Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7095|Nårvei

Uzique wrote:

there's no difference between the small batshit insane cults we have today and the multitude of small batshit cults they had back then.

the only difference is that a few of them hit the bigtime and became institutionalized with political-favour and, in turn, power.
The reason for starting a cult, sect or religion haven't changed I agree ... but I don't think level of stupidity has changed much either ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
DesertFox-
The very model of a modern major general
+796|6969|United States of America
I reckon you might be able to use the square-rectangle argument for this, insomuch as a cult is often a far out religious group, but not all religions are cults (although you wouldn't know it from the way people talk on this forum).
jord
Member
+2,382|6963|The North, beyond the wall.

Varegg wrote:

Uzique wrote:

there's no difference between the small batshit insane cults we have today and the multitude of small batshit cults they had back then.

the only difference is that a few of them hit the bigtime and became institutionalized with political-favour and, in turn, power.
The reason for starting a cult, sect or religion haven't changed I agree ... but I don't think level of stupidity has changed much either ...
People are far more skepital and cynical nowadays, what with freedom of speech and modern media.

Questioning religion or being a heathen has gone from being lynched and punishable by death, to being looked down upon by the majority and shunned, to being more accepted, to being completely accepted and growing in numbers with every generation.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5522|Cleveland, Ohio

jord wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Uzique wrote:

there's no difference between the small batshit insane cults we have today and the multitude of small batshit cults they had back then.

the only difference is that a few of them hit the bigtime and became institutionalized with political-favour and, in turn, power.
The reason for starting a cult, sect or religion haven't changed I agree ... but I don't think level of stupidity has changed much either ...
People are far more skepital and cynical nowadays, what with freedom of speech and modern media.

Questioning religion or being a heathen has gone from being lynched and punishable by death, to being looked down upon by the majority and shunned, to being more accepted, to being completely accepted and growing in numbers with every generation.
agree.  plus we can explain things now like a volcano is not because the man in the sky is angry.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina
Religions are popular cults.

Every religion begins as a "cult", because this is a label given to religions that don't have many followers or are unpopular upstarts in a given time period.
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7095|Nårvei

jord wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Uzique wrote:

there's no difference between the small batshit insane cults we have today and the multitude of small batshit cults they had back then.

the only difference is that a few of them hit the bigtime and became institutionalized with political-favour and, in turn, power.
The reason for starting a cult, sect or religion haven't changed I agree ... but I don't think level of stupidity has changed much either ...
People are far more skepital and cynical nowadays, what with freedom of speech and modern media.

Questioning religion or being a heathen has gone from being lynched and punishable by death, to being looked down upon by the majority and shunned, to being more accepted, to being completely accepted and growing in numbers with every generation.
That explains why less people are religious today but then again we are back to the point of what kind of people joins a sect or a cult ... if your thesis is correct it would mean people are actually in these enlightened times more stupid to join than they were 2000 years ago while normal religion attracts less people ...

Or do you think that in earlier times they trusted their educated much more seeing as there were so few of them ... so if an educated "priest" said the volcano erupted because it was Gods will he was more likely to be believed than a similar incident today ...

Again I stress the point that lack of education doesn't default being stupid ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
NAthANSmitt
Stud
+4|6414
A cult is a organization that has a charismatic leader that leads a form of religious service. It may or may not also be very harmful to the members. They are smaller more exclusive organizations also.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX

NAthANSmitt wrote:

A cult is a organization that has a charismatic leader that leads a form of religious service. It may or may not also be very harmful to the members. They are smaller more exclusive organizations also.
Like Apple.
Fuck Israel
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6755

Dilbert_X wrote:

NAthANSmitt wrote:

A cult is a organization that has a charismatic leader that leads a form of religious service. It may or may not also be very harmful to the members. They are smaller more exclusive organizations also.
Like Apple.
or the Democratic Party
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|6998|Purplicious Wisconsin

11 Bravo wrote:

so basically its too late to start another popular religion because of evolution?
Have you forgotten Scientology which is stupidly considered a religion?

Last edited by War Man (2010-09-07 16:41:34)

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5522|Cleveland, Ohio

War Man wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

so basically its too late to start another popular religion because of evolution?
Have you forgotten Scientology which is stupidly considered a religion?
how is that different than any other religion?
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|6900|do not disturb

NAthANSmitt wrote:

A cult is a organization that has a charismatic leader that leads a form of religious service. It may or may not also be very harmful to the members. They are smaller more exclusive organizations also.
Good answer. You should post more often stranger :b

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard