I think you misinterpreted my post. I wasn't putting Starcraft down. I actually prefer games that are easy to pickup and play. I consider myself more of a casual gamer. I played Starcraft quite a bit back in the day, but I was never as into it as many of my peers. That doesn't mean it's a bad game. You're right that I haven't played Starcraft 2, but the only comments I made regarding that game were involving the graphics. I suppose I should've specified between the 2 in the paragraph mentioning graphics.Uzique wrote:
all you guys saying sc2 is 'one third' of a game are fucking retarded and clearly have never played it. the campaign, challenges, co-op, and let alone MULTIPLAYER content is worth £35. then there is the entire battle.net framework, and about 10 hour's worth of in-game cinematics, movies and top-notch voice/character acting. in comparison, most of you whining bought bc2 and mw2 for £50, paying far more for FAR LESS: a reskin and a dumbing down. also, at people like turq... saying games like warcraft and starcraft are 'dumbed down'... have you fucking played the games? i would never ever call starcraft 'dumbed down' - in fact i would say it's probably the most difficult and demanding pc game around, and will be for quite some time. world of warcraft as well certainly was not 'dumbed down' at release. why are you people talking shite about games you have clearly not even played for 15 minutes? be quiet... this is D&ST not Guess & Blag Shite.
stop whining at certain game devs that are doing a perfectly fine job of stimulating the pc gaming industry.
I did play WoW a little bit, but I got bored pretty quickly. I prefer Fallout 3 and Oblivion over that.