cl4u53w1t2
Salon-Bolschewist
+269|6758|Kakanien
well, these problems are partially caused by the us:

"Firearm-related violence across the border has skyrocketed recently in bloody battles between Mexican drug cartels and Mexican authorities, resulting in the slaughter of police officers, soldiers, judges, prosecutors, reporters and innocent bystanders. Because Mexico's strict gun laws make it extremely difficult for civilians to purchase firearms, the increasing gun violence raises an obvious question: Where are the drug cartels buying their guns? Unfortunately, they're buying them right here in the United States.

According to a report issued by the U.S. State Department on Feb. 27, more than 5,000 people were killed in the Mexican drug wars in 2008. The report states that Mexican authorities seized nearly 40,000 illegal firearms in 2008 and that 95 percent of the guns traced were purchased in the United States. Not surprisingly, the escalating violence has begun to spill over into this country.

The reason Mexican drug lords look to America for their guns is clear: In most states they can easily buy guns, including assault weapons and .50-caliber rifles, from private sellers without a background check, no questions asked. Gun sales in Mexico, in contrast, are strictly regulated, as they are in other industrialized nations outside of the United States. The reason shady gun dealers and private sellers here are willing to supply the illegal Mexican market is also clear: It is a highly lucrative business and our gun laws make it unlikely that they will ever get caught."

http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNL … hbxlogin=1
krazed
Admiral of the Bathtub
+619|7065|Great Brown North
lol at assault weapons used once again


"The bloodshed in Mexico and America could also be curtailed if Congress banned assault weapons and .50-caliber rifles"

when was the last time a .50 was used in a violent crime in the US?

"65 percent favor banning assault weapons"  and how many of that 65% even know what that is?


that article is a giant pile of dogshit




has mexico provided any proof that 95% of the guns used there are sold in the US? or are they still sticking to a few pictures of guns on a table
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

cl4u53w1t2 wrote:

well, these problems are partially caused by the us:

"Firearm-related violence across the border has skyrocketed recently in bloody battles between Mexican drug cartels and Mexican authorities, resulting in the slaughter of police officers, soldiers, judges, prosecutors, reporters and innocent bystanders. Because Mexico's strict gun laws make it extremely difficult for civilians to purchase firearms, the increasing gun violence raises an obvious question: Where are the drug cartels buying their guns? Unfortunately, they're buying them right here in the United States.

According to a report issued by the U.S. State Department on Feb. 27, more than 5,000 people were killed in the Mexican drug wars in 2008. The report states that Mexican authorities seized nearly 40,000 illegal firearms in 2008 and that 95 percent of the guns traced were purchased in the United States. Not surprisingly, the escalating violence has begun to spill over into this country.

The reason Mexican drug lords look to America for their guns is clear: In most states they can easily buy guns, including assault weapons and .50-caliber rifles, from private sellers without a background check, no questions asked. Gun sales in Mexico, in contrast, are strictly regulated, as they are in other industrialized nations outside of the United States. The reason shady gun dealers and private sellers here are willing to supply the illegal Mexican market is also clear: It is a highly lucrative business and our gun laws make it unlikely that they will ever get caught."

http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNL … hbxlogin=1
Ok, yes, the following link is Fox News, but I cross-referenced it, and it matches other reports.

The fact is, only 17 percent of guns found at Mexican crime scenes have been traced to the U.S.

What's true, an ATF spokeswoman told FOXNews.com, in a clarification of the statistic used by her own agency's assistant director, "is that over 90 percent of the traced firearms originate from the U.S."

But a large percentage of the guns recovered in Mexico do not get sent back to the U.S. for tracing, because it is obvious from their markings that they do not come from the U.S.

"Not every weapon seized in Mexico has a serial number on it that would make it traceable, and the U.S. effort to trace weapons really only extends to weapons that have been in the U.S. market," Matt Allen, special agent of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), told FOX News.

In 2007-2008, according to ATF Special Agent William Newell, Mexico submitted 11,000 guns to the ATF for tracing. Close to 6,000 were successfully traced -- and of those, 90 percent -- 5,114 to be exact, according to testimony in Congress by William Hoover -- were found to have come from the U.S.

But in those same two years, according to the Mexican government, 29,000 guns were recovered at crime scenes.

In other words, 68 percent of the guns that were recovered were never submitted for tracing. And when you weed out the roughly 6,000 guns that could not be traced from the remaining 32 percent, it means 83 percent of the guns found at crime scenes in Mexico could not be traced to the U.S.

So, if not from the U.S., where do they come from? There are a variety of sources:

-- The Black Market. Mexico is a virtual arms bazaar, with fragmentation grenades from South Korea, AK-47s from China, and shoulder-fired rocket launchers from Spain, Israel and former Soviet bloc manufacturers.

-- Russian crime organizations. Interpol says Russian Mafia groups such as Poldolskaya and Moscow-based Solntsevskaya are actively trafficking drugs and arms in Mexico.

- South America. During the late 1990s, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) established a clandestine arms smuggling and drug trafficking partnership with the Tijuana cartel, according to the Federal Research Division report from the Library of Congress.

-- Asia. According to a 2006 Amnesty International Report, China has provided arms to countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Chinese assault weapons and Korean explosives have been recovered in Mexico.

-- The Mexican Army. More than 150,000 soldiers deserted in the last six years, according to Mexican Congressman Robert Badillo. Many took their weapons with them, including the standard issue M-16 assault rifle made in Belgium.

-- Guatemala. U.S. intelligence agencies say traffickers move immigrants, stolen cars, guns and drugs, including most of America's cocaine, along the porous Mexican-Guatemalan border. On March 27, La Hora, a Guatemalan newspaper, reported that police seized 500 grenades and a load of AK-47s on the border. Police say the cache was transported by a Mexican drug cartel operating out of Ixcan, a border town.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04 … xico-come/

So, only a small portion of the problem stems from us.  Unfortunately, a lot of media sources have inaccurately reported 90% of guns seized by the Mexican government as having come from us, but in fact, it's only 90% of the guns they actually send to our officials that are traced back to the U.S.  That's very different from 90% of the weapons overall.

And yeah, it's going to sound weird coming from me, but I actually would suggest that one of the few legitimate claims of liberal bias in media is with regard to guns.  A lot of the MSM is gun phobic, and the majority of the U.S. population leans in favor of more gun control (even when statistics show that a lot of gun control measures are ineffective).

Last edited by Turquoise (2010-08-31 19:26:44)

Ticia
Member
+73|5620
^
If the US are being singled out is because they are the ones legally supplying the military and law enforcement the weapons supposed to fight the drug cartels that are now being used by them. Today drug trafficking organizations have a lot more than the assault riffles and pistols of the past and have turned Mexico into a war zone.

The US government full of good intentions doesn't know Calderón government cannot control the corruption inside Mexican law enforcement?  Doubtful.
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Ticia wrote:

^
If the US are being singled out is because they are the ones legally supplying the military and law enforcement the weapons supposed to fight the drug cartels that are now being used by them. Today drug trafficking organizations have a lot more than the assault riffles and pistols of the past and have turned Mexico into a war zone.

The US government full of good intentions doesn't know Calderón government cannot control the corruption inside Mexican law enforcement?  Doubtful.
Welcome back stranger.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Ticia
Member
+73|5620

JohnG@lt wrote:

Ticia wrote:

^
If the US are being singled out is because they are the ones legally supplying the military and law enforcement the weapons supposed to fight the drug cartels that are now being used by them. Today drug trafficking organizations have a lot more than the assault riffles and pistols of the past and have turned Mexico into a war zone.

The US government full of good intentions doesn't know Calderón government cannot control the corruption inside Mexican law enforcement?  Doubtful.
Welcome back stranger.
Hola 
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

Ticia wrote:

^
If the US are being singled out is because they are the ones legally supplying the military and law enforcement the weapons supposed to fight the drug cartels that are now being used by them. Today drug trafficking organizations have a lot more than the assault riffles and pistols of the past and have turned Mexico into a war zone.

The US government full of good intentions doesn't know Calderón government cannot control the corruption inside Mexican law enforcement?  Doubtful.
Well, America may end up "fixing" Mexico soon enough.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

^
If the US are being singled out is because they are the ones legally supplying the military and law enforcement the weapons supposed to fight the drug cartels that are now being used by them. Today drug trafficking organizations have a lot more than the assault riffles and pistols of the past and have turned Mexico into a war zone.

The US government full of good intentions doesn't know Calderón government cannot control the corruption inside Mexican law enforcement?  Doubtful.
Well, America may end up "fixing" Mexico soon enough.
Can you elaborate?

I doubt the current administration would do anything.  Remember Obama thinks that all these people are really just undocumented democrats.  And its not like he's doing much to help against the drug cartels when AZ asks for 3,000 Nat'l Guardsmen; gets 30 (via http://www.drudgereport.com/ ).

If Obama could annex Mexico he would do it just so they would vote for him.

Bureau of Land Management sign in Arizona, "DANGER - PUBLIC WARNING, TRAVEL NOT RECOMMENDED, Visitors May Encounter Armed Criminals and Smuggling Vehicles Traveling at High Rates of Speed."
https://img96.imageshack.us/img96/2484/32817107.jpg

Last edited by Harmor (2010-09-01 21:39:45)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina
It all depends on the escalation involved.  I don't think any party would stomach much more turmoil than we currently have at the border.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA
I'm more concerned about the inaction of our government with violence on this side of the border.  That our own government won't protect us is troubling.
jord
Member
+2,382|6963|The North, beyond the wall.

Harmor wrote:

I'm more concerned about the inaction of our government with violence on this side of the border.  That our own government won't protect us is troubling.
Aren't you in favour of small government and protecting yourself?
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7001

Harmor wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Ticia wrote:

^
If the US are being singled out is because they are the ones legally supplying the military and law enforcement the weapons supposed to fight the drug cartels that are now being used by them. Today drug trafficking organizations have a lot more than the assault riffles and pistols of the past and have turned Mexico into a war zone.

The US government full of good intentions doesn't know Calderón government cannot control the corruption inside Mexican law enforcement?  Doubtful.
Well, America may end up "fixing" Mexico soon enough.
Can you elaborate?

I doubt the current administration would do anything.  Remember Obama thinks that all these people are really just undocumented democrats.  And its not like he's doing much to help against the drug cartels when AZ asks for 3,000 Nat'l Guardsmen; gets 30 (via http://www.drudgereport.com/ ).

If Obama could annex Mexico he would do it just so they would vote for him.

Bureau of Land Management sign in Arizona, "DANGER - PUBLIC WARNING, TRAVEL NOT RECOMMENDED, Visitors May Encounter Armed Criminals and Smuggling Vehicles Traveling at High Rates of Speed."
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/2484/32817107.jpg
That doesn't make sense at all. The Governor is in charge for the National Guard in the state.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Ticia
Member
+73|5620

Harmor wrote:

I'm more concerned about the inaction of our government with violence on this side of the border.  That our own government won't protect us is troubling.
If the US wanted to bomb all the drug cartels and clean up Mexico crime they could and with more support of the international community than they have in Afghanistan.
But the government knows being neighbours with a country at war is no fun,staying out is the best decision right now.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7001

Ticia wrote:

Harmor wrote:

I'm more concerned about the inaction of our government with violence on this side of the border.  That our own government won't protect us is troubling.
If the US wanted to bomb all the drug cartels and clean up Mexico crime they could and with more support of the international community than they have in Afghanistan.
But the government knows being neighbours with a country at war is no fun,staying out is the best decision right now.
No you'd have a lot of people in Latin America calling this shit racist. Like yeah America is full of white people

Last edited by Cybargs (2010-09-02 08:06:06)

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA
This is getting more ugly:

https://img291.imageshack.us/img291/5972/storyd.jpg
Mexican Gunmen Fire at Border Patrol Agents via http://www.drudgereport.com/

I wonder if our Border Patrol Agents are even allowed to defend themselves.  And of course they can't even be in their vehicles sometimes because it might 'harm the environment' so they are even less protected.

If any agents die because the regulations here I'll blame Obama.
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6433|'straya

Harmor wrote:

I wonder if our Border Patrol Agents are even allowed to defend themselves. .

THE ARTICLE YOU POSTED wrote:

"The agents returned fire several times forcing the gunmen in Mexico to flee. No injuries were reported."
That leads me to believe that the Border Patrol Agents ARE allowed to defend themselves. Or maybe it just my crazy "liberal" mind mis reading the article.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

Harmor wrote:

I wonder if our Border Patrol Agents are even allowed to defend themselves. .

THE ARTICLE YOU POSTED wrote:

"The agents returned fire several times forcing the gunmen in Mexico to flee. No injuries were reported."
That leads me to believe that the Border Patrol Agents ARE allowed to defend themselves. Or maybe it just my crazy "liberal" mind mis reading the article.
Sorry, I meant in general, not this specific event where they did return fire.
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6433|'straya
Yes bet "specific events" are often indicative of the overarching policies (or in this case ROE).
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA
We only need to look at the cartels that have taken parts of Arizona hostage as an example of the lax ROE this administration has torwards illegal traffickers of both people and drugs.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

Cybargs wrote:

Ticia wrote:

Harmor wrote:

I'm more concerned about the inaction of our government with violence on this side of the border.  That our own government won't protect us is troubling.
If the US wanted to bomb all the drug cartels and clean up Mexico crime they could and with more support of the international community than they have in Afghanistan.
But the government knows being neighbours with a country at war is no fun,staying out is the best decision right now.
No you'd have a lot of people in Latin America calling this shit racist. Like yeah America is full of white people
Cybargs is pretty much spot on concerning that.

Granted, we would likely have international support if we could prove to the world that Mexico's military was being aggressive at the border.  Given the corruption inside the Mexican military and general law enforcement, it probably wouldn't be that hard to eventually make a case for interventionism due to certain forces being in league with the cartels.

Of course, right now would probably be the worst possible time for us to intervene, since our economy is still in the shitter.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6690|North Carolina

Harmor wrote:

We only need to look at the cartels that have taken parts of Arizona hostage as an example of the lax ROE this administration has torwards illegal traffickers of both people and drugs.
Well, Bush wasn't exactly proactive about the border either.  To be honest, we haven't had any president that was concerned with border security since Kennedy.

Last edited by Turquoise (2010-09-11 19:37:10)

Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA

Turquoise wrote:

Harmor wrote:

We only need to look at the cartels that have taken parts of Arizona hostage as an example of the lax ROE this administration has torwards illegal traffickers of both people and drugs.
Well, Bush wasn't exactly proactive about the border either.  To be honest, we haven't had any president that was concerned with border security since Kennedy.
Yeah Bush was wishy washy with thiat (remember he suggested a Guest Worker Program...and Amnesty Grahm - Senator from South Carolina, advocated amnesty).

Remember the big brew-haha we had with the Border Fence back then too?

You're right that neither party has adequately delt with this problem because they believe it will alienate Hispanic voters.  When actually its supported by a majority of Hispanic voters!

Its the Undocumented Democrats that the majority of the Democratic Party wants to win their vote.  (Note: there's a section of the Republican party, notably the Ruling Class, that is for this so its not just one party).
11 Bravo
Banned
+965|5522|Cleveland, Ohio

Ticia wrote:

Harmor wrote:

I'm more concerned about the inaction of our government with violence on this side of the border.  That our own government won't protect us is troubling.
If the US wanted to bomb all the drug cartels and clean up Mexico crime they could and with more support of the international community than they have in Afghanistan.
But the government knows being neighbours with a country at war is no fun,staying out is the best decision right now.
not sure how you came up with this gem
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6833|San Diego, CA, USA
Its a not a question of if but when the violence in Mexico will spill into the United States.  Even if Mexico bows to the drug cartels by making drugs legal, the violence will continue to escalate.

This `Nacroinsurency` will metastasize, unfortunately.

EDIT: Mexican police find car bomb in border city of Juarez; no one hurt in controlled detonation

Another car bomb...this kind of shit you see in Iraq and Afghanistan.  How long before we start seeing IED's?

Last edited by Harmor (2010-09-11 22:29:49)

Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX

Turquoise wrote:

Well, Bush wasn't exactly proactive about the border either.
Why would he? Seeing California collapse was in his interests.
Fuck Israel

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard