Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6777|Long Island, New York

Uzique wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

I'm afraid to go on the Wikileaks site to see what was released. The FBI will blackflag me

One of the things I heard was there's a plan between SK and the US for when NK collapses. ...So? Everyone knows it's going to happen eventually.
fairplay, one impression i have of you from the last few threads in D&ST is that you are one paranoid kid...
for someone who accuses me of not knowing what i'm talking about, you sure love to make it evident of yourself

and way to not spot a facetious comment mr. englit major!
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5477|Cleveland, Ohio

Mekstizzle wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Mek were you hitting f5 every minute to see if it was released?

lol

Claims of inappropriate behaviour by a member of the British royal family.
I'm guessing you were though on this thread so you could say that to me
sorry sir but there is a 26 minute gap
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6972|St. Andrews / Oslo

North Korea's Kim Jong-il is a "flabby old chap" suffering from trauma from a stroke, while Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is referred to as "Hitler".
haha
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6346|eXtreme to the maX
Late on Saturday Washington ruled out negotiating with WikiLeaks, saying it possessed the cables in violation of US law.

US officials said this was in response to a letter Assange had sent to the State Department on Friday in which he had tried to address concerns that the planned release placed individuals at risk.
Seems remarkably dumb to me.
Fuck Israel
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6346|eXtreme to the maX
7 Notable leaks
7.1 Pre-2009
7.1.1 Apparent Somali assassination order
7.1.2 Daniel arap Moi family corruption
7.1.3 Bank Julius Baer lawsuit
7.1.4 Guant
Fuck Israel
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6841|132 and Bush

You know what's interesting to me? Not the content of the leaks .. but rather that it keeps happening. Is this part of one incredibly huge leak, or this an on going phenomenon?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6239|Vortex Ring State

Kmar wrote:

You know what's interesting to me? Not the content of the leaks .. but rather that it keeps happening. Is this part of one incredibly huge leak, or this an on going phenomenon?
You know what's interesting to me?

Who gives this shit to wikileaks anyways
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6841|132 and Bush

That's kinda where I was going.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6651|'Murka

Kmar wrote:

You know what's interesting to me? Not the content of the leaks .. but rather that it keeps happening. Is this part of one incredibly huge leak, or this an on going phenomenon?
I believe this is all part of the treasure trove that numbnuts Army intel troop gave them. It started with the Apache video, transitioned to the SIGACTS database, now to the State Dept cables. They'll eventually run out of what he gave them.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6841|132 and Bush

PFC Manning. This is the downside of info sharing between agencies. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45650.html
Xbone Stormsurgezz
BVC
Member
+325|6935
Saudia Arabia urges the US to arrack Iran; The US doesn't attack Iran, instead trying diplomatic/economic measures.  How embarrassing for the US, being all level headed and stuff.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6841|132 and Bush

What beth is trying to say is that it is embarrasing because the saudis trusted us to keep what they were saying in confidence.


Edit .. well he delete the post
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6841|132 and Bush

The NYT:   "The Times, after consultations with the State Department, has withheld from articles and removed from documents it is posting online the names of some people who spoke privately to diplomats and might be at risk if they were publicly identified. The Times is also withholding some passages or entire cables whose disclosure could compromise American intelligence efforts. While the White House said it anticipated WikiLeaks would make public “several hundred thousand” cables Sunday night, the organization posted only 220 released and redacted by The Times and several European publications."

Some preliminary details
  • Bargaining to empty the Guantánamo Bay prison: When American diplomats pressed other countries to resettle detainees, they became reluctant players in a State Department version of “Let’s Make a Deal.” Slovenia was told to take a prisoner if it wanted to meet with President Obama, while the island nation of Kiribati was offered incentives worth millions of dollars to take in Chinese Muslim detainees, cables from diplomats recounted. The Americans, meanwhile, suggested that accepting more prisoners would be “a low-cost way for Belgium to attain prominence in Europe.”
  • Suspicions of corruption in the Afghan government: When Afghanistan’s vice president visited the United Arab Emirates last year, local authorities working with the Drug Enforcement Administration discovered that he was carrying $52 million in cash. With wry understatement, a cable from the American Embassy in Kabul called the money “a significant amount” that the official, Ahmed Zia Massoud, “was ultimately allowed to keep without revealing the money’s origin or destination.” (Mr. Massoud denies taking any money out of Afghanistan.)
  • A global computer hacking effort: China’s Politburo directed the intrusion into Google’s computer systems in that country, a Chinese contact told the American Embassy in Beijing in January, one cable reported. The Google hacking was part of a coordinated campaign of computer sabotage carried out by government operatives, private security experts and Internet outlaws recruited by the Chinese government. They have broken into American government computers and those of Western allies, the Dalai Lama and American businesses since 2002, cables said.
  • Mixed records against terrorism: Saudi donors remain the chief financiers of Sunni militant groups like Al Qaeda, and the tiny Persian Gulf state of Qatar, a generous host to the American military for years, was the “worst in the region” in counterterrorism efforts, according to a State Department cable last December. Qatar’s security service was “hesitant to act against known terrorists out of concern for appearing to be aligned with the U.S. and provoking reprisals,” the cable said.
  • An intriguing alliance: American diplomats in Rome reported in 2009 on what their Italian contacts described as an extraordinarily close relationship between Vladimir V. Putin, the Russian prime minister, and Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister and business magnate, including “lavish gifts,” lucrative energy contracts and a “shadowy” Russian-speaking Italian go-between. They wrote that Mr. Berlusconi “appears increasingly to be the mouthpiece of Putin” in Europe. The diplomats also noted that while Mr. Putin enjoyed supremacy over all other public figures in Russia, he was undermined by an unmanageable bureaucracy that often ignored his edicts.
  • Arms deliveries to militants: Cables describe the United States’ failing struggle to prevent Syria from supplying arms to Hezbollah in Lebanon, which has amassed a huge stockpile since its 2006 war with Israel. One week after President Bashar al-Assad promised a top State Department official that he would not send “new” arms to Hezbollah, the United States complained that it had information that Syria was providing increasingly sophisticated weapons to the group.
  • Clashes with Europe over human rights: American officials sharply warned Germany in 2007 not to enforce arrest warrants for Central Intelligence Agency officers involved in a bungled operation in which an innocent German citizen with the same name as a suspected militant was mistakenly kidnapped and held for months in Afghanistan. A senior American diplomat told a German official “that our intention was not to threaten Germany, but rather to urge that the German government weigh carefully at every step of the way the implications for relations with the U.S.”
The cables show that nearly a decade after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the dark shadow of terrorism still dominates the United States’ relations with the world. They depict the Obama administration struggling to sort out which Pakistanis are trustworthy partners against Al Qaeda, adding Australians who have disappeared in the Middle East to terrorist watch lists, and assessing whether a lurking rickshaw driver in Lahore, Pakistan, was awaiting fares or conducting surveillance of the road to the American Consulate.They show officials managing relations with a China on the rise and a Russia retreating from democracy. They document years of effort to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon — and of worry about a possible Israeli strike on Iran with the same goal.Even when they recount events that are already known, the cables offer remarkable details.
11,000 are classified “secret,” 9,000 are labeled “noforn,” shorthand for material considered too delicate to be shared with any foreign government, and 4,000 are designated both secret and noforn.
  • For instance, it has been previously reported that the Yemeni government has sought to cover up the American role in missile strikes against the local branch of Al Qaeda. But a cable’s fly-on-the-wall account of a January meeting between the Yemeni president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, and Gen. David H. Petraeus, then the American commander in the Middle East, is breathtaking.
  • “We’ll continue saying the bombs are ours, not yours,” Mr. Saleh said, according to the cable sent by the American ambassador, prompting Yemen’s deputy prime minister to “joke that he had just ‘lied’ by telling Parliament” that Yemen had carried out the strikes.
  • Mr. Saleh, who at other times resisted American counterterrorism requests, was in a lighthearted mood. The authoritarian ruler of a conservative Muslim country, Mr. Saleh complains of smuggling from nearby Djibouti, but tells General Petraeus that his concerns are drugs and weapons, not whiskey, “provided it’s good whiskey.”
  • Likewise, press reports detailed the unhappiness of the Libyan leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, when he was not permitted to set up his tent in Manhattan or to visit ground zero during a United Nations session last year.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6393|what

It's reassuring to note how concerned the Middle East region really is with Iran and it's nuclear ambitions. I was a little shocked though that the Saudis wanted a military strike on Iran.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
globefish23
sophisticated slacker
+334|6564|Graz, Austria

AussieReaper wrote:

I was a little shocked though that the Saudis wanted a military strike on Iran.
Maybe they fear that Iran will try to snatch the last drops of Saudi oil, when all reserves are depleted in the future.

When Saudi Arabia runs out of oil, they're effectively back to nomad shepherds. They'd need to rip-off the pilgrims in Mecca with hefty admissions and overpriced merchandise.
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7015|Moscow, Russia

Trotskygrad wrote:

Kmar wrote:

You know what's interesting to me? Not the content of the leaks .. but rather that it keeps happening. Is this part of one incredibly huge leak, or this an on going phenomenon?
You know what's interesting to me?

Who gives this shit to wikileaks anyways

Kmar wrote:

That's kinda where I was going.
you know what interests me? who stays to profit from all this. this shit could not really be a kind of "trolling on massive scale", could it? there must be reason to all this - and, honestly, trying to fuck up united states now would be slashing at the branch we all sit on. win something over from 'em - sure; spread ones own influence - okay; but this wikileaks shit looks outright idiotic.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
jord
Member
+2,382|6918|The North, beyond the wall.
Why must someone profit from it? Whistleblowers usually do it to further freedom of information and get the truth out there or for notoriety and personal fame. Wikileaks is a platform for them to air what they wish to "leak". There is no conspiracy to profit from leaks most of the time.

With this and the Korea situation it's going to be an interesting few news weeks, jolly good.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6651|'Murka

AussieReaper wrote:

It's reassuring to note how concerned the Middle East region really is with Iran and it's nuclear ambitions. I was a little shocked though that the Saudis wanted a military strike on Iran.
Why is that shocking? The GCC countries have been at the head of the charge to get Iran's nuke program shut down.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6841|132 and Bush

You had to know something interesting would come out of the quarter million diplomatic cables that WikiLeaks just, well, leaked late on Sunday, and the New York Times has picked out a doozie for us. As it turns out, that big brouhaha in China surrounding the hacking of Gmail accounts was actually a state-authorized attack. Such was the report from a Chinese informant working for the US embassy, and the disclosure goes on to say that it was part of a "coordinated campaign of computer sabotage," reaching a wide net of targets, including American government machines, American private businesses, and... the Dalai Lama. Hey, China's hardly the first country to ever engage in state-sponsored cyber espionage (ahem, Stuxnet), but we can't say we're not disappointed. Let's keep it classy from here on out, alright guys?
Well we knew it was China. We (the public) weren't sure it was state sponsored though.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6651|'Murka

Kmar wrote:

You had to know something interesting would come out of the quarter million diplomatic cables that WikiLeaks just, well, leaked late on Sunday, and the New York Times has picked out a doozie for us. As it turns out, that big brouhaha in China surrounding the hacking of Gmail accounts was actually a state-authorized attack. Such was the report from a Chinese informant working for the US embassy, and the disclosure goes on to say that it was part of a "coordinated campaign of computer sabotage," reaching a wide net of targets, including American government machines, American private businesses, and... the Dalai Lama. Hey, China's hardly the first country to ever engage in state-sponsored cyber espionage (ahem, Stuxnet), but we can't say we're not disappointed. Let's keep it classy from here on out, alright guys?
Well we knew it was China. We (the public) weren't sure it was state sponsored though.
Interesting. Has someone claimed definitive proof that Stuxnet is state-sponsored? I know the theory du jour is that it's Israeli at this point, but I haven't seen anything more than circumstantial conjecture.

As for this disclosure from Wikileaks, it appears to be an attempt to embarrass, rather than an attempt to "shed light" on some nefarious activity like the previous disclosures. The gist of the reports thus far seem to be focused on assessments by embassy staffs/country teams regarding various world leaders that might be embarrassing for them and/or the US...but nothing that would be considered "wrong".

Just Assange trolling, essentially. Again.

But perhaps there could actually be some goodness to come from this. The "revelations" regarding Saudi's concerns about Iran (shows it's not just a US-Israeli cabal a la Dilbert's wet dreams) and China's state-sponsored hackfest, among others. For some reason, people will believe it when it comes from Wikileaks, but not when they read it elsewhere...
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
13rin
Member
+977|6719
Why a PFC has access to all that is beyond me..  Is it not unusual to have a peon with such wide access?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Shahter
Zee Ruskie
+295|7015|Moscow, Russia

jord wrote:

Whistleblowers usually do it to further freedom of information and get the truth out there or for notoriety and personal fame.
/facepalm
you do beleave that, don't you?
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6915|Canberra, AUS
Was interesting but utterly unsurprising to see that Arab states are also shitting their pants of Iran. Confirmation over a fairly obvious theory IMO.

Last edited by Spark (2010-11-29 05:09:29)

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Shocking
sorry you feel that way
+333|6239|...
After 9/11 the US gov made it easier for military and intelligence personell to access classified documents to improve overall efficiency, sadly because of this that decision probably has to be reverted.

Shahter wrote:

/facepalm
you do beleave that, don't you?
Except for having wikileaks gain international notoriety and that PFC going into jail for the rest of his life there's not really anyone who 'profits' from all of this.

If anything, it's damaging to diplomatic relations all across the globe - not only those of the US but inbetween other countries aswell.

Assange claiming to be a pacifist is doing awfully much to try and spark wars, pretty much clear that the man is a complete moron.
inane little opines
jord
Member
+2,382|6918|The North, beyond the wall.

Shahter wrote:

jord wrote:

Whistleblowers usually do it to further freedom of information and get the truth out there or for notoriety and personal fame.
/facepalm
you do beleave that, don't you?
The guy is making no profit from this, so what other motive do you think he's leaked this for?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard