was also worse than the vintorez for killing peopleTrotskygrad wrote:
was in AIX 2.0
Pages: 1 … 158 159 160 161 162 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread
truth, the AS50 raped everything up da arse thoughRTHKI wrote:
was also worse than the vintorez for killing peopleTrotskygrad wrote:
was in AIX 2.0
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6935
Two things I want for.
BF3 and
a pc that can run it
I've got enough money for it or... I can take a vacation.
BF3 and
a pc that can run it
I've got enough money for it or... I can take a vacation.
i wouldjord wrote:
Bullshit, nobody would voluntarily play Oasis on Rush mode.Sisco wrote:
Me headshotting a bunch of goons across Oasis Rush with the M14 by aiming directly at the red chevron says there is no drop.Sup3r_Dr4gon wrote:
I don't know about the ARs/SMGs, but the slug loaded pump-shotguns have zero drop. And I think the projectiles travel faster too, but I might be wrong on that.
It's a lot better on conquest.11 Bravo wrote:
i wouldjord wrote:
Bullshit, nobody would voluntarily play Oasis on Rush mode.Sisco wrote:
Me headshotting a bunch of goons across Oasis Rush with the M14 by aiming directly at the red chevron says there is no drop.
i agree
Oasis rush has got to be the worst map in gaming history. Even worse than the 2142 infantry maps.
its ok man. i just camp out with the neostad
Oasis rush = get vehicle scope + hop in a tank = fun
inane little opines
Or you learn to shoot without vehicle scope and use a useful perk.
Well, the scope is usually necessary because things are too small to identify. Sometimes you also can't tell if you're over or undershooting a target. The zoom is extremely handy.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
My fave shottie.11 Bravo wrote:
its ok man. i just camp out with the neostad
its also a sniper rifleJaekus wrote:
My fave shottie.11 Bravo wrote:
its ok man. i just camp out with the neostad
shotguns with slugs were the best part of BC2
that and the m95 railgun pre-patch
that and the m95 railgun pre-patch
what was it like prepatch? its still OHK to 20m, running around using it as a shotgun was the funnest plat
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
EA released (then quickly took down) their list of official online sellers, Steam was absent from said list.
Getting Physical copy anyways vOv
Getting Physical copy anyways vOv
Tru dat.11 Bravo wrote:
its also a sniper rifleJaekus wrote:
My fave shottie.11 Bravo wrote:
its ok man. i just camp out with the neostad
Or you learn how to use the vehicle scope.Rod Foxx wrote:
Or you learn to shoot without vehicle scope and use a useful perk.
inane little opines
Why would you?Shocking wrote:
Or you learn how to use the vehicle scope.Rod Foxx wrote:
Or you learn to shoot without vehicle scope and use a useful perk.
It doesn't provide any physical advantage over someone without it who has learned not to use it. Therefore any fight against a decent tanker will result in your loss because he'll have damage or armour. Also it very much prevents you from being agressive with your tank when the time comes, because you have nothing offering help in close quarters.
I've never understood why anyone would take it for tanking.
Because not all tank battles happen at ten meters distance. We need the zoom to see far away targets and engage them accurately.
Also, being able to hit your target from so far away he can't see your gives you all the armor you need. If he can't hit you back there's no stopping you.
Also, being able to hit your target from so far away he can't see your gives you all the armor you need. If he can't hit you back there's no stopping you.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Vehicle optics is the best Rush offensive perk. On Arica, when the rest of the team sucks, I can pretty much take out most MCOMs. On Oasis, with a competent gunner, the first two MCOM sets are just a killing fest. Any tank going up against me without optics has no chance of hitting me at the extreme ranges I'm firing from.
On defense however, I do go extra armor or extra damage.
On defense however, I do go extra armor or extra damage.
http://blogs.bettor.com/Battlefield-3-P … ews-a82210
Interesting, i seen this from several other sources as well. Don't know if it's legit.wrote:
Battlefield 3 PC system requirements – Gaming News
Battlefield 3, Electronic Arts’ return to the core Battlefield series, is nearing its eagerly anticipated release date, and as the day draws ever closer, the inevitable flood of news begins to flow.
GameStop, one of the United States’ largest video game retailer, gave the PC community of gamers an idea of what they would have to beef their systems up to if they wanted to run Battlefield 3. GameStop released both a list of Recommended Specs along with a Minimum Specs list, to let PC gamers know exactly how much they ought to be saving till the game’s release.
The Recommended Specs were listed as follows:
“Hard Drive Space: 15GB (Disc version), 10 GB (Digital version)
Operating System: Windows 7 64-bit
Processor: Quad-core Intel or AMD CPU
RAM: 4GB
Video Card: DirectX 11 Nvidia or AMD ATI card, GeForce GTX 460, Radeon HD 6850”
For those PC gamers who are cautious about beefing up their system for a game they have not played as yet, especially when Modern Warfare 3 will be releasing around the same time, there is an alternative. Battlefield 3 can also run on the following specifications:
Hard Drive Space: 15 GB for disc version or 10 GB for digital version
Operating System: Windows Vista or Windows 7
Processor: Core 2 Duo @ 2.0GHz
RAM: 2GB
Video Card: DirectX 10 or 11 compatible Nvidia or AMD ATI card
However, gamers are urged to be cautious as neither DICE, the game’s developer, nor EA, the game’s publisher, have confirmed the specifications.
This time around EA is opting to make PC the flagship platform for one of its titles. While this does not mean that EA would port inferior models on to PCs earlier, what it means is that the game was designed and developed with PCs in mind, meaning that the game would look its best on that platform.
The move should not come as a surprise as the Battlefield series, excluding the Bad Company spin offs, were all known as PC titles. Therefore EA is aiming to stay true to that fan base and fittingly so.
EA also confirmed that the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 version of the game would only run at 30fps (Frames per Second) while the PC version would run at a cool 60fps. The reason, according to EA, was that the Frostbite 2 engine had so much going on in terms of rendering that consoles would not be able to provide a smooth 60fps output.
However, EA also conceded that the PlayStation 3 version of the game would perform better than the Xbox 360 version. Again gamers are reminded that this does not mean that console gamers are getting an inferior version; it means that they are getting a version optimized for their systems.
Battlefield 3 is due out on the 28th of October on PC, PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360.
thank you masterstyle
abortion for all
Only 30 fps on consoles? That would suck balls.
Pages: 1 … 158 159 160 161 162 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread