so?eleven bravo wrote:
thats not what kmar was talking bout in the post you quoted.
there really is only one branch of the military thats unnecessary and redundant, if you could even call it a branch...
Tu Stultus Es
if you were talking bout army, you should mentioned army.11 Bravo wrote:
so?eleven bravo wrote:
thats not what kmar was talking bout in the post you quoted.
Tu Stultus Es
i think he got the gist
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2011-07-09 10:26:37)
Or merge them with the Army, I never clearly understood the reason behind the Airforce becoming independent of the Army other than "Other nations have an independent airforce."SEREMAKER wrote:
shut down the airforce branch
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Yes, and get rid of a useless MOS or two.eleven bravo wrote:
theyll probably just give out 16 year retirement/buyouts
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
That's because you're a moron.War Man wrote:
Or merge them with the Army, I never clearly understood the reason behind the Airforce becoming independent of the Army other than "Other nations have an independent airforce."SEREMAKER wrote:
shut down the airforce branch
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Or maybe I couldn't find a better explanation other than wikipedia which sucks. How about instead of saying I am a moron, you can instead explain to me the reasoning behind it?Jay wrote:
That's because you're a moron.War Man wrote:
Or merge them with the Army, I never clearly understood the reason behind the Airforce becoming independent of the Army other than "Other nations have an independent airforce."SEREMAKER wrote:
shut down the airforce branch
Last edited by War Man (2011-07-09 10:37:49)
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
merge the army and marines, then the air force and navy.War Man wrote:
Or merge them with the Army, I never clearly understood the reason behind the Airforce becoming independent of the Army other than "Other nations have an independent airforce."SEREMAKER wrote:
shut down the airforce branch
Why is the navy separate? Because they work at sea. The army works on land, and the air force works in the air. The only odd duck is the marines, but they aren't even a real branch.War Man wrote:
Or maybe I couldn't find a better explanation other than wikipedia which sucks. How about instead of saying I am a moron, you can instead explain to me the reasoning behind it?Jay wrote:
That's because you're a moron.War Man wrote:
Or merge them with the Army, I never clearly understood the reason behind the Airforce becoming independent of the Army other than "Other nations have an independent airforce."
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
and land. so what else?Jay wrote:
Why is the navy separate? Because they work at sea.
Helicopters are in the Army, working in the air. Explain that.Jay wrote:
Why is the navy separate? Because they work at sea. The army works on land, and the air force works in the air. The only odd duck is the marines, but they aren't even a real branch.War Man wrote:
Or maybe I couldn't find a better explanation other than wikipedia which sucks. How about instead of saying I am a moron, you can instead explain to me the reasoning behind it?Jay wrote:
That's because you're a moron.
Also, Navy happens to have aircraft working in the air, too.
Oh look, Marines have aircraft too.
Every fucking branch has a fucking airforce of its own.
Last edited by War Man (2011-07-09 10:46:41)
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
I would ask why do we still need the marines if there hasn't been an amphibious landing in 60 years, but I know I would get flamed for asking that so I won't.
hence why i said what i said a few posts upDoctor Strangelove wrote:
I would ask why do we still need the marines if there hasn't been an amphibious landing in 60 years, but I know I would get flamed for asking that so I won't.
army's airwing is practically dedicated to support of ground troops.War Man wrote:
Helicopters are in the Army, working in the air. Explain that.Jay wrote:
Why is the navy separate? Because they work at sea. The army works on land, and the air force works in the air. The only odd duck is the marines, but they aren't even a real branch.War Man wrote:
Or maybe I couldn't find a better explanation other than wikipedia which sucks. How about instead of saying I am a moron, you can instead explain to me the reasoning behind it?
Also, Navy happens to have aircraft working in the air, too.
Oh look, Marines have aircraft too.
Every fucking branch has a fucking airforce of its own.
navy's air wing is dedicated to support of it's ships
air force is dedicated to air superiority. lerp.
Why even bother to consider merging the Army and the Air Force? The administrative overhead just wouldn't be worth it.
and air.11 Bravo wrote:
and land.Jay wrote:
Why is the navy separate? Because they work at sea.
yeah it would be, the DOD budget wouldn't be the gigantic $ as it isunnamednewbie13 wrote:
Why even bother to consider merging the Army and the Air Force? The administrative overhead just wouldn't be worth it.
take a 100& of the airforce, shave 50% off and divide the other 50% between Army and Navy .... sounds easy doesn't, well it is
Army re-establishes the Army Airforce, they expand the airwing division to accommodate an influx of new personal and planes
Navy expands their branch to absorb new personal and take over airforce bases that are along the seaboard both stateside and overseas
close down all other Airforce Bases - Airforce Academy stays but now is Army/Navy Academy
Air National Guard stays but is listed under Army
of course all personal would not be transferring over to either branch
would it be a hair pulling experience, yes but thats life
It wouldn't change anything. Totally pointless.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
To coordinate large scale air missions and the logistics tied to them it's best to treat it as a seperate branch (i.e. airforce). That's the reason.
..
Been that way here since 2008/2009....eleven bravo wrote:
back in april my recruiter buddy told me that they dont have to meet quotas anymore. the army is full.
..
inane little opines
The hell? I want to join the army.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
The Army does so well with deep strike. It would be an awesome idea to turn strategic bombing over to them.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Worked OK in WW2FEOS wrote:
The Army does so well with deep strike. It would be an awesome idea to turn strategic bombing over to them.
Fuck Israel
You know how shitty our Economy is.... They're actually fireing service members..
Wow 15 years ago the recruiters were all but sucking dicks to get people to join, now they're full. We as a country are fucked and I can imagine that the Army and the Airforce aren't far behind with letting people go.
Wow 15 years ago the recruiters were all but sucking dicks to get people to join, now they're full. We as a country are fucked and I can imagine that the Army and the Airforce aren't far behind with letting people go.