it's the PRINCIPLE. i cannot believe you are so openly and readily accepting the GOVERNMENT invading your privacy EVERY SINGLE DAY for NO justified reason. you are an independent person with rights-- one of those, one of the most important, being a right to your own privacy. that means not letting some government agency or government body daily invade your activities, your background and your available 'data'. a government isn't an infallible, god-like ruler that just autonomously 'works'. a government is made up of equivocally fallible, corruptible, personally inconsistent individuals. i don't want them prying into my own business-- and nor should you. what qualifies them or gives them that right? just because they're the government and they can write their own laws saying so? no. that is wrong. it is undemocratic and completely against the principles of human liberty and freedom. the less the government interferes in my life, on a day-to-day basis, the better. "im not doing anything wrong so it's okay for them to snoop around in my business at all" is a scarily resigning and casual attitude to take to a HUGE invasion of your rights.RDMC wrote:
Right. Didn't understand half of it, but still if you've got nothing to hide, then what is the big deal?Uzique wrote:
erm, hello. the legislation (e.g. the patriot act) is written-up and legally worded so as to give a VERY wide definition of 'terrorist'. that was the neocons tactful tampering: introducing political agendas and ambitions to the legislative/judiciary side of government. the patriot act is a decidedly ultra-conservative piece of legislation that seeks only to alienate, criminalize and invade the rights of the US's own citizens. it's kind of like the purposeful open-endedness of the definition of 'combatant' or 'pirate' in relevant war/piracy laws. the people that draft these documents up do so with a very specific and self-aware set of terminologies that can be left to the discretionary doctrine of judicial interpretation in a very... 'open'... way. all it takes is a judge with a right-wing world-view (of which there are many on the US Supreme Court) and the Patriot Act suddenly becomes a VERY imposing and intimidating piece of law.RDMC wrote:
I think most of you do not have to worry about your car being tracked. Think this mostly applies to high profile criminals or people suspected from terrorist activities.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/