Probably because he's a phony.JohnG@lt wrote:
Still wondering why ATG never joined the army if he feels so strongly about fighting Muslims.
I care about people.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
If you demand revenge so much, then why don't you enact it?
If you are so adamant about about killing these people, then why do you need others to do it for you?
If you need these people dead so badly, then you need to go and shoot up your local mosque by yourself.
Otherwise you are fucking coward.
And either way you are a sociopath.
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-08-14 20:45:25)
Cool, so when are you going to start quoting Al-Jazeera since you feel so strongly that the 'official version' is simply doctored by the NWO?
and all jews arent evil yet i dare you to wear the star of david around meccaUnkleRukus wrote:
Why cant people understand that not all towel-heads are terrorists?
all it takes is one shithead sand person and the rest will follow suit in a severe beating. People are sheep.11 Bravo wrote:
and all jews arent evil yet i dare you to wear the star of david around meccaUnkleRukus wrote:
Why cant people understand that not all towel-heads are terrorists?
They've been fighting in the Balkans for about a millenia, Balkans was the word people used before we had clusterfuck.ATG wrote:
I care about people.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
If you demand revenge so much, then why don't you enact it?
If you are so adamant about about killing these people, then why do you need others to do it for you?
If you need these people dead so badly, then you need to go and shoot up your local mosque by yourself.
Otherwise you are fucking coward.
And either way you are a sociopath.
And speaking of people, you guys are so easy to manipulate.
I ask again, why were the Serbian Muslims being killed?
UnkleRukus wrote:
Why cant people understand that not all towel-heads are terrorists?
So, they are not all terrorists but they are all sand persons?UnkleRukus wrote:
all it takes is one shithead sand person and the rest will follow suit in a severe beating. People are sheep.11 Bravo wrote:
and all jews arent evil yet i dare you to wear the star of david around meccaUnkleRukus wrote:
Why cant people understand that not all towel-heads are terrorists?
New York should treat others better than Meca.11 Bravo wrote:
and all jews arent evil yet i dare you to wear the star of david around meccaUnkleRukus wrote:
Why cant people understand that not all towel-heads are terrorists?
maybe but wear a cowboys jersey on gameday and see how nice they areAussieReaper wrote:
New York should treat others better than Meca.11 Bravo wrote:
and all jews arent evil yet i dare you to wear the star of david around meccaUnkleRukus wrote:
Why cant people understand that not all towel-heads are terrorists?
In turn, why can't you understand that the vast majority of terrorists today are "towel heads"?UnkleRukus wrote:
Why cant people understand that not all towel-heads are terrorists?
Last edited by lowing (2010-08-15 19:36:38)
ATG remindes me of the drunken bums in ACATG wrote:
Good. That works for me.
Bag-of-Hammers;11661361 wrote:
I hate Muhammad. He was a murderer, thief, sex slave raping, pedophile, antiChrist, antiDemocracy. And anyone who sticks up for him as his cover-up is not trust worthy and/or irrisponsible.
Bag-of-Hammers;11661396 wrote:
I don't think she understood the problem back then. I didn't either at the time. She stood up for oppressed Islamic women, and she was on the right track. Islam perverts God's intended love to prostitute it out to Muhammad's cover-up for evil.
Bag-of-Hammers;11661421 wrote:
It is in the Koran that says what Muhammad is. It's all there. Everything from having sex with a 9 year old, to murdering Jewish men and taking all the women as sex slaves. And EVERYBODY in Islam is cool with all that. They have no compassion for the 1000's of victims of murder, pedophilia, and sexual slavery. THey stick up for him, love him, and blindly follows his sick, twisted lies. They are all a part of a cover up.
Bag-of-Hammers;11661471 wrote:
Islam is a perversion of God's love. God can't love Islam. It's like loving a ***** that perverts your pure love's true intent and meaning. It is an abomination of God.
Thats what you get if you mess with them, they were mostly Irish before that.lowing wrote:
We do, in turn, why can't you understand that the vast majority of terrorists today are "towel heads"?UnkleRukus wrote:
Why cant people understand that not all towel-heads are terrorists?
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-08-15 17:51:17)
I could have sworn democracy existed in ancient Greece and Rome.Spark wrote:
The anti-democracy comment got a laugh. Because of the implication that at the time (and for however many centuries before and after) there was such a thing as "democracy"
it was extreeeeeeeeeeeeemely different to 'democracy' in a post-enlightenment, western sense.Macbeth wrote:
I could have sworn democracy existed in ancient Greece and Rome.Spark wrote:
The anti-democracy comment got a laugh. Because of the implication that at the time (and for however many centuries before and after) there was such a thing as "democracy"
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-08-15 19:28:15)
O I understand that it was more of the wealthy voting in friends to positions of power rather than everyone getting a vote in a fair election system but at least the very basic idea of rule by more than one existed at the time.Uzique wrote:
it was extreeeeeeeeeeeeemely different to 'democracy' in a post-enlightenment, western sense.Macbeth wrote:
I could have sworn democracy existed in ancient Greece and Rome.Spark wrote:
The anti-democracy comment got a laugh. Because of the implication that at the time (and for however many centuries before and after) there was such a thing as "democracy"
Yes, however democracy had long been extinct by that point. The Roman Republic was completely stripped of power in 27 BC.Macbeth wrote:
O I understand that it was more of the wealthy voting in friends to positions of power rather than everyone getting a vote in a fair election system but at least the very basic idea of rule by more than one existed at the time.Uzique wrote:
it was extreeeeeeeeeeeeemely different to 'democracy' in a post-enlightenment, western sense.Macbeth wrote:
I could have sworn democracy existed in ancient Greece and Rome.
Yes but the idea still existed at the time, don't be dense.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Yes, however democracy had long been extinct by that point. The Roman Republic was completely stripped of power in 27 BC.Macbeth wrote:
O I understand that it was more of the wealthy voting in friends to positions of power rather than everyone getting a vote in a fair election system but at least the very basic idea of rule by more than one existed at the time.Uzique wrote:
it was extreeeeeeeeeeeeemely different to 'democracy' in a post-enlightenment, western sense.
I'm not taking him seriously.JohnG@lt wrote:
Umm, the guy is a raging lunatic, how anyone is taking what he said even remotely seriously is
Edit - I posted it for sheer comedic value.
