Battlefield 3 - Main Thread

2011-06-11 13:52:16

#3476

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6003|Catherine Black

yes.

2011-06-11 16:24:58

#3477

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6683

henno13 wrote:
ಠ_ಠ

http://i.imgur.com/54RQO.jpg

Don't laugh, there was this one thread on the EAUK forums about a guy bitching about a small inaccuracy in the Ay-Cee-Oh-Gee scopes used in multilayer.

2011-06-11 16:59:42

#3478

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6780|Area 51

M.O.A.B wrote:
Jay wrote:
I'm imagining Karkand grenade spam with 128 people in the meat grinder *shudder*
City would be instantly flattened by 128 rockets.

Indeed lol. Hotel? BOOM! What hotel?

henno13 wrote:
ಠ_ಠ

http://i.imgur.com/54RQO.jpg

I concur with these demands, fix those real life in accuracies or BOYCOTT

2011-06-11 18:33:40

#3479

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5394|Sydney

henno13 wrote:
ಠ_ಠ

http://i.imgur.com/54RQO.jpg

Was that made by shifty?

2011-06-11 21:13:39

#3480

dtacs: say that 2 my face fucker not online; +126|6050|Australia

That picture is pretty good, bet alot of people got mad at it.

2011-06-11 22:10:31

#3481

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,813|6321|eXtreme to the maX

War Man wrote:
If I want it to be fucking real, I'll play a fucking realism game. Games need to mainly be fun to be playable by me. A little bit of realism is fine, but you also gotta add in the fun element.

Go play Mario Karts then. I like some realism. Bunnyhoppers and arm-as-thrown claymores remove the fun for me.

Fuck Israel

2011-06-11 22:32:48

#3482

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6683

Dilbert_X wrote:
War Man wrote:
If I want it to be fucking real, I'll play a fucking realism game. Games need to mainly be fun to be playable by me. A little bit of realism is fine, but you also gotta add in the fun element.
Go play Mario Karts then. I like some realism. Bunnyhoppers and arm-as-thrown claymores remove the fun for me.

Bad example, they remove the fun for everyone.

I really could not care less about minor visual inconsistencies, but there are tons of people who are looking for an excuse to get pissed off at this game.

2011-06-11 22:40:01

#3483

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5394|Sydney

Mario Kart was fucking awesome back in the day.

2011-06-11 23:05:46

#3484

-Sh1fty-: plundering yee booty; +510|5689|Ventura, California

Just hope all the weapon reloading animations and models are correct. Freaking hate seeing incorrect weapons.

And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.

2011-06-11 23:08:04

#3485

Kampframmer: Esq.; +313|5058|Amsterdam

-Sh1fty- wrote:
Just hope all the weapon reloading animations and models are correct. Freaking hate seeing incorrect weapons.

as long as the ejection port is on the left

2011-06-12 01:05:15

#3486

Pure_Beef_68: Pure_beef_69 -1; +20|6169

Kampframmer wrote:
-Sh1fty- wrote:
Just hope all the weapon reloading animations and models are correct. Freaking hate seeing incorrect weapons.
as long as the ejection port is on the left

But it's not, or is that the joke...

Last edited by Pure_Beef_68 (2011-06-12 01:08:09)

2011-06-12 01:11:05

#3487

Jaekus: I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose; +957|5394|Sydney

You had to have been there.

2011-06-12 01:11:24

#3488

tazz.: oz.; +1,338|6390|Sydney | ♥

Bahahaha, 128 player support.

Australian Bandwidth says NO.

^{everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... _{seriously. ♥}}

2011-06-12 01:25:44

#3489

dtacs: say that 2 my face fucker not online; +126|6050|Australia

tazz. wrote:
Bahahaha, 128 player support.

Australian Bandwidth says NO.

http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f10-pr- … ponse.html

Its possible. On FB2? Probably.

2011-06-12 03:08:35

#3490

Kampframmer: Esq.; +313|5058|Amsterdam

Pure_Beef_68 wrote:
Kampframmer wrote:
-Sh1fty- wrote:
Just hope all the weapon reloading animations and models are correct. Freaking hate seeing incorrect weapons.
as long as the ejection port is on the left
But it's not, or is that the joke...

Spoiler (highlight to read):
a gentle troll

2011-06-12 03:59:02

#3491

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6890|Canberra, AUS

tazz. wrote:
Bahahaha, 128 player support.

Australian Bandwidth says NO.

oh gods this is gonna be interesting

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2011-06-12 03:59:36

#3492

Kampframmer: Esq.; +313|5058|Amsterdam

Spark wrote:
tazz. wrote:
Bahahaha, 128 player support.

Australian Bandwidth says NO.
oh gods this is gonna be interesting

i dont think its real.

2011-06-12 04:50:23

#3493

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6838|Little Bentcock

tazz. wrote:
Bahahaha, 128 player support.

Australian Bandwidth says NO.

*cough*

2011-06-12 04:57:32

#3494

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6838|Little Bentcock

tazz. wrote:
Bahahaha, 128 player support.

Australian Bandwidth says NO.

*cough*

2011-06-12 05:28:04

#3495

dtacs: say that 2 my face fucker not online; +126|6050|Australia

You've been jaded by the talk of 128 as a possibility on the FB2 engine, for BF3.

That isn't going to happen.

2011-06-12 05:50:48

#3496

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,813|6321|eXtreme to the maX

Spark wrote:
tazz. wrote:
Bahahaha, 128 player support.

Australian Bandwidth says NO.
oh gods this is gonna be interesting

Do multiplayer FPS games really use much bandwidth?

Fuck Israel

2011-06-12 06:04:00

#3497

bugz: Fission Mailed; +3,311|6527

FB2 is capable of 256 players. 64 is what they claim has the most balanced gameplay.

Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/ebug122

2011-06-12 06:05:04

#3498

Adams_BJ: Russian warship, go fuck yourself; +2,054|6838|Little Bentcock

Im happy with 64

2011-06-12 06:11:41

#3499

thepilot91: Member; +64|6451|Åland!

ebug9 wrote:
FB2 is capable of 256 players. 64 is what they claim has the most balanced gameplay.

actually I really can't see how they think 128/256 players on the same time wouldn't be fun , because that's what I believe I read when they announced that FB2 can handle 256 , that it "isn't as fun as 64 players"...I mean think of the CHAOS , I just loved the "massive" firefights that broke out in bf2 back in the days

although 64 is enough , I'd say : make atleast one map with 128/256 "resources"

Last edited by thepilot91 (2011-06-12 06:12:45)

2011-06-12 06:17:05

#3500

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6780|Area 51

64 vs 64 or 128 vs 128 community scrims, LEZZZ DO IT!

BF2S Forums Battlefield 3 - Main Thread

henno13 wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

Jay wrote:

henno13 wrote:

henno13 wrote:

War Man wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

War Man wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

Kampframmer wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

tazz. wrote:

Pure_Beef_68 wrote:

Kampframmer wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

tazz. wrote:

Spark wrote:

tazz. wrote:

tazz. wrote:

tazz. wrote:

Spark wrote:

tazz. wrote:

ebug9 wrote:

Board footer