Poll

The Founders of the proposed Mosque are Honest T/F ?

Yes - trying to spread peace understanding !73%73% - 17
No - trying to Create a Trophy to jihad !26%26% - 6
Total: 23
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6343
How many people think the Founders / Backers etc of the proposed N.Y.C. mosque are being altruistic and pure of heart in their intention of building a mosque / Y.M.M.A. or whatever its gonna be ?

Just a thought. Not challenging legal or moral authority to Do So.

Rate your Guess =100 to -100

Yes They are trying to spread peace understanding and the Word of allah   = +100

No They are trying to Create a Trophy to their jihad = - 100

You can explian your view, opinion, obsevation, geuss, feeling, decision  etc. if you feel the need.


If you feel you are stating Facts Try hard to back them up, OK

Just curious. .  .    .    .

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2010-09-05 06:25:34)

Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5739|شمال
We have enough threads about the Hamas/Hizbullah/Alqaeda-LINKED, ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST mega mosque that is going to be a terror command center.
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5347|London, England

Beduin wrote:

We have enough threads about the Hamas/Hizbullah/Alqaeda-LINKED, ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST mega mosque that is going to be a terror command center.
One has to wonder how many of these people with such strong opinions ever volunteered to serve. Pussy ass flag waving chickenhawks the vast majority of them.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6705
they have imams in us army. oh noes hajji taking over mah military
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|5950|Places 'n such
isnt that thing just a community centre with a tiny mosque in it?
If so thats like trying to close down a hospital because it has a chapel...
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
jord
Member
+2,382|6667|The North, beyond the wall.
It's starting to pain me. I can't wait until this whole non-story is over and we can all move on to something equally as pointless.
mafia996630
© 2009 Jeff Minard
+319|6752|d

Beduin wrote:

We have enough threads about the Hamas/Hizbullah/Alqaeda-LINKED, ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST mega mosque that is going to be a terror command center.
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6343

mafia996630 wrote:

Beduin wrote:

We have enough threads about the Hamas/Hizbullah/Alqaeda-LINKED, ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST mega mosque that is going to be a terror command center.
Actually if you had read it it is only asking for (YOUR) take on the
Backers etc of the proposed N.Y.C. mosque are being ARE THEY being
altruistic and pure of heart in their intention
of building a mosque / Y.M.M.A. or whatever its gonna be ? Not Should it be allowed is it wrong legal etc.

is English a second language here ?
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6442|The Twilight Zone
Unless its Osama who's founding the mosque they are not trying to make this a trophy for jihad. Not the best way of making a poll
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6343

JohnG@lt wrote:

Beduin wrote:

We have enough threads about the Hamas/Hizbullah/Alqaeda-LINKED, ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST mega mosque that is going to be a terror command center.
One has to wonder how many of these people with such strong opinions ever volunteered to serve. Pussy ass flag waving chickenhawks the vast majority of them.
What poster shows " a strong opinion " here, ? Who " waved a Flag " ?

  Are you seeing something or reading something we can't ?

    Have you slept yet ? perhaps not.

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2010-09-05 09:08:56)

mafia996630
© 2009 Jeff Minard
+319|6752|d

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:

Beduin wrote:

We have enough threads about the Hamas/Hizbullah/Alqaeda-LINKED, ISLAMIC SUPREMACIST mega mosque that is going to be a terror command center.
Actually if you had read it it is only asking for (YOUR) take on the
Backers etc of the proposed N.Y.C. mosque are being ARE THEY being
altruistic and pure of heart in their intention
of building a mosque / Y.M.M.A. or whatever its gonna be ? Not Should it be allowed is it wrong legal etc.

is English a second language here ?
Do we even know who the backers are ?
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6457

mafia996630 wrote:

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:


Actually if you had read it it is only asking for (YOUR) take on the
Backers etc of the proposed N.Y.C. mosque are being ARE THEY being
altruistic and pure of heart in their intention
of building a mosque / Y.M.M.A. or whatever its gonna be ? Not Should it be allowed is it wrong legal etc.

is English a second language here ?
Do we even know who the backers are ?
The biggest one is one of the co-owners of News Corp.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6394|North Carolina
Null vote.  A significant portion of the funding of this community center is from Prince Alwaleed bin Talal -- one of the most significant owners of Fox News Corporation.

This particular backer hasn't been that honest, but neither has his media company.

In short, the community center would already be operating shortly if right wing media hadn't generated a big controversy over it.  As things currently stand, Talal profits either way.  He makes money from the hysteria of Fox News through ratings.

It is still rather humorous to see right wingers jump to anger like the good little pawns they've allowed themselves to become though.
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6343

Turquoise wrote:

Null vote.  A significant portion of the funding of this community center is from Prince Alwaleed bin Talal -- one of the most significant owners of Fox News Corporation.

This particular backer hasn't been that honest, but neither has his media company.

In short, the community center would already be operating shortly if right wing media hadn't generated a big controversy over it.  As things currently stand, Talal profits either way.  He makes money from the hysteria of Fox News through ratings.

It is still rather humorous to see right wingers jump to anger like the good little pawns they've allowed themselves to become though.
I never see this " hysteria " You talk about ? I see people and hear both sides. When I see a crowd shot from a low angle I assume their trying to make it look bigger. When they say buzz words like " Hate - Fear - Hysteria and their favorite - Racist " I assume they want to De-legitimize something or some view point.  The mass media has lost almost all it's credibility with me on almost any topic save local weather and that ain't so hot either.  I don't Consider some one who feels " Chills run up his leg ! " when some one stutters in front of him as a reliable source. You do not feel the same apparently.

Turquoise wrote:

right wing media hadn't generated a big controversy over it.
There is not a lot of Media that couldn't be called left wing.

They had a Political Litmus test here way back. ( it was a bit clunky ) it plotted you on an ordinate and abscissa - Socialist - Conservative - Liberal Etc.
I Feel Very Strongly Right wing but I was only +0.5 +0.5 Jut Right of Dead center. Everyone who Railed against me was - 90 - 95 Way in the lower Left corner of  the graph. Maybe Fox News just says things you don't like to hear ?

For example. They reported on the Gulf Oil Spill, But They didn't go on and on about how much obama cares

" it's obviuos that he really cares "
like all the other networks I watched. Does that make them Right wing or just not as Far Left as all the others ?   

With that thought in mind I'd be care full about accusing people you never really met of being ~

Turquoise wrote:

" - good little pawns they've allowed themselves to become "-
as It might apply elsewhere.

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2010-09-06 16:09:22)

11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5226|Cleveland, Ohio
just so yall understand...by supporting this whatever it is you support fox news.  win.  ahahahahahahahahaha
jord
Member
+2,382|6667|The North, beyond the wall.

11 Bravo wrote:

just so yall understand...by supporting this whatever it is you support fox news.  win.  ahahahahahahahahaha
What if you don't give a shit either way about this non issue that affects nobody and yet still think fox news is a piss poor "media" outlet?

Win ahahahaha. Not that anybody "wins" anything here.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6394|North Carolina

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

I never see this " hysteria " You talk about ? I see people and hear both sides. When I see a crowd shot from a low angle I assume their trying to make it look bigger. When they say buzz words like " Hate - Fear - Hysteria and their favorite - Racist " I assume they want to De-legitimize something or some view point.  The mass media has lost almost all it's credibility with me on almost any topic save local weather and that ain't so hot either.  I don't Consider some one who feels " Chills run up his leg ! " when some one stutters in front of him as a reliable source. You do not feel the same apparently.
Sensationalism was the source of this controversy.  There was no big deal about this community center until outlets like Fox News spun the story.

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

There is not a lot of Media that couldn't be called left wing.

They had a Political Litmus test here way back. ( it was a bit clunky ) it plotted you on an ordinate and abscissa - Socialist - Conservative - Liberal Etc.
I Feel Very Strongly Right wing but I was only +0.5 +0.5 Jut Right of Dead center. Everyone who Railed against me was - 90 - 95 Way in the lower Left corner of  the graph. Maybe Fox News just says things you don't like to hear ?
It must've been a pretty slanted test.

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

For example. They reported on the Gulf Oil Spill, But They didn't go on and on about how much obama cares

" it's obviuos that he really cares "
like all the other networks I watched. Does that make them Right wing or just not as Far Left as all the others ?   

With that thought in mind I'd be care full about accusing people you never really met of being ~

Turquoise wrote:

" - good little pawns they've allowed themselves to become "-
as It might apply elsewhere.
Well, if you're looking for bias, I'm sure you'll find it.  Many conservatives have a knack for reading into anything media related as having a liberal bias.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,810|6095|eXtreme to the maX
Thats enough mosque threads.
Русский военный корабль, иди на хуй!
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6394|North Carolina

11 Bravo wrote:

just so yall understand...by supporting this whatever it is you support fox news.  win.  ahahahahahahahahaha
No, we just support the freedom of religion, property rights, and coincidentally...  Talal's pet project. 
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5226|Cleveland, Ohio

Turquoise wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

just so yall understand...by supporting this whatever it is you support fox news.  win.  ahahahahahahahahaha
No, we just support the freedom of religion, property rights, and coincidentally...  fox news's pet project. 
fxt
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6394|North Carolina

11 Bravo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

just so yall understand...by supporting this whatever it is you support fox news.  win.  ahahahahahahahahaha
No, we just support the freedom of religion, property rights, and coincidentally...  fox news's pet project. 
fxt
Talal owns Fox, not the other way around.
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5226|Cleveland, Ohio

Turquoise wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


No, we just support the freedom of religion, property rights, and coincidentally...  fox news's pet project. 
fxt
Talal owns Fox, not the other way around.
yes but people are bashing fox.  god forbid they bash a brown person.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6394|North Carolina

11 Bravo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

fxt
Talal owns Fox, not the other way around.
yes but people are bashing fox.  god forbid they bash a brown person.
Well, bashing one of your owners seems pretty weird (as in what Fox is indirectly doing).

Last edited by Turquoise (2010-09-06 17:11:12)

11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5226|Cleveland, Ohio

Turquoise wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Talal owns Fox, not the other way around.
yes but people are bashing fox.  god forbid they bash a brown person.
Well, bashing one of your owners seems pretty weird (as in what Fox is indirectly doing).
no no turq.  i mean the muppets on this forum.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6394|North Carolina

11 Bravo wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:


yes but people are bashing fox.  god forbid they bash a brown person.
Well, bashing one of your owners seems pretty weird (as in what Fox is indirectly doing).
no no turq.  i mean the muppets on this forum.
If it's any consolation, I have no problem with bashing extremists -- regardless of their skin pigment.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard