you clearly stated previously you despised your time in the army.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
I hated the military, but I enjoyed myself on the weekends. You can hate your job but still have fun in your off time you know.m3thod wrote:
you clearly stated previously you despised your time in the army.
rofl. how can you just post the two things you posted one after another? you said you had just as much fun as a typical undergrad, but then said "i hated the military, but i enjoyed myself on weekends"... hahaha. um, undergraduates love what they do ALL THE TIME, it's fun. i had no responsibilities and partied every day of the week... why are you arguing over this?Jay wrote:
I hated the military, but I enjoyed myself on the weekends. You can hate your job but still have fun in your off time you know.m3thod wrote:
you clearly stated previously you despised your time in the army.
but just as good as a normal 18 year old moving away to university!m3thod wrote:
enjoying life 2/7 of the time doesnt sound like a fun ride.
It wasn't. Which is why I didn't re-enlist.m3thod wrote:
enjoying life 2/7 of the time doesnt sound like a fun ride.
It's nice that you took the easiest path that you could through college so you could have time to party. Some people, like those with degrees in the maths and sciences, actually had to do homework on weeknights (and weekends).Uzique wrote:
rofl. how can you just post the two things you posted one after another? you said you had just as much fun as a typical undergrad, but then said "i hated the military, but i enjoyed myself on weekends"... hahaha. um, undergraduates love what they do ALL THE TIME, it's fun. i had no responsibilities and partied every day of the week... why are you arguing over this?Jay wrote:
I hated the military, but I enjoyed myself on the weekends. You can hate your job but still have fun in your off time you know.m3thod wrote:
you clearly stated previously you despised your time in the army.
I wouldn't want to party every night Uzique. That shit got boring when I was around 21.Uzique wrote:
right. but then 2 minutes ago you JUST SAID that you had just as much fun as me (or a typical undergrad)
so which is it?
Honestly, university would have been shit if I'd lived at home.Uzique wrote:
i love how a guy from a naval college downtalks to me about the typical 'undergraduate student' experience, as if he ever had one, and then uses some spurious knowledge about me partying and having a great time to discount my own experience. i rinsed 3 years for all they were worth and i'm crazy nostalgic about university. i had the best time of my life, better than anything i could have hoped as a naive and immature 18 year old. who is jaded and bitter here? sounds like you, galt. all i said was that it's ridiculous imo to live away from uni, you're missing out on the most formative experience of your young adult life.
most graduates are just-21. 18-21 is the undergraduate period. so now you're basically agreeing with me and my post? awsm!!!!Jay wrote:
I wouldn't want to party every night Uzique. That shit got boring when I was around 21.Uzique wrote:
right. but then 2 minutes ago you JUST SAID that you had just as much fun as me (or a typical undergrad)
so which is it?
Do you feel that your degree was as difficult? Did you expend the same amount of effort? Did you spend as much time studying? These last two are easily quantifiable. So, did you? If the answer is no, then your degree was clearly not difficult.Uzique wrote:
"i did an engineering degree and it is the toughest degree possible and all other degrees and life choices are for slackers and cannot possibly involve much mental skill or intellectual ability because they are not engineering and my engineering textbooks were really difficult let me tell you and i cannot imagine for one second how any other discipline or university level course can involve this much staggering superhuman complexity"
this galt spiel again! lovely.
Maybe you just weren't very good at it.Jay wrote:
Do you feel that your degree was as difficult? Did you expend the same amount of effort? Did you spend as much time studying? These last two are easily quantifiable. So, did you? If the answer is no, then your degree was clearly not difficult.Uzique wrote:
"i did an engineering degree and it is the toughest degree possible and all other degrees and life choices are for slackers and cannot possibly involve much mental skill or intellectual ability because they are not engineering and my engineering textbooks were really difficult let me tell you and i cannot imagine for one second how any other discipline or university level course can involve this much staggering superhuman complexity"
this galt spiel again! lovely.
Last edited by Uzique (2011-08-05 13:39:42)
Maybe it's different in the UK than it is here. Here, people that go to school for liberal arts, be they english, political science, sociology, are equivalent to the same people that get a degree in physical education. They're considered cakewalk degrees for people that don't really have any skills. They also happen to be dominated by females, so there is a double stigma attached to male holders of those degrees. There's a running joke that people with liberal arts degrees become hipsters, until they get tired of being poor and go to law school. Then they become yuppies and politicians. This probably has a lot to do with why every American you argue with throws your degree in your face. It's not considered to be much better than a high school diploma here.Uzique wrote:
my degree was extremely difficult and extremely fulfilling. i read more books and exposed my mind to more theories and disciplines than i even knew existed when i was a fresh-faced, precocious 18 year old. i had to spend pretty much 4-5 hours a day every day reading, researching and hitting class. much other time was spent digesting shit and just trying to wrap my head around things, as well as branching off into all of the other areas of knowledge that a literature degree encompasses: background secondary reading in theory, philosophy, politics, history, sociology, psychology, linguistics, logic, etc. it goes on and on. i sure as hell do not feel that my degree was a doss. i don't know how it is over there with 'liberal arts' degrees but you are worked very hard here and squeezed like hell for time. most people don't read all the stuff on the reading lists because it is simply too many pages to flick and too much shit to take in and retain, so they pick and select as appropriate/interesting to them. i don't see why that's a problem or a 'weakness', either. tbh if you go to any prestigious russell/1994 uni over here and do any 'proper' subject, you're in for 3 years of real mind-opening academic testing. that's what it's all about. what do you think i did, swanned around and made up some shit about metaphors at the end of 3 years for an easy pass? it's not a community college.