Why was fatherted banned?
Intel Core i7 CPU 920 @ 4GHz || 3x2 GB OCZ 1600Mhz DDR3 || 80GB Intel X25-M Gen 2 || KFA2 GTX 480 1536Mb ||| Samsung T220 || Xonar DX 7.1 || AV 40 || P6T Deluxe V2 || Win 7 HP 64 Bit || Lian Li P80
See #15IrishGrimReaper wrote:
Why was fatherted banned?
Was it Andros?OrangeHound wrote:
See #15IrishGrimReaper wrote:
Why was fatherted banned?
5th ban in the last 60 days for the same thing.
No.War Man wrote:
Was it Andros?OrangeHound wrote:
See #15IrishGrimReaper wrote:
Why was fatherted banned?
5th ban in the last 60 days for the same thing.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p3669930Miggle wrote:
that's the dumbest thing I've heard all day.
It doesn't.FEOS wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p3669930Miggle wrote:
that's the dumbest thing I've heard all day.
Maybe that will remove the dumbness for you...
jord wrote:
It doesn't.FEOS wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p3669930Miggle wrote:
that's the dumbest thing I've heard all day.
Maybe that will remove the dumbness for you...
This is actually true and this is why mods fail.Stimey wrote:
If you're serious about banning for personal attacks there are another couple people I'd put in there with Teds.
Then again its the whole forum.
Last edited by War Man (2011-10-16 17:41:20)
For once War Man makes sense.War Man wrote:
This is actually true and this is why mods fail.Stimey wrote:
If you're serious about banning for personal attacks there are another couple people I'd put in there with Teds.
Then again its the whole forum.
If it doesn't, then the concept of "graduated response" must be lost on the lot of you.Sisco wrote:
jord wrote:
It doesn't.FEOS wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?pi … 0#p3669930
Maybe that will remove the dumbness for you...
I'm not "talking down to to you" from anywhere. OH clearly explained what Teds was banned for the amount of time he was. It was clear that it wasn't based on a single incident, and it wasn't without tons of warning.Stimey wrote:
Stop fucking talking down on us from your high horse.
Last edited by NeXuS (2011-10-16 17:58:24)
There are ways of doing just that.NeXuS wrote:
I just like turtles.
On a serious note i do agree. More than 60% of this forum flames and attacks other members. Period.
EDIT: It would be cool to see a post limit on those that get banned instead of shying them away forever. We have very few people here now as it is. Why not just keep them but make them think about what their going to waste their posts on.
I never said it wasn't adequately explained. I said it was the dumbest thing I had heard all day. Which it was.FEOS wrote:
I'm not "talking down to to you" from anywhere. OH clearly explained what Teds was banned for the amount of time he was. It was clear that it wasn't based on a single incident, and it wasn't without tons of warning.Stimey wrote:
Stop fucking talking down on us from your high horse.
It's dead simple....and then people say it's still not adequately explained? Really?
Doing just what?FEOS wrote:
There are ways of doing just that.NeXuS wrote:
I just like turtles.
On a serious note i do agree. More than 60% of this forum flames and attacks other members. Period.
EDIT: It would be cool to see a post limit on those that get banned instead of shying them away forever. We have very few people here now as it is. Why not just keep them but make them think about what their going to waste their posts on.