I dunno, is the IDF planting bombs, blowing up markets and women and children as part of their war strategy?AussieReaper wrote:
No, only Palestine.lowing wrote:
thing is, shit isn't blowing up all over the world in the name of Judaism, pal
Yeah. They were even using white phosphorus against women and children, don't you remember?lowing wrote:
I dunno, is the IDF planting bombs, blowing up markets and women and children as part of their war strategy?AussieReaper wrote:
No, only Palestine.lowing wrote:
thing is, shit isn't blowing up all over the world in the name of Judaism, pal
nope I don't.....you mean the IDF had a strategy and policy of attacking women and children? Or are you trying to church up the fact that women and children were killed in the war? Ya know, like when they were being used as human shields by Hamas?AussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. They were even using white phosphorus against women and children, don't you remember?lowing wrote:
I dunno, is the IDF planting bombs, blowing up markets and women and children as part of their war strategy?AussieReaper wrote:
No, only Palestine.
If Suleiman has close ties with Israel I doubt he'll last long.Kmar wrote:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703313304576131461322124274.htmlIsraelis are bracing for a more adversarial regime in Egypt, one they expect could lead their country to expand its army, fortify the two countries' desertI wonder if this holds true if the Egyptian army supports the MusBro?Israel has reacted to Egypt's unrest by moving to shore up gas supplies and promising steps to bolster the Palestinian economy. It has quietly signaled support for a gradual transition backed by the army and controlled by Omar Suleiman, Egypt's vice president and longtime intelligence chief. Mr. Suleiman has close ties with Mr. Barak and other Israeli leaders.
Hamas, you mean the Democratically elected government?lowing wrote:
nope I don't.....you mean the IDF had a strategy and policy of attacking women and children? Or are you trying to church up the fact that women and children were killed in the war? Ya know, like when they were being used as human shields by Hamas?AussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. They were even using white phosphorus against women and children, don't you remember?lowing wrote:
I dunno, is the IDF planting bombs, blowing up markets and women and children as part of their war strategy?
The IDF has had a policy of attacking women and children since day one - but thats for another thread.lowing wrote:
you mean the IDF had a strategy and policy of attacking women and children?
when you attack FROM a position, that position becomes a legit target. When you know this and surround that position with women and children you have formed a human shield. Yes I mean Hamas. The ones that got elected and used women and children as human shieldsAussieReaper wrote:
Hamas, you mean the Democratically elected government?lowing wrote:
nope I don't.....you mean the IDF had a strategy and policy of attacking women and children? Or are you trying to church up the fact that women and children were killed in the war? Ya know, like when they were being used as human shields by Hamas?AussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. They were even using white phosphorus against women and children, don't you remember?
If you honestly believe that shelling a civilian population =/= human shields you are delusional. How does one use a human shield against helicopter gunships?
really? link pleaseDilbert_X wrote:
The IDF has had a policy of attacking women and children since day one - but thats for another thread.lowing wrote:
you mean the IDF had a strategy and policy of attacking women and children?
You're legitimising attacking women and children? That's truly disgusting lowing.lowing wrote:
when you attack FROM a position, that position becomes a legit target. When you know this and surround that position with women and children you have formed a human shield. Yes I mean Hamas. The ones that got elected and used women and children as human shieldsAussieReaper wrote:
Hamas, you mean the Democratically elected government?lowing wrote:
nope I don't.....you mean the IDF had a strategy and policy of attacking women and children? Or are you trying to church up the fact that women and children were killed in the war? Ya know, like when they were being used as human shields by Hamas?
If you honestly believe that shelling a civilian population =/= human shields you are delusional. How does one use a human shield against helicopter gunships?
no actually I am not, what is disgusting is putting women and children between you and your enemy, then attack over them, keeping them in the crossfire.AussieReaper wrote:
You're legitimising attacking women and children? That's truly disgusting lowing.lowing wrote:
when you attack FROM a position, that position becomes a legit target. When you know this and surround that position with women and children you have formed a human shield. Yes I mean Hamas. The ones that got elected and used women and children as human shieldsAussieReaper wrote:
Hamas, you mean the Democratically elected government?
If you honestly believe that shelling a civilian population =/= human shields you are delusional. How does one use a human shield against helicopter gunships?
Last edited by lowing (2011-02-10 03:40:10)
That isn't MY justification, that is EVERYONE's justification. get over it.AussieReaper wrote:
"when you attack FROM a position, that position becomes a legit target."
Was your justification.
Palestinians are already walled in and losing territory. They didn't choose to make their homeland a position, it was forced upon them.
Last edited by lowing (2011-02-10 03:46:30)
Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.lowing wrote:
really? link pleaseDilbert_X wrote:
The IDF has had a policy of attacking women and children since day one - but thats for another thread.lowing wrote:
you mean the IDF had a strategy and policy of attacking women and children?
Its just Israel's justification, not anyone elses.That isn't MY justification, that is EVERYONE's justification. get over it.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-02-10 03:47:08)
you made a comment as fact...now I am asking you to show me where you got your information.Dilbert_X wrote:
Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.lowing wrote:
really? link pleaseDilbert_X wrote:
The IDF has had a policy of attacking women and children since day one - but thats for another thread.
Hunter/Jumper wrote:
You forgot ~ Attack the Messenger ! ~. Remember My " Rape Tree " thread lollowing wrote:
Well, it is no coincidence that this forum reflects real life tactics by the left. The 5 D's of the liberal argument... dodge, deception, deflect, deny, discredit.Hunter/Jumper wrote:
I almost commented on " the insults not helping " but I must sound like a broken record at this point. Compared to D@lt and D~Bag, he is pretty cool and he doesn't switch topics in every rebuttal. On the whole at least I can learn a little from this guy if I don't agree with most of the views. He makes me pay more attention.
Constantly accuse of racism and Inciting Violence ! , ( until irrefutable proof shows you are actually the guilty ones, ,,,then plead for civility in discourse )Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.
Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2011-02-10 03:54:26)
cant think of a single instance where 2 warring factions ignored positions they were being attacked from.......I doubt you can eitherDilbert_X wrote:
Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.lowing wrote:
really? link pleaseDilbert_X wrote:
The IDF has had a policy of attacking women and children since day one - but thats for another thread.Its just Israel's justification, not anyone elses.That isn't MY justification, that is EVERYONE's justification. get over it.
at this point you should ' pull a D@lt ', as that is some pretty weak stuff your serving.Dilbert_X wrote:
Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.
Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2011-02-10 03:55:42)
ok, so you are not going to source your "facts"? right?Dilbert_X wrote:
History books - they're fun, you should read one one day.
Falkland Islands.lowing wrote:
cant think of a single instance where 2 warring factions ignored positions they were being attacked from.......I doubt you can eitherDilbert_X wrote:
Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.lowing wrote:
really? link pleaseIts just Israel's justification, not anyone elses.That isn't MY justification, that is EVERYONE's justification. get over it.
what about it?AussieReaper wrote:
Falkland Islands.lowing wrote:
cant think of a single instance where 2 warring factions ignored positions they were being attacked from.......I doubt you can eitherDilbert_X wrote:
Why don't you try reading a history book, instead of parroting neo-nazi blogs and Fox.lowing wrote:
really? link please
Its just Israel's justification, not anyone elses.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2011-02-10 03:56:48)
The British virtually shrugged off the Argentinians. Do you need a history lesson in everything?lowing wrote:
what about it?AussieReaper wrote:
Falkland Islands.lowing wrote:
cant think of a single instance where 2 warring factions ignored positions they were being attacked from.......I doubt you can either
obviously this was well before your time and " you need a history lesson "AussieReaper wrote:
The British virtually shrugged off the Argentinians. Do you need a history lesson in everything?lowing wrote:
what about it?AussieReaper wrote:
Falkland Islands.
