![https://www.leftycartoons.com/wp-content/uploads/types_of_libertarian1.png](https://www.leftycartoons.com/wp-content/uploads/types_of_libertarian1.png)
Pretty accurate, is it not?
True, and that is definitely a problem among both Republicans and Democrats as well...SenorToenails wrote:
Well...libertarian ideas are hijacked by people with a limited personal agenda...leading to the stereotypes. Like, stoners might say they are libertarian because they want their drugs legalized...but they aren't necessarily onboard with the rest of the ideaology and can become pretty hypocritical.
Now when have I ever said people should read Atlas Shrugged and use it as their bible? Yeah, my screenname is from the book but whatever.Cybargs wrote:
Missionary tooJohnG@lt wrote:
I know this is a dig at me, but the only one that really fits me is the "too much heinlein" one
You're not even an objectivist, how dare you wear the name JohnGalt? You should get a name change to something like JohnGutierrez, to be honest.JohnG@lt wrote:
Now when have I ever said people should read Atlas Shrugged and use it as their bible? Yeah, my screenname is from the book but whatever.Cybargs wrote:
Missionary tooJohnG@lt wrote:
I know this is a dig at me, but the only one that really fits me is the "too much heinlein" one
Because I understand that we aren't our own island and are dependent on others for trading partners if nothing else? While I could probably build my own house, harvest my own food and teach my own children, my standard of living would drop. I, unlike Rand, recognize that I actually do need a certain amount of healthy, educated people in my life so that we may all prosper together. Now, that may sound slightly socialist in nature but the difference is that people have to earn what they want in life in such a relationship rather than be handed it simply because they exist. I don't believe in coddling those who have no societal, or personal, value.Macbeth wrote:
You're not even an objectivist, how dare you wear the name JohnGalt? You should get a name change to something like JohnGutierrez, to be honest.JohnG@lt wrote:
Now when have I ever said people should read Atlas Shrugged and use it as their bible? Yeah, my screenname is from the book but whatever.Cybargs wrote:
Missionary too
Because most people are simple minded so they need to condense their beliefs into a highly general category.Dilbert_X wrote:
Why do people feel the need to pigeon-hole themselves?
The Rep-Dem mindcamps are very tedious.
I think its more they don't have any real thoughts or beliefs and so pick a ready made pack off the shelf - even if the bundle is self-contradictory.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Because most people are simple minded so they need to condense their beliefs into a highly general category.Dilbert_X wrote:
Why do people feel the need to pigeon-hole themselves?
The Rep-Dem mindcamps are very tedious.
Last edited by RAIMIUS (2010-07-15 22:52:39)
Vote for me, when I win, I'll quit!*Spark wrote:
It's also somewhat counterintuitive to be running for office based on a platform which seeks to reduce the power of said office.
And on and on...Dilbert_X wrote:
Why do people feel the need to pigeon-hole themselves?
The Rep-Dem Labour-Conservative (UK) mindcamps are very tedious.
The Rep-Dem Labor-Liberal (Australia) mindcamps are very tedious.
Last edited by FEOS (2010-07-16 04:03:49)
Well aware of that, don't like any of them, don't like the two party first past the post system eitherFEOS wrote:
And on and on...Dilbert_X wrote:
Why do people feel the need to pigeon-hole themselves?
The Rep-Dem Labour-Conservative (UK) mindcamps are very tedious.
The Rep-Dem Labor-Liberal (Australia) mindcamps are very tedious.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-07-16 05:50:04)
They at least have more than 2 viable parties to choose from.FEOS wrote:
And on and on...Dilbert_X wrote:
Why do people feel the need to pigeon-hole themselves?
The Rep-Dem Labour-Conservative (UK) mindcamps are very tedious.
The Rep-Dem Labor-Liberal (Australia) mindcamps are very tedious.