This is what a 17 giga pixel photo looks like
http://www.wimp.com/gigapixelphoto/
That's "giga" pixel. Not your lame 12 mega pixel.
http://www.wimp.com/gigapixelphoto/
That's "giga" pixel. Not your lame 12 mega pixel.
Holy cow!AussieReaper wrote:
This is what a 17 giga pixel photo looks like
http://www.wimp.com/gigapixelphoto/
That's "giga" pixel. Not your lame 12 mega pixel.
Where is that photo taken?AussieReaper wrote:
This is what a 17 giga pixel photo looks like
http://www.wimp.com/gigapixelphoto/
That's "giga" pixel. Not your lame 12 mega pixel.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
can you set me up with meredith cheersWallpaper wrote:
I think Burnzz posted a link a while back to a motorized mount that people use for those, crazy stuff. I wonder how long it takes to stitch and save those...
more portraits + new flash
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5246/534 … 987b_m.jpg
Cassidy by G. Moser, on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5284/534 … 9e59_m.jpg
Meredith 2 by G. Moser, on Flickr
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5242/534 … 48fa_m.jpg
Flash #2 by G. Moser, on Flickr
sweet titty christAussieReaper wrote:
This is what a 17 giga pixel photo looks like
http://www.wimp.com/gigapixelphoto/
That's "giga" pixel. Not your lame 12 mega pixel.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
Yeah, well, uh
This photo has a black guy in it.
oh exploitable
noice 
That second peak is half-dome, I got to the top of there over summer, what an insane view it was from the top!AussieReaper wrote:
This is what a 17 giga pixel photo looks like
http://www.wimp.com/gigapixelphoto/
That's "giga" pixel. Not your lame 12 mega pixel.
And he's not exactly a model himselfJenspm wrote:
'twas directed at Finray (he's bendtner)Wallpaper wrote:
watJenspm wrote:
bendtners can't be choosers.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6910
kiddies, I've decided I want a DSLR. It's gonna have to be an entry level one, cos I just don't have the funds for a really good one.
I'm gonna post links/suggestions and you guys are gonna help me choose in exchange for a warm feeling in your heart... and some karma. Alternatively suggest ones you think are good.
Canon EOS 400D
Canon EOS 1000D
Canon EOS 450D
Are Nikons any good? I've seen a few people using them.
Budget really is £400, MAYBE £450 if it's a great deal.
I'm poor and a student
I'm gonna post links/suggestions and you guys are gonna help me choose in exchange for a warm feeling in your heart... and some karma. Alternatively suggest ones you think are good.
Canon EOS 400D
Canon EOS 1000D
Canon EOS 450D
Are Nikons any good? I've seen a few people using them.
Budget really is £400, MAYBE £450 if it's a great deal.
I'm poor and a student
you've got a good eye, any of those will do well. here's the kicker - you'll change your camera several times, but you'll only change your lens when you want to use it.
i've owned the 1000 and the 450, both nice bodies. i'd take a 400 + another lens first, the 450d second.
i've owned the 1000 and the 450, both nice bodies. i'd take a 400 + another lens first, the 450d second.
cheers Burnzzzz, as the 400D is now replaced by the other 2, any idea what a fair price would be?burnzz wrote:
you've got a good eye, any of those will do well. here's the kicker - you'll change your camera several times, but you'll only change your lens when you want to use it.
i've owned the 1000 and the 450, both nice bodies. i'd take a 400 + another lens first, the 450d second.
Should I avoide buying second hand cos you don't know how it's been treated?
a good lens is always >50% used, a camera <50%. the 400D was $500 when introduced here ( i don't know the equivalent) but i would trust a used camera if
a) it looked taken care of
b) sold from a reputable dealer
c) sold by someone that was upgrading
a dealer should offer a short warranty - a private seller, ask them if they still have the warranty card.
a) it looked taken care of
b) sold from a reputable dealer
c) sold by someone that was upgrading
a dealer should offer a short warranty - a private seller, ask them if they still have the warranty card.
Burnzzz,
How does this sound?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000 … CM3WB5TS4L
Camera stuff seems to be way more expensive in the UK than USA.
But these guys are offering in 90 day warranty and 14 day money back guarantee
EDIT: Although the 1000D is just £30 more an more recent/new.... hmmm
How does this sound?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000 … CM3WB5TS4L
Camera stuff seems to be way more expensive in the UK than USA.
But these guys are offering in 90 day warranty and 14 day money back guarantee
EDIT: Although the 1000D is just £30 more an more recent/new.... hmmm
Last edited by bennisboy (2011-01-19 05:16:03)
the 1000D will come with the same kit lens, except - the one mine came with was ImageStabilized (IS)
for 30 more, i'd do it.
the difference is in the processor, and the sensor in the 1000d seemed to pick up more light.
the fountain outside my workplace . . .
for 30 more, i'd do it.
the difference is in the processor, and the sensor in the 1000d seemed to pick up more light.
the fountain outside my workplace . . .
but don't buy a haunted one.
Adams_BJ wrote:
but don't buy a haunted one.
