http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100805/ap_ … ier_killer
Christ now we gotta come up with a "carrier killer", killer!!
Christ now we gotta come up with a "carrier killer", killer!!
LOLlowing wrote:
Liberals have got to go, I fear Obama will do nothing except bow to China and apologize for...well........anything
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-08-05 17:08:40)
Domination of half the globe.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Not entirely sure what China would have to gain by sinking one of our carriers, anyway.
Don't be a hater, it is not my fault you suck so bad you could not return to the Army as a civilian DoD employee. I guess even the Army has standards they will not detour from.eleven bravo wrote:
another potential conflict you could profiteer from! yay!
Last edited by lowing (2010-08-05 17:12:02)
But 5 missiles could wipe out your 'force projection'.eleven bravo wrote:
china doesnt have the force projection that we do, even without a navy that has more aircraft than all of the worlds airforces combined
no, I have a sense of duty and came back to the army as a pschological operations specialist. One of the 5 branches of United States Army special operations.lowing wrote:
Don't be a hater, it is not my fault you suck so bad you could not return to the Army as a civilian DoD employee.eleven bravo wrote:
another potential conflict you could profiteer from! yay!
Last edited by eleven bravo (2010-08-05 17:14:35)
I dont think you understand what force projection is.Dilbert_X wrote:
But 5 missiles could wipe out your 'force projection'.eleven bravo wrote:
china doesnt have the force projection that we do, even without a navy that has more aircraft than all of the worlds airforces combined
Don't be dumb. Do you even understand what force projection is?Dilbert_X wrote:
But 5 missiles could wipe out your 'force projection'.eleven bravo wrote:
china doesnt have the force projection that we do, even without a navy that has more aircraft than all of the worlds airforces combined
translation...............I couldn't find a job on the outside as a civilian, probably due to my arrests.eleven bravo wrote:
no, I have a sense of duty and came back to the army as a pschological operations specialist. One of the 5 branches of United States Army special operations.lowing wrote:
Don't be a hater, it is not my fault you suck so bad you could not return to the Army as a civilian DoD employee.eleven bravo wrote:
another potential conflict you could profiteer from! yay!
and depending on my lsat score Ill be going back as a commissioned officer
Last edited by lowing (2010-08-05 17:16:52)
Congratulations, let me guess, when you grow up you want to be an ACLU lawyer.eleven bravo wrote:
Ive been a fulltime college student since I left. try again
Last edited by lowing (2010-08-05 17:20:03)
Seriously? So they'd be the ones to have to go spank the Middle East...while losing business in the US? Poor swap for them, if you ask me. China's more patient than that.Dilbert_X wrote:
Domination of half the globe.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Not entirely sure what China would have to gain by sinking one of our carriers, anyway.
No-one needs to spank the ME, they know the US economy will implode soon enough - they have a long term plan which is why they're building their military now.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Seriously? So they'd be the ones to have to go spank the Middle East...while losing business in the US? Poor swap for them, if you ask me. China's more patient than that.Dilbert_X wrote:
Domination of half the globe.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Not entirely sure what China would have to gain by sinking one of our carriers, anyway.
Last edited by eleven bravo (2010-08-05 18:03:27)
Which is pretty hard if you don't have carriers to provide the protective umbrella.eleven bravo wrote:
dude, no. Force projection not only covers destructive capabilites, in fact it has more to do with the ability to place a number of military forces on any piece of earth within small window of time. dont be naive dude.