So what did you gain then? You're going to make a guy you don't even know feel shitty for the sake of what exactly?
Attention=Sustanance or what?
Attention=Sustanance or what?
There is nothing to gain here. In any of of this. It's all completely pointless one way or the other. I wasn't trying to gain anything, just offering my opinion, which we are all allowed to do as members.jord wrote:
So what did you gain then? You're going to make a guy you don't even know feel shitty for the sake of what exactly?
Attention=Sustanance or what?
Last edited by Macbeth (2010-08-27 15:49:09)
I hate quoting rules and talking legislation and other generic bullshit but unprovoked personal attacks aren't on, no matter what your opinion.Macbeth wrote:
There is nothing to gain here. In any of of this. It's all completely pointless one way or the other. I wasn't trying to gain anything, just offering my opinion, which we are all allowed to do as members.jord wrote:
So what did you gain then? You're going to make a guy you don't even know feel shitty for the sake of what exactly?
Attention=Sustanance or what?
You're being stupid.
Holy shit MacBeth.Macbeth wrote:
If he's working at Starbucks I doubt he'll be able to properly provide for the child in short/long term/ever. Babies can't feed on happiness. Happiness doesn't keep you warm in the winter.jord wrote:
I don't know enough about white fusion as to speculate on the "harsh truth". He's happy, his gf is and who is anyone else to try and ruin that or give the guy shit?Macbeth wrote:
He has definite point though, he's 20, working at Starbucks, and is now going to be raising a child.
FFS even I have my shit more together...
And it's not a mong post as much as you know the harsh truth...
Truth? Lol...
It would be better for everyone, the child included, if it was aborted or put up for adoption. Sorry that's the truth.
You're being stupid isn't a personal attack unless you are referring to the other stuff in the thread which isn't a personal attack either. You're the one going off on 'troll this', 'attention that'.jord wrote:
I hate quoting rules and talking legislation and other generic bullshit but unprovoked personal attacks aren't on, no matter what your opinion.Macbeth wrote:
There is nothing to gain here. In any of of this. It's all completely pointless one way or the other. I wasn't trying to gain anything, just offering my opinion, which we are all allowed to do as members.jord wrote:
So what did you gain then? You're going to make a guy you don't even know feel shitty for the sake of what exactly?
Attention=Sustanance or what?
You're being stupid.
Honestly, marriage doesn't have much to do with it, but if a couple hasn't even been married yet, it usually means they aren't even committed to each other yet let alone a kid.jord wrote:
Marriage got to do with anything?
Kids can be happy without having everything. Not that we know their situation and if they have family help that will let the kid have everything.
I was referring to "get an abortion". I'm not concerned with any attacks the likes of you have regarding intelligence.Macbeth wrote:
You're being stupid isn't a personal attack unless you are referring to the other stuff in the thread which isn't a personal attack either. You're the one going off on 'troll this', 'attention that'.jord wrote:
I hate quoting rules and talking legislation and other generic bullshit but unprovoked personal attacks aren't on, no matter what your opinion.Macbeth wrote:
There is nothing to gain here. In any of of this. It's all completely pointless one way or the other. I wasn't trying to gain anything, just offering my opinion, which we are all allowed to do as members.
You're being stupid.
I can agree with this.HaiBai wrote:
Honestly, marriage doesn't have much to do with it, but if a couple hasn't even been married yet, it usually means they aren't even committed to each other yet let alone a kid.jord wrote:
Marriage got to do with anything?
Kids can be happy without having everything. Not that we know their situation and if they have family help that will let the kid have everything.
Anyway, of course the kid can still be happy. But is he the happiest that he could've been? Would the kid be happier if they waited 5 years and settled into a family life, or would the kid be happier if the parents rushed into everything because they wanted a kid? That's called being selfish, and it makes me question what type of decisions they'll make for the kid later in it's life.
Happiness is relative. If a kid is brought up with not much and their quality of life gradually improves they'll appreciate it more and be happier for it. If I were a millionaire you can bet any children I had wouldn't be appearing on "my super sweet 16".HaiBai wrote:
Honestly, marriage doesn't have much to do with it, but if a couple hasn't even been married yet, it usually means they aren't even committed to each other yet let alone a kid.jord wrote:
Marriage got to do with anything?
Kids can be happy without having everything. Not that we know their situation and if they have family help that will let the kid have everything.
Anyway, of course the kid can still be happy. But is he the happiest that he could've been? Would the kid be happier if they waited 5 years and settled into a family life, or would the kid be happier if the parents rushed into everything because they wanted a kid? That's called being selfish, and it makes me question what type of decisions they'll make for the kid later in it's life.
'Get an abortion' isn't a personal attack. lol right because you're really the apex of intelligence.jord wrote:
I was referring to "get an abortion". I'm not concerned with any attacks the likes of you have regarding intelligence.Macbeth wrote:
You're being stupid isn't a personal attack unless you are referring to the other stuff in the thread which isn't a personal attack either. You're the one going off on 'troll this', 'attention that'.jord wrote:
I hate quoting rules and talking legislation and other generic bullshit but unprovoked personal attacks aren't on, no matter what your opinion.
It can be construed that way.Macbeth wrote:
'Get an abortion' isn't a personal attack. lol right because you're really the apex of intelligence.jord wrote:
I was referring to "get an abortion". I'm not concerned with any attacks the likes of you have regarding intelligence.Macbeth wrote:
You're being stupid isn't a personal attack unless you are referring to the other stuff in the thread which isn't a personal attack either. You're the one going off on 'troll this', 'attention that'.
I guess I should fuck a bitch now, then leave her. The kid will be raised by a 16 year old mom without a job. But the kid will end up happy because she got married again when she was 21. Besides, I need to remind you, there's more to consider then just the happiness of the kid, including the health, education, and successful of the kid.jord wrote:
Happiness is relative. If a kid is brought up with not much and their quality of life gradually improves they'll appreciate it more and be happier for it. If I were a millionaire you can bet any children I had wouldn't be appearing on "my super sweet 16".HaiBai wrote:
Honestly, marriage doesn't have much to do with it, but if a couple hasn't even been married yet, it usually means they aren't even committed to each other yet let alone a kid.jord wrote:
Marriage got to do with anything?
Kids can be happy without having everything. Not that we know their situation and if they have family help that will let the kid have everything.
Anyway, of course the kid can still be happy. But is he the happiest that he could've been? Would the kid be happier if they waited 5 years and settled into a family life, or would the kid be happier if the parents rushed into everything because they wanted a kid? That's called being selfish, and it makes me question what type of decisions they'll make for the kid later in it's life.
Marriage argument is so so in modern times. I think marriages will decrease in future.
O god lol. Yeah ok, jord. You'll be in the top 10%, I'm sure. Because the popularity of opinions are a gauge for anything.jord wrote:
It can be construed that way.Macbeth wrote:
'Get an abortion' isn't a personal attack. lol right because you're really the apex of intelligence.jord wrote:
I was referring to "get an abortion". I'm not concerned with any attacks the likes of you have regarding intelligence.
I never said I was intelligent, I doubt if there was a universal gauge of intellect for this board id be in the top 10%. At least I know that though. I also doubt you would be, as having unpopular opinions doesn't equate to anything.
You're being insensitive, cruel, troll, a dick rah rah rah.HaiBai wrote:
there's more to consider then just the happiness of the kid, including the health, education, and successful of the kid.
I said I wouldn't be, gain some comprehensive skills. And then perhaps some social skills.Macbeth wrote:
O god lol. Yeah ok, jord. You'll be in the top 10%, I'm sure. Because the popularity of opinions are a gauge for anything.jord wrote:
It can be construed that way.Macbeth wrote:
'Get an abortion' isn't a personal attack. lol right because you're really the apex of intelligence.
I never said I was intelligent, I doubt if there was a universal gauge of intellect for this board id be in the top 10%. At least I know that though. I also doubt you would be, as having unpopular opinions doesn't equate to anything.
Oops misread my bad.jord wrote:
I said I wouldn't be, gain some comprehensive skills. And then perhaps some social skills.Macbeth wrote:
O god lol. Yeah ok, jord. You'll be in the top 10%, I'm sure. Because the popularity of opinions are a gauge for anything. :rolleyes:jord wrote:
It can be construed that way.
I never said I was intelligent, I doubt if there was a universal gauge of intellect for this board id be in the top 10%. At least I know that though. I also doubt you would be, as having unpopular opinions doesn't equate to anything.
I didn't say the popularity of opinions is a measure of intelligence. I said that's all you have going for you, the niche opinion.
I'm tired of having to repeat myself anyway.
That's a bit of an extreme example. I was thinking more in terms of material goods.HaiBai wrote:
I guess I should fuck a bitch now, then leave her. The kid will be raised by a 16 year old mom without a job. But the kid will end up happy because she got married again when she was 21. Besides, I need to remind you, there's more to consider then just the happiness of the kid, including the health, education, and successful of the kid.jord wrote:
Happiness is relative. If a kid is brought up with not much and their quality of life gradually improves they'll appreciate it more and be happier for it. If I were a millionaire you can bet any children I had wouldn't be appearing on "my super sweet 16".HaiBai wrote:
Honestly, marriage doesn't have much to do with it, but if a couple hasn't even been married yet, it usually means they aren't even committed to each other yet let alone a kid.
Anyway, of course the kid can still be happy. But is he the happiest that he could've been? Would the kid be happier if they waited 5 years and settled into a family life, or would the kid be happier if the parents rushed into everything because they wanted a kid? That's called being selfish, and it makes me question what type of decisions they'll make for the kid later in it's life.
Marriage argument is so so in modern times. I think marriages will decrease in future.
You're right, its speculative to assume you're shooting for the niche opinion. Afterall I know nothing about you...Macbeth wrote:
Oops misread my bad.jord wrote:
I said I wouldn't be, gain some comprehensive skills. And then perhaps some social skills.Macbeth wrote:
O god lol. Yeah ok, jord. You'll be in the top 10%, I'm sure. Because the popularity of opinions are a gauge for anything.
I didn't say the popularity of opinions is a measure of intelligence. I said that's all you have going for you, the niche opinion.
I'm tired of having to repeat myself anyway.
I'm not going for the niche opinion. If you really think I'm shooting for : The guy with the niche opinion. then you're a retard.
Then stop responding back.
That's a stupid post meant to take it the discussion to a hypothetical level in which it's easier for you to win thus avoiding the facts of the discussion.jord wrote:
That's a bit of an extreme example. I was thinking more in terms of material goods.HaiBai wrote:
I guess I should fuck a bitch now, then leave her. The kid will be raised by a 16 year old mom without a job. But the kid will end up happy because she got married again when she was 21. Besides, I need to remind you, there's more to consider then just the happiness of the kid, including the health, education, and successful of the kid.jord wrote:
Happiness is relative. If a kid is brought up with not much and their quality of life gradually improves they'll appreciate it more and be happier for it. If I were a millionaire you can bet any children I had wouldn't be appearing on "my super sweet 16".
Marriage argument is so so in modern times. I think marriages will decrease in future.
A kid gets everything they want up until 15, including anual holidays. Then it goes downhill.
A kid doesn't always get what they want, what little they have they appreciate. Come mid teenage years they get what they want more.
Which is happier?
Go disappear for 7 months again. I'm sure nobody would notice.daddyofdeath wrote:
I've got an opinion Macbeth...my opinion is you are insensitive to this situation....you have nothing ofvalue to say on the subject. Your intellect is that of a cat licking its own balls. How do you like the taste of those apples?
Last edited by Macbeth (2010-08-27 16:20:13)
Again reread. I didn't take the discussion to a hypothetical level I just responded in kind. Now unless you're going to start reading posts twice to fully understand them, then spend a minute processing that text before you mash out a reply, then we're done.Macbeth wrote:
That's a stupid post meant to take it the discussion to a hypothetical level in which it's easier for you to win thus avoiding the facts of the discussion.jord wrote:
That's a bit of an extreme example. I was thinking more in terms of material goods.HaiBai wrote:
I guess I should fuck a bitch now, then leave her. The kid will be raised by a 16 year old mom without a job. But the kid will end up happy because she got married again when she was 21. Besides, I need to remind you, there's more to consider then just the happiness of the kid, including the health, education, and successful of the kid.
A kid gets everything they want up until 15, including anual holidays. Then it goes downhill.
A kid doesn't always get what they want, what little they have they appreciate. Come mid teenage years they get what they want more.
Which is happier?