Would make for a hell of an armoured battle.
Pages: 1 … 139 140 141 142 143 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread
BC2 does its best. Chews up an impressive amount of download limit for any sort of regular play.Dilbert_X wrote:
Do multiplayer FPS games really use much bandwidth?Spark wrote:
oh gods this is gonna be interestingtazz. wrote:
Bahahaha, 128 player support.
Australian Bandwidth says NO.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
How much are we talking about?Spark wrote:
BC2 does its best. Chews up an impressive amount of download limit for any sort of regular play.Dilbert_X wrote:
Do multiplayer FPS games really use much bandwidth?Spark wrote:
oh gods this is gonna be interesting
I read somewhere that BF2 used 100mb/hour.
noice 
Quite a lot. Would guess at least three times as much.KuSTaV wrote:
How much are we talking about?Spark wrote:
BC2 does its best. Chews up an impressive amount of download limit for any sort of regular play.Dilbert_X wrote:
Do multiplayer FPS games really use much bandwidth?
I read somewhere that BF2 used 100mb/hour.
Last edited by Spark (2011-06-12 06:36:46)
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
imagane a fucking 128v128 player clan match !
just madness on teamspeak.thepilot91 wrote:
imagane a fucking 128v128 player clan match !
I read at most BF2 used up 50-60mb/hour.KuSTaV wrote:
How much are we talking about?Spark wrote:
BC2 does its best. Chews up an impressive amount of download limit for any sort of regular play.Dilbert_X wrote:
Do multiplayer FPS games really use much bandwidth?
I read somewhere that BF2 used 100mb/hour.
Only way to find out I guess is to use the task manager, play for an hour and then see what it says.
Spark wrote:
Quite a lot. Would guess at least three times as much.KuSTaV wrote:
How much are we talking about?Spark wrote:
BC2 does its best. Chews up an impressive amount of download limit for any sort of regular play.
I read somewhere that BF2 used 100mb/hour.
This is obvious but needs addressing.
PC players upload once to the dedicated server you're playing on... and then download in a package all the other player's positions/actions etc
Console players must upload for each player that is in their session, and download from every other player.
And then they say "why is there no lag?" when using the PC.
PC players upload once to the dedicated server you're playing on... and then download in a package all the other player's positions/actions etc
Console players must upload for each player that is in their session, and download from every other player.
And then they say "why is there no lag?" when using the PC.
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
Im more interested in how much VRAM BF3 will use tbh
Aussie needs faster uploads for ping lel.
thank god i have 600gigs internode bandwith with no upload caps XD
thank god i have 600gigs internode bandwith with no upload caps XD
this is going to bad company 3. winning. bring it.
What do you mean?11 Bravo wrote:
this is going to bad company 3.
fuck...imagine the chaos in an urban infantry map....the nade spamming in karkand....oh god the humanity.M.O.A.B wrote:
Would make for a hell of an armoured battle.
conquest, rush, the MP video. its bad company 3 more than it is the new bf2.jsnipy wrote:
What do you mean?11 Bravo wrote:
this is going to bad company 3.
i agree those are good things; objectives make it more fun imo.11 Bravo wrote:
conquest, rush, the MP video. its bad company 3 more than it is the new bf2.jsnipy wrote:
What do you mean?11 Bravo wrote:
this is going to bad company 3.
I want BF2's weapon and map design with BC2's everything else. This so far seems to be that.
Analysis of the vids we were shown
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkiSRwzqI_c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5t0DCcfcAw8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkiSRwzqI_c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5t0DCcfcAw8
Last edited by GuliblGuy (2011-06-12 16:04:44)
if they are to be trusted, no more kidnapping in BF3
"the ability to decline a revive from a medic (as not to become a victim of stat-padding or just a greedy medic reviving you in the middle of a firefight)."
"the ability to decline a revive from a medic (as not to become a victim of stat-padding or just a greedy medic reviving you in the middle of a firefight)."
I dont know why people were bothered by that so much. Most of the time the medic had good intentions.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
All PC games don't have dedicated servers, and all Console games aren't peer-to-peer networked.tazz. wrote:
This is obvious but needs addressing.
PC players upload once to the dedicated server you're playing on... and then download in a package all the other player's positions/actions etc
Console players must upload for each player that is in their session, and download from every other player.
And then they say "why is there no lag?" when using the PC.
e.g., all DICE Battlefield games for the console run on dedicated servers, too, just like the PC versions.
Last edited by GullyFoyle (2011-06-12 20:17:49)
Clearly he was adressing the norm. No need to get pedantic.GullyFoyle wrote:
All PC games don't have dedicated servers, and all Console games aren't peer-to-peer networked.tazz. wrote:
This is obvious but needs addressing.
PC players upload once to the dedicated server you're playing on... and then download in a package all the other player's positions/actions etc
Console players must upload for each player that is in their session, and download from every other player.
And then they say "why is there no lag?" when using the PC.
e.g., all DICE Battlefield games for the console run on dedicated servers, too, just like the PC versions.
If you did want to get pedantic though he did say "all PC games don't have dedicated servers", when clearly many do...Adams_BJ wrote:
Clearly he was adressing the norm. No need to get pedantic.GullyFoyle wrote:
All PC games don't have dedicated servers, and all Console games aren't peer-to-peer networked.tazz. wrote:
This is obvious but needs addressing.
PC players upload once to the dedicated server you're playing on... and then download in a package all the other player's positions/actions etc
Console players must upload for each player that is in their session, and download from every other player.
And then they say "why is there no lag?" when using the PC.
e.g., all DICE Battlefield games for the console run on dedicated servers, too, just like the PC versions.
Sometimes if it dragged on it could get a little irritating to have your spawn timer constantly reset by a medic only to die one second later to x unseen enemiesJay wrote:
I dont know why people were bothered by that so much. Most of the time the medic had good intentions.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Are weapons faction specific in BF3 or are players able to equip every single weapon at their disposal like in the Bad Company spinoffs? I'm hoping it's the first... Also, am I the only one who dislikes scoring systems with inflated numbers, like 100 points for a kill? I prefer the simplicity of the scoring system in BF2 but I've noticed that they're going with a BC-esque type.
Pages: 1 … 139 140 141 142 143 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread