israel has modified its list of demands over the years. You're right about that. It's become more amenable to the Palestinian position. Yet the Palestinians still won't budge.
Yeah. They're complete fucking nutters...expecting the other side to recognize a member of the UN and to renounce an international criminal act. Absolutely batshit insane, those Joos.Cheeky_Ninja06 wrote:
Israel has added recognition as a state to its list of demands and that's outrageous? Sorry what?
That's against their religion, apparently.PrivateVendetta wrote:
I think everyone should just chill the fuck out in that part of the world.
Absolutely disgraceful act.
at least get your info right, brahPoseidon wrote:
So where were Beduin and Dilbert when, even after Israel swapped an enormous amount of prisoners for just one of their own, Hamas continued lobbing rockets into civilian territories?
Nowhere to be seen? Of course not.
US funds 25% of the UN, other countries should step the fuck up if they want a greater voice.AussieReaper wrote:
Absolutely disgraceful act.
How that can be seen as anything like promoting Democracy and equal rights is beyond me. The UN makes (baby) steps to promote peace so the US cuts funding like a spoilt child that just drops their bag of lollies.
Prisoner deal was a prisoner deal.Poseidon wrote:
So where were Beduin and Dilbert when, even after Israel swapped an enormous amount of prisoners for just one of their own, Hamas continued lobbing rockets into civilian territories?
Nowhere to be seen? Of course not.
UNESCO works to create the conditions for dialogue among civilizations, cultures and peoples, based upon respect for commonly shared values. It is through this dialogue that the world can achieve global visions of sustainable development encompassing observance of human rights, mutual respect and the alleviation of poverty, all of which are at the heart of UNESCO
AussieReaper wrote:
Absolutely disgraceful act.
How that can be seen as anything like promoting Democracy and equal rights is beyond me. The UN makes (baby) steps to promote peace so the US cuts funding like a spoilt child that just drops their bag of lollies.
Wasn't an option. Probably why the US has been working toward a different, multilateral, solution.if you listened to the speech wrote:
...triggers longstanding legislative restrictions...
The legislation is a pile of crap, not least when the US is simultaneously funnelling billions directly to Israel....triggers longstanding legislative restrictions...
When HAMAS renounces terrorism and the PA writ large recognizes Israel's right to exist, I bet that legislation will change.Dilbert_X wrote:
The legislation is a pile of crap, not least when the US is simultaneously funnelling billions directly to Israel....triggers longstanding legislative restrictions...
Really?FEOS wrote:
and the PA writ large recognizes Israel's right to exist.
The key difference being that both the US and Israel have recognized Palestine's right to exist via pursuit and recognition that a two-state solution is the key to a final peace settlement. The PA? Not so much.AussieReaper wrote:
Really?FEOS wrote:
and the PA writ large recognizes Israel's right to exist.
So how does the decision to cut UNESCO funding look to the rest of the world, that are waiting for the US and Israel to recognise Palestine's right to exist?
It works both ways mate.
You seem pretty fine with ignoring the Israeli bulldozers.FEOS wrote:
The key difference being that both the US and Israel have recognized Palestine's right to exist via pursuit and recognition that a two-state solution is the key to a final peace settlement. The PA? Not so much.AussieReaper wrote:
Really?FEOS wrote:
and the PA writ large recognizes Israel's right to exist.
So how does the decision to cut UNESCO funding look to the rest of the world, that are waiting for the US and Israel to recognise Palestine's right to exist?
It works both ways mate.
And I like how you ignored the first part of the issue. That was a nice touch.
Who's ignoring them? I've said repeatedly Israel should stop building settlements in the OTs.AussieReaper wrote:
You seem pretty fine with ignoring the Israeli bulldozers.FEOS wrote:
The key difference being that both the US and Israel have recognized Palestine's right to exist via pursuit and recognition that a two-state solution is the key to a final peace settlement. The PA? Not so much.AussieReaper wrote:
Really?
So how does the decision to cut UNESCO funding look to the rest of the world, that are waiting for the US and Israel to recognise Palestine's right to exist?
It works both ways mate.
And I like how you ignored the first part of the issue. That was a nice touch.
Recognising the right to exist contradicts denying the right to become a member of the UN.