M16 on full auto...........
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Pages: 1 … 172 173 174 175 176 … 683
Who said this abso-fucking-lute bullshit?Trotskygrad wrote:
HAHAHHAHA
"" Also since the m4 and m16 are default us starting weapons I did not want to penalize with burst only"
demize99 on his twittar-Sh1fty- wrote:
Who said this abso-fucking-lute bullshit?Trotskygrad wrote:
HAHAHHAHA
"" Also since the m4 and m16 are default us starting weapons I did not want to penalize with burst only"
awesome review, meth!m3thod wrote:
game sucks
I guess I'm going to be more worried about the stability of the game itself, rather than "will x gun fire automatically or in burst."UnkleRukus wrote:
Nitpicking : minute and usually unjustified criticism
Last edited by UnkleRukus (2011-07-25 07:26:54)
I figured you were.Trotskygrad wrote:
I'm not fighting, I'm throwing the breadcrumbs.
Last edited by Trotskygrad (2011-07-25 07:52:37)
I'm sorry, but judging from this video this is just looks like a reskinned BC2 with added bf2 elements. The fact that they're showing rush mode pisses me off too, because a real follow up to BF2, like was promised would revolve around Conquest, like the battlefield games have always have.M.O.A.B wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcZgbZwB … re=related
DON'T TRUST THIS MAN!RDMC wrote:
I'm sorry, but judging from this video this is just looks like a reskinned BC2 with added bf2 elements. The fact that they're showing rush mode pisses me off too, because a real follow up to BF2, like was promised would revolve around Conquest, like the battlefield games have always have.M.O.A.B wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcZgbZwB … re=related
And the gliding over everything higher than 2 feet just looks stupid.
Care to elaborate?a_reborn_vetaran wrote:
DON'T TRUST THIS MAN!RDMC wrote:
I'm sorry, but judging from this video this is just looks like a reskinned BC2 with added bf2 elements. The fact that they're showing rush mode pisses me off too, because a real follow up to BF2, like was promised would revolve around Conquest, like the battlefield games have always have.M.O.A.B wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcZgbZwB … re=related
And the gliding over everything higher than 2 feet just looks stupid.
Sprinting, ie, some classes getting more stamina then others.Trotskygrad wrote:
"Indeed. Thought about a bf2142 style system but doesn't make sense over #bf3 long distances."
I think that's about deviation?
I'm hoping the stock guns for each army get something to differentiate them from each other, and they aren't just the same weapons with different models and animations. With the promise of 'lots and lots' of guns - spread out like BC2 with one kit having 10+ primary weapons to choose from - coupled with (what seems to be) the rapid promotions through ranks any shortcomings of either stock gun could be made up through the use of an unlock.Demize99 wrote:
Also since the m4 and m16 are default us starting weapons I did not want to penalize with burst only
Sorry Just a troll on a specific person who may remember me.RDMC wrote:
Care to elaborate?a_reborn_vetaran wrote:
DON'T TRUST THIS MAN!RDMC wrote:
I'm sorry, but judging from this video this is just looks like a reskinned BC2 with added bf2 elements. The fact that they're showing rush mode pisses me off too, because a real follow up to BF2, like was promised would revolve around Conquest, like the battlefield games have always have.
And the gliding over everything higher than 2 feet just looks stupid.
big surprisem3thod wrote:
game sucks
Hehe ok, ye I do remember you Couldn't really figure out if you were serious or nota_reborn_vetaran wrote:
Sorry Just a troll on a specific person who may remember me.RDMC wrote:
Care to elaborate?a_reborn_vetaran wrote:
DON'T TRUST THIS MAN!
Last edited by RDMC (2011-07-25 09:55:23)
Pages: 1 … 172 173 174 175 176 … 683