Not really, all the weapons in BF2 are pretty balanced, even with all the nerfs. I hope they'll go back to the bf2 weapon style instead of the BC2 style. Like, with more unlocks. The small amount of weapon options in BF2 allowed for very strategic use. I'd rather have a smallish amount of weapons and one or two unlocks per class than a ton of weapons with limits, because some weapons are bound to go obsolete, and I'd be pissed if I had to wait forever to use a barrett or some other popular weapon because people are hogging it.Trotskygrad wrote:
and we totally need weapon limits in BF3thepilot91 wrote:
true that , it's battlefield , not CODjord wrote:
There's no logic in punishing players because they enjoy a particular vehicle or kit. In the food chain, infantry are at the bottom, and they should always be.
If you don't like vehicles or a particular class then don't play it, but don't bitch about it. It's not like there's one jet for every man...
And a lot of times, short term solutions lead to long term problems. Wwith weapon limits and a ton of weapons that people ccan use no matter what army they're in, in the short term weekend warriors and new players would love the weapon variety. In the long term people would start to bitch that the weapons they have the best feel for are always taken already and each team's strategies would be practically the samecause they had access to the same weapons. With the bf2 system, people will run out of new weapons to try in the short term and bitch cause it takes them forever to get unlocks, butin the long term the weapon choices will affect which team they play as and their style. Each team needs indigenous weapons, as well.
Last edited by Acerider (2010-10-25 08:33:37)
