sure lets have it.Pug wrote:
Yup, including the double standard which defines discrimination to race specific.
Question 1:
http://www.womenspolicy.org/site/PageSe … ens_caucus
Not one penis in this caucus. Is the purpose of this organization to promote discrimination?
http://www.womenspolicy.org/site/PageSe … ens_caucus
Not one penis in this caucus. Is the purpose of this organization to promote discrimination?
Question 2:
What relevance does the NAACP have in this thread?
What relevance does the NAACP have in this thread?
Question 3:
You mentioned the KKK as your argument. Do you recognize the KKK cannot operate with legislative authority or influence in congress, and therefore is irrelevant to the topic at hand?
You mentioned the KKK as your argument. Do you recognize the KKK cannot operate with legislative authority or influence in congress, and therefore is irrelevant to the topic at hand?
Question 4:
Do you realize that if an all-white caucus was formed it would cease to be a functioning caucus if it did not follow the rules governing LSO's...rules that disallow your wet dream of having racist laws being passed?
Do you realize that if an all-white caucus was formed it would cease to be a functioning caucus if it did not follow the rules governing LSO's...rules that disallow your wet dream of having racist laws being passed?
more to come
NO Pug, you CANNOT ask a question without ANSWERING one FIRST!
Question 5: Allen West is part of both the CBC AND the Tea Party. How is he part of both organizations when both caucuses have members who have accused the other of being racist? Does this mean he hates whites and blacks equally? More importantly, if he's part of both, is he bi?
Question 6: If one person in the CBC is labeled as racist by you does that make the CBC a racist organization?
Question 7: If one person in the CBC is absolutely against racism, does that make the CBC a non-racist organization?
Question 8: If publically it seems that the one person from question 6 (Andre Carson?) and publically it seems that the one person from question 7 (Allen West?) are very up front about their beliefs are part of the CBC, which do we believe since one seems to cancel out the other?
possibly, what could a woman citizen need from govt. that a male citizen doesn't?Pug wrote:
Question 1:
http://www.womenspolicy.org/site/PageSe … ens_caucus
Not one penis in this caucus. Is the purpose of this organization to promote discrimination?
If they are looking for special consideration simply because they are women then yes, that would be discriminatory. If they are looking for special consideration because of needs exclusive to women, then no.
It is a racist organization with ties to the CBC another racist organization...Does that count?Pug wrote:
Question 2:
What relevance does the NAACP have in this thread?
Yeah I can buy that, can you recognize the NAACP can not either, yet the CBC is highly influenced by the NAACP. Would you stand for a white congressional organization to be highly influenced by the KKK?Pug wrote:
Question 3:
You mentioned the KKK as your argument. Do you recognize the KKK cannot operate with legislative authority or influence in congress, and therefore is irrelevant to the topic at hand?
DO you realize that an all white caucus would never be allowed to form without being labeled a racist organization? Kinda the point of the whole argument.Pug wrote:
Question 4:
Do you realize that if an all-white caucus was formed it would cease to be a functioning caucus if it did not follow the rules governing LSO's...rules that disallow your wet dream of having racist laws being passed?
I'll be herePug wrote:
more to come
Only difference is, the tea party has grounds in calling the CBC racist, after all they refuse to allow any other race within their midst. The CBC has no such grounds since there are quite a few blacks within the tea party ranks.Pug wrote:
Question 5: Allen West is part of both the CBC AND the Tea Party. How is he part of both organizations when both caucuses have members who have accused the other of being racist? Does this mean he hates whites and blacks equally? More importantly, if he's part of both, is he bi?
Nope it means he hates groundless accusations.
I doubt it.
Nope, the CBC is racist baed on its racist actions by refusing non blacks to join. It is racist by the elected officials spending time on blacks only issues whatever that is, and not the issues of all the people.Pug wrote:
Question 6: If one person in the CBC is labeled as racist by you does that make the CBC a racist organization?
Not sure how you can belong to a blacks only organization and not be racist. Akin to belonging to the KKK and not being a white supremacist.Pug wrote:
Question 7: If one person in the CBC is absolutely against racism, does that make the CBC a non-racist organization?
If you do not believe in the agenda of a blacks only organization, then what are you doing there?
Easy, Andre' Carson is a racist based on his words and his officiation with a racist organization. Allen West belonging to a racist organization that is blacks only and an organization that is clearly for the people, all the people does seem to be in conflict, and it would seem he might see that as well which has prompted him to resign from the racist organization.Pug wrote:
Question 8: If publically it seems that the one person from question 6 (Andre Carson?) and publically it seems that the one person from question 7 (Allen West?) are very up front about their beliefs are part of the CBC, which do we believe since one seems to cancel out the other?
Now a question for you. Since all of our laws are not race specific. Name one issue that our govt. should do for "blacks only" that it should not do for every other citizen. and if you can not think of one, then there is no other reason to have a blacks only organization other than for discriminatory reasons.
so, he quit the Tea Party Caucus?lowing wrote:
Easy, Andre' Carson is a racist based on his words and his officiation with a racist organization. Allen West belonging to a racist organization that is blacks only and an organization that is clearly for the people, all the people does seem to be in conflict, and it would seem he might see that as well which has prompted him to resign from the racist organization.
These laws are exclusive to women, listed on the accomplishments page. By definition, they get special consideration simply because they are women:lowing wrote:
possibly, what could a woman citizen need from govt. that a male citizen doesn't?Pug wrote:
Question 1:
http://www.womenspolicy.org/site/PageSe … ens_caucus
Not one penis in this caucus. Is the purpose of this organization to promote discrimination?
If they are looking for special consideration simply because they are women then yes, that would be discriminatory. If they are looking for special consideration because of needs exclusive to women, then no.
The Pregnancy Discrimination Act
The Women's Business Ownership Act
The Breast and Cervical Cancer Mortality Prevention Act
The Mammography Quality Standards Act
The Family and Medical Leave Act
The Violence Against Women Act
The Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology Development Act
Reauthorization of the Mammography Quality Standards Act
So based on your explanation...is the purpose of this organization to promote discrimination?
Well, I guess we have to define some things first.lowing wrote:
It is a racist organization with ties to the CBC another racist organization...Does that count?Pug wrote:
Question 2:
What relevance does the NAACP have in this thread?
1) what is racism? it's discrimination. since we are having some issues defining what exactly discrimination is in question #1...let's wait a bit on this part.
2) Is the NAACP a caucus? No. This is the point I'm making. The NAACP is a special interest group, but lacks "using the legislative process". Therefore, the comparison between the NAACP and the CBC is false.
3) Membership. Being a member in an organization doesn't me you agree with all ideals. I've addressed this later in the questions. So I guess we have to wait on the first part of this to be resolved "what is discrimination" as well as some of the later questions...
Ok, so we can put this one aside then. Yes, if there was a white supremist caucus, I would bet the KKK would be highly supportive. Aka, the members would get campaign contributions.lowing wrote:
Yeah I can buy that, can you recognize the NAACP can not either, yet the CBC is highly influenced by the NAACP. Would you stand for a white congressional organization to be highly influenced by the KKK?Pug wrote:
Question 3:
You mentioned the KKK as your argument. Do you recognize the KKK cannot operate with legislative authority or influence in congress, and therefore is irrelevant to the topic at hand?