thepilot91
Member
+64|6448|Åland!
Naturn
Deeds, not words.
+311|6817|Greenwood, IN
I thought engineers are the only ones that did that.
The A W S M F O X
I Won't Deny It
+172|5896|SQUID

aerodynamic wrote:

http://bf3blog.com/2011/10/battlefield-3-squad-management-screenshot/
Those fucking jews, why even bother putting it in if it's going to that faggotry.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6364|what

The A W S M F O X wrote:

aerodynamic wrote:

http://bf3blog.com/2011/10/battlefield-3-squad-management-screenshot/
Those fucking jews, why even bother putting it in if it's going to that faggotry.
If I want to find out what squad you're in, I have to click each one to see who the squad members are...
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
aerodynamic
FOCKING HELL
+241|5965|Roma

AussieReaper wrote:

The A W S M F O X wrote:

aerodynamic wrote:

http://bf3blog.com/2011/10/battlefield-3-squad-management-screenshot/
Those fucking jews, why even bother putting it in if it's going to that faggotry.
If I want to find out what squad you're in, I have to click each one to see who the squad members are...
you should boycott the game.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/8ea27f2d75b353b0a18b096ed75ec5e142da7cc2.png
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6901|Tampa Bay Florida
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6498|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Spearhead wrote:

http://bf3blog.com/2011/10/battlefield-3-console-stands/bf3-xbox360-stand-3/

freakin sexy
How utterly impractical
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|6870|BC, Canada
Haha you said utterly.
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6498|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Nic wrote:

Haha you said utterly.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/utterly
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|6870|BC, Canada
Haha you said dictionary.
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6000|Catherine Black
hehe dicktionary
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6498|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
...
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|6870|BC, Canada
The A W S M F O X
I Won't Deny It
+172|5896|SQUID
I usually just made my own locked squad in BF2 or BC2 because fuck 95% of derps in that game, but when you play with people you know (non-retards) you appreciate the squad system in both. This cum in the eye of a squad system would be laughable, if it wasn't for the fact we're going to have to use it for however long we play the game.
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6498|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

The A W S M F O X wrote:

I usually just made my own locked squad in BF2 or BC2 because fuck 95% of derps in that game, but when you play with people you know (non-retards) you appreciate the squad system in both. This cum in the eye of a squad system would be laughable, if it wasn't for the fact we're going to have to use it for however long we play the game.
I always wondered why some people would setup a 1 or 2 man locked squad in BC2... It's dumb because you waste 2 potential spawnpoints and squad-cooperation points and you force 2 other people to squad together on a full server, which means another 2 potential spawns and point-gain wasted...

There is no reason to lonewolf in BC2 or any BF game...

Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-10-19 05:02:37)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Sturgeon
Member
+488|5153|Flintshire

FloppY_ wrote:

The A W S M F O X wrote:

I usually just made my own locked squad in BF2 or BC2 because fuck 95% of derps in that game, but when you play with people you know (non-retards) you appreciate the squad system in both. This cum in the eye of a squad system would be laughable, if it wasn't for the fact we're going to have to use it for however long we play the game.
I always wondered why some people would setup a 1 or 2 man locked squad in BC2... It's dumb because you waste 2 potential spawnpoints and squad-cooperation points and you force 2 other people to squad together on a full server, which means another 2 potential spawns and point-gain wasted...

There is no reason to lonewolf in BC2 or any BF game...
Make sure cretins don't spawn on you when you're in a vehicle
https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6901|Tampa Bay Florida

Sturgeon wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

The A W S M F O X wrote:

I usually just made my own locked squad in BF2 or BC2 because fuck 95% of derps in that game, but when you play with people you know (non-retards) you appreciate the squad system in both. This cum in the eye of a squad system would be laughable, if it wasn't for the fact we're going to have to use it for however long we play the game.
I always wondered why some people would setup a 1 or 2 man locked squad in BC2... It's dumb because you waste 2 potential spawnpoints and squad-cooperation points and you force 2 other people to squad together on a full server, which means another 2 potential spawns and point-gain wasted...

There is no reason to lonewolf in BC2 or any BF game...
Make sure cretins don't spawn on you when you're in a vehicle
Huh??? 

You mean solo choppering right?  I always hated those faggots
The A W S M F O X
I Won't Deny It
+172|5896|SQUID
Hate because you can't do it, hey chief?
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6498|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
You are better off with a lemming as gunner than soloing copters in BC2

In BF2 it was viable sure, but you are a douchebag if you hog the chopper for yourself when you know there are 32 other people who would like to give it a wirl...

Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-10-19 05:27:11)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Sturgeon
Member
+488|5153|Flintshire

FloppY_ wrote:

BF2 it was viable sure, but you are a douchebag if you hog the chopper for yourself when you know there are 32 other people who would like to give it a wirl...
Some may call it smart, tough love to make sure your team win.

Be all nice and share and you lose because the mong in your gunner seat can't take down their chopper, tanks etc or solo and fuck shit up leading your team to win???
https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6498|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Sturgeon wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

BF2 it was viable sure, but you are a douchebag if you hog the chopper for yourself when you know there are 32 other people who would like to give it a wirl...
Some may call it smart, tough love to make sure your team win.

Be all nice and share and you lose because the mong in your gunner seat can't take down their chopper, tanks etc or solo and fuck shit up leading your team to win???
Oh sorry, I made the mistake of thinking games were meant to be fun again...
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
thepilot91
Member
+64|6448|Åland!

FloppY_ wrote:

You are better off with a lemming as gunner than soloing copters in BC2

In BF2 it was viable sure, but you are a douchebag if you hog the chopper for yourself when you know there are 32 other people who would like to give it a wirl...
but you just mentioned you thinks it's useless to have a 2/4 squad locked since it's "nood good teamwork" , a team works together to win the round , 1 good pilot+1 good gunner / 1 awsome "solo-guy" , and leave all the noobs to die on the ground/in boats = win


FloppY_ wrote:

Oh sorry, I made the mistake of thinking games were meant to be fun again...
winning is fun , owning noobs is hillarious, and owning skilled players is satifying

Last edited by thepilot91 (2011-10-19 05:37:59)

Sturgeon
Member
+488|5153|Flintshire

FloppY_ wrote:

Sturgeon wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

BF2 it was viable sure, but you are a douchebag if you hog the chopper for yourself when you know there are 32 other people who would like to give it a wirl...
Some may call it smart, tough love to make sure your team win.

Be all nice and share and you lose because the mong in your gunner seat can't take down their chopper, tanks etc or solo and fuck shit up leading your team to win???
Oh sorry, I made the mistake of thinking games were meant to be fun again...
This is war, solider. It's never fun.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/3dda27c6d0d9b22836605b152b9d214b99507f91.png
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6498|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
I play BF games mainly for the vehicle combat, if I can only get into a certain vehicle every 32nd round because everyone wants the 1 helicopter that is available and will otherwise grief and TK if they don't get it, that's not a very good chance of having fun...

BF games need a vehicle queue or something to make it fair and fun for everyone...

Sturgeon wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Sturgeon wrote:


Some may call it smart, tough love to make sure your team win.

Be all nice and share and you lose because the mong in your gunner seat can't take down their chopper, tanks etc or solo and fuck shit up leading your team to win???
Oh sorry, I made the mistake of thinking games were meant to be fun again...
This is war, solider. It's never fun.
Then go to war, I'm playing video games here...

Last edited by FloppY_ (2011-10-19 05:41:40)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
thepilot91
Member
+64|6448|Åland!

FloppY_ wrote:

I play BF games mainly for the vehicle combat, if I can only get into a certain vehicle every 32nd round because everyone wants the 1 helicopter that is available and will otherwise grief and TK if they don't get it, that's not a very good chance of having fun...
BF games need a vehicle queue or something to make it fair and fun for everyone...
If you think it's fun just flying a chopper go play local or something .

In my opinion : It's fun to fly chopper not only because of the "flying experience " but for the killing and I know that I have to play well in the chopper  so I won't lose it , therefor I think people who're like babies whitout their bottle should stay on the ground instead of trying to get a chopper only to find out WOAAH MISSILES WOOOAH BOOM BANG  WOAAAH TREES crash over and over again

Last edited by thepilot91 (2011-10-19 05:59:46)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard