Who cares...
woo hoo bf3!!!
woo hoo bf3!!!
...
Pages: 1 … 102 103 104 105 106 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread
because its arcade style and the maps are way too small for planes. and its relevant mrs tucker because i dont want bf3 planes to be gay arcade style made for noobs.thepilot91 wrote:
why do you feel dogfighting is ridiculous in bf2 then ?11 Bravo wrote:
no basis? i guess you were the only person to play bf2?
have I ever said I fly "real planes" ?
are there "real" planes in bf2 (a game)?
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2011-04-20 09:17:40)
Here you go sport.11 Bravo wrote:
because its arcade style and the maps are way too small for planes. and its relevant mrs tucker because i dont want bf3 planes to be gay arcade style made for noobs.thepilot91 wrote:
why do you feel dogfighting is ridiculous in bf2 then ?11 Bravo wrote:
no basis? i guess you were the only person to play bf2?
have I ever said I fly "real planes" ?
are there "real" planes in bf2 (a game)?
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
so you'd rather have PR planes ?
FYI 11 is a pilot in real life. And yes he'd rather have PR planes.thepilot91 wrote:
so you'd rather have PR planes ?
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
id rather you have to land to rearm and need an engineer to repair. id like it if you could not just be an engineer and hop out and repair but there needs to be someone in it in order for someone to repair it. that would cut down on the whores. or, give everyone the option to carry stingers. either way.thepilot91 wrote:
so you'd rather have PR planes ?
This. Would solve chopper whores and the rapehawk while still allowing skilled pilots to own the sky.11 Bravo wrote:
id rather you have to land to rearm and need an engineer to repair. id like it if you could not just be an engineer and hop out and repair but there needs to be someone in it in order for someone to repair it. that would cut down on the whores. or, give everyone the option to carry stingers. either way.thepilot91 wrote:
so you'd rather have PR planes ?
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
Considering everyone in this thread wants BF3 to be mildly entertaining for a short period of time requiring no effort whatsoever, after which they'll look back on it with mixed feelings before waiting for the next one
here's a suggestion: go fap instead. it's much more cost-effective with more or less the same results!
here's a suggestion: go fap instead. it's much more cost-effective with more or less the same results!
wut? i want it for a year at least
When you start using it as a thinly veiled insult (which is crap btw) then it becomes relevant, especially when you aren't much older yourself...thepilot91 wrote:
According to me 11Bravo is rather childish , and as far as I know he could really be 11.
What does my age have to do with how old I belive someone else is ?
There's nothing wrong with being 20.
infantry-carried stingers would ruin everything by being too big of a random factor. I am all for more powerful AA as long as it's not auto-aim bullshit but rather player-controlled. So that the AA user would at least have to aim at the aircraft while shooting. Inf-carried stingers would be one of those stupid point-and-click solutions.ROGUEDD wrote:
This. Would solve chopper whores and the rapehawk while still allowing skilled pilots to own the sky.11 Bravo wrote:
id rather you have to land to rearm and need an engineer to repair. id like it if you could not just be an engineer and hop out and repair but there needs to be someone in it in order for someone to repair it. that would cut down on the whores. or, give everyone the option to carry stingers. either way.thepilot91 wrote:
so you'd rather have PR planes ?
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Basically, what you want is a single player game where you can script your actions with the added benefit of 'killing' other people. Ohnoes, randomness.DUnlimited wrote:
infantry-carried stingers would ruin everything by being too big of a random factor. I am all for more powerful AA as long as it's not auto-aim bullshit but rather player-controlled. So that the AA user would at least have to aim at the aircraft while shooting. Inf-carried stingers would be one of those stupid point-and-click solutions.ROGUEDD wrote:
This. Would solve chopper whores and the rapehawk while still allowing skilled pilots to own the sky.11 Bravo wrote:
id rather you have to land to rearm and need an engineer to repair. id like it if you could not just be an engineer and hop out and repair but there needs to be someone in it in order for someone to repair it. that would cut down on the whores. or, give everyone the option to carry stingers. either way.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
BF1942 dogfighting was the best and most fun out of all of them. Ah the memories and the maneuvers I did. Not to mention it was much more fun just flying the aircraft. BF2 ruined dogfighting.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
fixedWar Man wrote:
BF1942 dogfighting was the best and most fun out of all of them. Ah the memories and the maneuvers I did. Not to mention it was much more fun just flying the aircraft. BF2 jets ruined dogfighting.
Last edited by ROGUEDD (2011-04-20 10:17:15)
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
Because making it impossible to get 30-0 KD or better will ruin BF3.Lucien wrote:
Considering everyone in this thread wants BF3 to be mildly entertaining for a short period of time requiring no effort whatsoever, after which they'll look back on it with mixed feelings before waiting for the next one
here's a suggestion: go fap instead. it's much more cost-effective with more or less the same results!
Because if I get shot down, someone will steal MY jet/heli.
Very good players should be able to go 30-0...Ilocano wrote:
Because making it impossible to get 30-0 KD or better will ruin BF3.Lucien wrote:
Considering everyone in this thread wants BF3 to be mildly entertaining for a short period of time requiring no effort whatsoever, after which they'll look back on it with mixed feelings before waiting for the next one
here's a suggestion: go fap instead. it's much more cost-effective with more or less the same results!
Because if I get shot down, someone will steal MY jet/heli.
Yes. But adding stingers would severely reduce that number to only " very very good players". The only "very good players" wouldn't be happy about that.jord wrote:
Very good players should be able to go 30-0...Ilocano wrote:
Because making it impossible to get 30-0 KD or better will ruin BF3.Lucien wrote:
Considering everyone in this thread wants BF3 to be mildly entertaining for a short period of time requiring no effort whatsoever, after which they'll look back on it with mixed feelings before waiting for the next one
here's a suggestion: go fap instead. it's much more cost-effective with more or less the same results!
Because if I get shot down, someone will steal MY jet/heli.
"People"? Nah... I'm shooting me some Iraqi-pixelated-dog:Jay wrote:
Basically, what you want is a single player game where you can script your actions with the added benefit of 'killing' other people. Ohnoes, randomness.
"We don't shoot dogs in Iraq"Graphic-J wrote:
"People"? Nah... I'm shooting me some Iraqi-pixelated-dog:Jay wrote:
Basically, what you want is a single player game where you can script your actions with the added benefit of 'killing' other people. Ohnoes, randomness.
http://i51.tinypic.com/2j2hp1f.jpg
So basically you want an easy-out option because you have never been any good in any game?Jay wrote:
Basically, what you want is a single player game where you can script your actions with the added benefit of 'killing' other people. Ohnoes, randomness.DUnlimited wrote:
infantry-carried stingers would ruin everything by being too big of a random factor. I am all for more powerful AA as long as it's not auto-aim bullshit but rather player-controlled. So that the AA user would at least have to aim at the aircraft while shooting. Inf-carried stingers would be one of those stupid point-and-click solutions.ROGUEDD wrote:
This. Would solve chopper whores and the rapehawk while still allowing skilled pilots to own the sky.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Fuck yeah we didDoctor Strangelove wrote:
"We don't shoot dogs in Iraq"Graphic-J wrote:
"People"? Nah... I'm shooting me some Iraqi-pixelated-dog:Jay wrote:
Basically, what you want is a single player game where you can script your actions with the added benefit of 'killing' other people. Ohnoes, randomness.
http://i51.tinypic.com/2j2hp1f.jpg
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Dumbfire missles.
Bf2 style rank requirements
unlock dumbfire missles at captain so every nooblet in the world doesn't have it
Bf2 style rank requirements
unlock dumbfire missles at captain so every nooblet in the world doesn't have it
What's that? 6-24 months, 300-900 hours of gameplay first? And only captain before you can pilot as well, correct?
I don't understand playing in a team called OpFor.
Surely if you're playing in that team, the other guys are the OpFor...
Surely if you're playing in that team, the other guys are the OpFor...
Pages: 1 … 102 103 104 105 106 … 683
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 3 »
- Battlefield 3 - Main Thread