Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


http://www.vhemt.org/
I do like the Church of Euthanasia.

That's beside the point though.  Too much of the world already breeds like rabbits.  My choice not to breed is already made up for by the average Pakistani couple by about a factor of 7.
So what?
So, I'd like to spare the world the excesses of having kids when there are too many people here to begin with.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Why is it always the people that say they don't want kids who try to change the world? Who are they trying to change the world for? It makes zero sense. If you're not going to have kids go skydive every day until your chute doesn't open. Go out with a bang. Why drag it out.
Because the point of living has nothing to do with having kids.  It has to do with making sure people in general live better in the future.

That means keeping population growth sustainable.
jord
Member
+2,382|6963|The North, beyond the wall.
Wanting to live life is arguably the main reason westerners don't breed until the oppurtune time. Who wants a kid at 23?

Live fast die young, sex, drugs and rock n roll, etc.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Why is it always the people that say they don't want kids who try to change the world? Who are they trying to change the world for? It makes zero sense. If you're not going to have kids go skydive every day until your chute doesn't open. Go out with a bang. Why drag it out.
Because the point of living has nothing to do with having kids.  It has to do with making sure people in general live better in the future.

That means keeping population growth sustainable.
If you're not doing it for your own kids, what do you care?

The point of living is most certainly to pass on your genetic code. Hate to break it to you.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Ticia
Member
+73|5620
I'm thinking about how cool would be if instead of praising welfare moms they were giving money to everyone who doesn't want to have kids. I would ask more than £200 though.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Why is it always the people that say they don't want kids who try to change the world? Who are they trying to change the world for? It makes zero sense. If you're not going to have kids go skydive every day until your chute doesn't open. Go out with a bang. Why drag it out.
Because the point of living has nothing to do with having kids.  It has to do with making sure people in general live better in the future.

That means keeping population growth sustainable.
If you're not doing it for your own kids, what do you care?

The point of living is most certainly to pass on your genetic code. Hate to break it to you.
Your instincts tell you that, but we don't have to behave as animals.

I care about humanity in general.  I don't have any attachment to the concept of creating a progeny of my own because it's not about me -- it's about society.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Ticia wrote:

I'm thinking about how cool would be if instead of praising welfare moms they were giving money to everyone who doesn't want to have kids. I would ask more than £200 though.
Não mais portugueses para iluminar o mundo?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Because the point of living has nothing to do with having kids.  It has to do with making sure people in general live better in the future.

That means keeping population growth sustainable.
If you're not doing it for your own kids, what do you care?

The point of living is most certainly to pass on your genetic code. Hate to break it to you.
Your instincts tell you that, but we don't have to behave as animals.

I care about humanity in general.  I don't have any attachment to the concept of creating a progeny of my own because it's not about me -- it's about society.
My instincts tell me that the world generally sucks, that being poor fucking blows, and that the only reason I'm sticking around on this planet is so I can create a better world for the kids I do want to have? Kids are a joy man, not a burden.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Ticia
Member
+73|5620

JohnG@lt wrote:

Ticia wrote:

I'm thinking about how cool would be if instead of praising welfare moms they were giving money to everyone who doesn't want to have kids. I would ask more than £200 though.
Não mais portugueses para iluminar o mundo?
Os meus filhos seriam os donos dos teus,Galt.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Ticia wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Ticia wrote:

I'm thinking about how cool would be if instead of praising welfare moms they were giving money to everyone who doesn't want to have kids. I would ask more than £200 though.
Não mais portugueses para iluminar o mundo?
Os meus filhos seriam os donos dos teus,Galt.



Edit - Mas a mina será mais bonita

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-10-19 09:09:40)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
EVieira
Member
+105|6763|Lutenblaag, Molvania

Turquoise wrote:

EVieira wrote:

Ticia wrote:

It's completely immoral to breed when you don't have means to support the kid. That ok though because in the long run they'll all get raised...in some shithole where they'll be abused and addicted before age 6.  But hey that's good livin', right?
If you are a heroin addict you should not have kids, I completely agree with you on that. And so should people without high school degrees who live in shacks and already have 6 children.

The immoral thing is offer money to a heroin addict money in exchange for sterilization. You could throw in an extra $50 and graft some skin off his back for a burn victim and he'd do it too.


Here in Brazil, public health offers anyone sterilization procedures for free. (well not for free since we pay an absurd of taxes, but that's another issue...).
It's not immoral.  It's practical.
Its practical, no doubt about that. But in reality, when you offer a heroin addict money for a sterilization you're just giving him one more fix in exchange for him being neutered. THAT'S what makes it immoral.

Last edited by EVieira (2010-10-19 09:09:59)

"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
Ticia
Member
+73|5620

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


If you're not doing it for your own kids, what do you care?

The point of living is most certainly to pass on your genetic code. Hate to break it to you.
Your instincts tell you that, but we don't have to behave as animals.

I care about humanity in general.  I don't have any attachment to the concept of creating a progeny of my own because it's not about me -- it's about society.
My instincts tell me that the world generally sucks, that being poor fucking blows, and that the only reason I'm sticking around on this planet is so I can create a better world for the kids I do want to have? Kids are a joy man, not a burden.
Aww, what a sweetie.
jord
Member
+2,382|6963|The North, beyond the wall.

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


If you're not doing it for your own kids, what do you care?

The point of living is most certainly to pass on your genetic code. Hate to break it to you.
Your instincts tell you that, but we don't have to behave as animals.

I care about humanity in general.  I don't have any attachment to the concept of creating a progeny of my own because it's not about me -- it's about society.
My instincts tell me that the world generally sucks, that being poor fucking blows, and that the only reason I'm sticking around on this planet is so I can create a better world for the kids I do want to have? Kids are a joy man, not a burden.
Depends, I'm forced to be in contact with a kid with adhd. Soul destroyingly annoying, as bad as that sounds...
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

EVieira wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

EVieira wrote:


If you are a heroin addict you should not have kids, I completely agree with you on that. And so should people without high school degrees who live in shacks and already have 6 children.

The immoral thing is offer money to a heroin addict money in exchange for sterilization. You could throw in an extra $50 and graft some skin off his back for a burn victim and he'd do it too.


Here in Brazil, public health offers anyone sterilization procedures for free. (well not for free since we pay an absurd of taxes, but that's another issue...).
It's not immoral.  It's practical.
Its practical, no doubt about that. But in reality, when you offer a heroin addict money for a sterilization you're just giving him one more fix in exchange for him being neutered. THAT'S what makes it immoral.
/thread
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Ticia
Member
+73|5620

JohnG@lt wrote:

Ticia wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


Não mais portugueses para iluminar o mundo?
Os meus filhos seriam os donos dos teus,Galt.



Edit - Mas a mina será mais bonita

Online translation is a bitch,eh?
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Ticia wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Ticia wrote:


Os meus filhos seriam os donos dos teus,Galt.



Edit - Mas a mina será mais bonita

Online translation is a bitch,eh?
Like I said before, why would I ever want to learn Portuguese when Spanish is so much more useful
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


If you're not doing it for your own kids, what do you care?

The point of living is most certainly to pass on your genetic code. Hate to break it to you.
Your instincts tell you that, but we don't have to behave as animals.

I care about humanity in general.  I don't have any attachment to the concept of creating a progeny of my own because it's not about me -- it's about society.
My instincts tell me that the world generally sucks, that being poor fucking blows, and that the only reason I'm sticking around on this planet is so I can create a better world for the kids I do want to have? Kids are a joy man, not a burden.
That's your choice, Galt.  Admittedly, you do take the more common route of choosing to breed.  However, to help your kids along, I'm choosing not to, so that they can have a little more in resources to use later on.

It's only logical that the most prosperous cultures die out in terms of breeding.  They serve their purpose in the economic food chain as the poorer societies catch up.  However, since poor will always exist, there is no fear of our species dying out due to a lack of interest in breeding.

We have much bigger threats to our existence such as nuclear war, meteors, seismic cataclysms, global warming, and pollution in general.

Breeding will always be more than compensated for.
Acerider
Stupid keyboard is stuck
+32|5295|Ontario, Canada

jord wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Your instincts tell you that, but we don't have to behave as animals.

I care about humanity in general.  I don't have any attachment to the concept of creating a progeny of my own because it's not about me -- it's about society.
My instincts tell me that the world generally sucks, that being poor fucking blows, and that the only reason I'm sticking around on this planet is so I can create a better world for the kids I do want to have? Kids are a joy man, not a burden.
Depends, I'm forced to be in contact with a kid with adhd. Soul destroyingly annoying, as bad as that sounds...
You're overreacting, kids with ADHD aren't that bad. Besides, with people telling them they suck or they're retarded all the time, they get incredibly depressed and continue their behaviour causeit'sall they know. Get the kid Ritalin. If it doesn't work, use Concerta.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

EVieira wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

EVieira wrote:


If you are a heroin addict you should not have kids, I completely agree with you on that. And so should people without high school degrees who live in shacks and already have 6 children.

The immoral thing is offer money to a heroin addict money in exchange for sterilization. You could throw in an extra $50 and graft some skin off his back for a burn victim and he'd do it too.


Here in Brazil, public health offers anyone sterilization procedures for free. (well not for free since we pay an absurd of taxes, but that's another issue...).
It's not immoral.  It's practical.
Its practical, no doubt about that. But in reality, when you offer a heroin addict money for a sterilization you're just giving him one more fix in exchange for him being neutered. THAT'S what makes it immoral.
I also support euthanasia.  If he wants to overdose and die...  that's on him, not me.
EVieira
Member
+105|6763|Lutenblaag, Molvania

Turquoise wrote:

EVieira wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


It's not immoral.  It's practical.
Its practical, no doubt about that. But in reality, when you offer a heroin addict money for a sterilization you're just giving him one more fix in exchange for him being neutered. THAT'S what makes it immoral.
I also support euthanasia.  If he wants to overdose and die...  that's on him, not me.
Fine, but would you offer him money to do so? Or provide the needles and drugs?
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England
Off to class, have fun ladies.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Acerider
Stupid keyboard is stuck
+32|5295|Ontario, Canada

Turquoise wrote:

EVieira wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


It's not immoral.  It's practical.
Its practical, no doubt about that. But in reality, when you offer a heroin addict money for a sterilization you're just giving him one more fix in exchange for him being neutered. THAT'S what makes it immoral.
I also support euthanasia.  If he wants to overdose and die...  that's on him, not me.
You still should try to help someone from destroying themselves. If they don't listen and continue to destroy themselves,keep trying to help themuntil you succeed or until they destroy themselves.
jord
Member
+2,382|6963|The North, beyond the wall.

Acerider wrote:

jord wrote:

JohnG@lt wrote:


My instincts tell me that the world generally sucks, that being poor fucking blows, and that the only reason I'm sticking around on this planet is so I can create a better world for the kids I do want to have? Kids are a joy man, not a burden.
Depends, I'm forced to be in contact with a kid with adhd. Soul destroyingly annoying, as bad as that sounds...
You're overreacting, kids with ADHD aren't that bad. Besides, with people telling them they suck or they're retarded all the time, they get incredibly depressed and continue their behaviour causeit'sall they know. Get the kid Ritalin. If it doesn't work, use Concerta.
I'm not overeacting at all. The kid is annoying as hell and I hence labelled him as annoying...
Acerider
Stupid keyboard is stuck
+32|5295|Ontario, Canada

jord wrote:

Acerider wrote:

jord wrote:


Depends, I'm forced to be in contact with a kid with adhd. Soul destroyingly annoying, as bad as that sounds...
You're overreacting, kids with ADHD aren't that bad. Besides, with people telling them they suck or they're retarded all the time, they get incredibly depressed and continue their behaviour causeit'sall they know. Get the kid Ritalin. If it doesn't work, use Concerta.
I'm not overeacting at all. The kid is annoying as hell and I hence labelled him as annoying...
Oh. Sorry. Does he try to be unnannoying?

Spoiler (highlight to read):
Aand does this kid happen to be someone posting in this thread?
jord
Member
+2,382|6963|The North, beyond the wall.

Acerider wrote:

jord wrote:

Acerider wrote:


You're overreacting, kids with ADHD aren't that bad. Besides, with people telling them they suck or they're retarded all the time, they get incredibly depressed and continue their behaviour causeit'sall they know. Get the kid Ritalin. If it doesn't work, use Concerta.
I'm not overeacting at all. The kid is annoying as hell and I hence labelled him as annoying...
Oh. Sorry. Does he try to be unnannoying?

Spoiler (highlight to read):
Aand does this kid happen to be someone posting in this thread?
No I was talking about a rl kid. Nice of you to assume I was talking about you though, lawl.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard