Kmar wrote:
You had to know something interesting would come out of the quarter million diplomatic cables that WikiLeaks just, well, leaked late on Sunday, and the New York Times has picked out a doozie for us. As it turns out, that big brouhaha in China surrounding the hacking of Gmail accounts was actually a state-authorized attack. Such was the report from a Chinese informant working for the US embassy, and the disclosure goes on to say that it was part of a "coordinated campaign of computer sabotage," reaching a wide net of targets, including American government machines, American private businesses, and... the Dalai Lama. Hey, China's hardly the first country to ever engage in state-sponsored cyber espionage (ahem, Stuxnet), but we can't say we're not disappointed. Let's keep it classy from here on out, alright guys?
Well we knew it was China. We (the public) weren't sure it was state sponsored though.
Interesting. Has someone claimed definitive proof that Stuxnet is state-sponsored? I know the theory du jour is that it's Israeli at this point, but I haven't seen anything more than circumstantial conjecture.
As for this disclosure from Wikileaks, it appears to be an attempt to embarrass, rather than an attempt to "shed light" on some nefarious activity like the previous disclosures. The gist of the reports thus far seem to be focused on assessments by embassy staffs/country teams regarding various world leaders that might be embarrassing for them and/or the US...but nothing that would be considered "wrong".
Just Assange trolling, essentially. Again.
But perhaps there could actually be some goodness to come from this. The "revelations" regarding Saudi's concerns about Iran (shows it's not just a US-Israeli cabal a la Dilbert's wet dreams) and China's state-sponsored hackfest, among others. For some reason, people will believe it when it comes from Wikileaks, but not when they read it elsewhere...