Spidery_Yoda wrote:
Harry Potter missed out almost the entire Dumbledore's past sub-plot but aside from that it was pretty faithful. Makes a change.
One thing that did bother me was Spoiler (highlight to read):
when they were caught by the snatchers. It was pretty much the only thing they changed and the way they did it made no sense at all. Why did they run away from them for ages instead of just disapperating? How did the snatchers know where they were in the first place? In the film it looks like they just happened to appear in the middle of a group of them.
Another thing (that is actually a problem with the 6th film) was that completely pointless part where the Weasely house got blown up and exploded everywhere halfway through the 6th film. It wasn't in the book and it happened for no reason at all. And then there in the 7th film it's perfectly fine and sitting there as always. Why do they change things like this. Oh well.
On the whole I thought the 7th film was a big improvement over the others and wish they'd spend more screen time on the others as well instead of making them all rushed messes.
I think theyre going to introduce it in the second movie. Thats when most of it occurs in the book too.
If I remember correctly, only Hermione is able to disapparate, thats why they have to hold on to her whenever they do it.
And that wasnt the full Weasley house, you can tell its about 1/10th the size of the old one. It looks like they just rebuilt it in the new one. I dont get why they blew it up either but its not just magically rebuilt (though they could do that
)